《经济发展及环境保护英文辩论赛》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《经济发展及环境保护英文辩论赛（7页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、.Which should receive priority in china ，economic growth or environmental protection？正方一辩：从人类发展的终极目标看，我们要彻底地解决环境问题，必须要标本兼治。要治本，必须优先发展经济，从根本上优化经济结构堵住产生环境问题的源头，要治标，同样要优先发展经济，为解决眼前的环境问题提供技术、资金等支持，只有这样，才能为人类生存和发展提供环境保障。From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and
2、 root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly. To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priorit
3、y to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supportsfor solving the environmental problems.Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.反方一辩：经济发展是指社会能够提供丰裕的商品来改善人类的物质生活,环境保护那么是采取一定的政策措施来保护生态平衡。经济要发展意味着企业需要更多的厂房与原材料来
4、保障商品的供应那便存在一个问题：自然分给人类的土地与原材料是有限,经济优先发展就一定会侵占原本不属于人类的自然资源。The economic development refers to society can provideabundant modity to improve human material life; environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance. economic development means that panies need m
5、ore workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goodsthen there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.二辩盘问Two debate questioned反方二辩：请问对方二辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，
6、哪个重要？经济发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗？My fellow debaters ，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice; how can we still survive if there is no environm
7、ent.正方二辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。并不是说经济优先就不搞环保了，只是环保处于较次的位置，跟中国现状一样，政策虽然说要重视环保，但一般县区还是经济发展优先的，也就有资本的大城市才比较重视搞环保，相信大家心知肚明Sorry, Im afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economydevelopment firstdoes not mean totally ignorethe environmental protection, the environmental prote
8、ction is just in the inferior position .Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take itseriously to environmental protection, everybo
9、dy know it in our own heart.反方二辩：请问正方三辩，如果发展经济优先的话，很可能造成环境成本大于经济效益的情况，这样的经济是发展还是倒退？Excuse me,my fellow debaters.If economic development receivespriority then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up 正方三辩：这种情况确实有存在，但并不是
10、每时每刻都存在。各个行业情况不同，我们不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，这种情况下经济效益是负的，那我们改行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈？我不这么觉得。This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment. The situation in each industry is different; we cannot draw conclusions from one part. But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then
11、 if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit I dont think so.正方二辩：我们知道环境的保护是预防为主，防治结合，而预防和治理都要依靠技术的发展，那请问对方二辩，如果没有强有力的经济基础支持科学技术发展，那么以科技为支撑的环保从何谈起呢？We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should bine prevention with treatment, and the prevention an
12、d control depends on the development of technology, thenmy fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then dont mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方二辩：你的问题未免抽象了点。科技发展无止尽，经济发展也没尽头，什么时候算得上是“强有力呢？但是环境保护是迫在眉睫，耽
13、误不起。Your question is a little abstract. Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when willit be considered as “strong But environmental protection is imminent, which cant afford to delay.正方二辩：请问反方三辩，经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活容，包括衣食住行娱乐，这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗？Excuse me, my fellow de
14、baters.The responsibilityof economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isnt it now the peoples universal desire 反方三辩：人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人们更倾向于在一个既能享受到生活乐趣，同时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存。Peoples expectation is not necessarily that good. I believe
15、that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious naturalenvironment 自由辩论正方一辩：请问对方辩友，原始社会的人类祖先们环境保护工作做得可谓好了吧，而他们经济发展很落后，所所以才一直过着钻木取火、茹毛饮血的生活，按你们的意思我们应该回归这种生活吗？Excuse me, my fellow friends .In the primitive society, human ancestors environmenta
16、l protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning 反方一辩：人类祖先确实需要发展经济，但假设是在这个过程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也无法发展下去了。我想问的是，核电站是经济发展的产物，但众所周知，几次核电站的泄漏带来了环境的极度恶化，请问你怎么看？Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the fore
