《文明的冲突theclashofcivlization》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《文明的冲突theclashofcivlization（28页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs Summer 1993, 72/3. SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTON is the Eaton Professor of the Science of Government and Director of the John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies at Harvard University. This article is the product of the Olin Institutes pro
2、ject on The Changing Security Environment and American National Interests.Sections: I. THE NEXT PATTERN OF CONFLICTII. THE NATURE OF CIVILIZATIONSIII. WHY CIVILIZATIONS WILL CLASHIV. THE FAULT LINES BETWEEN CIVILIZATIONSV. CIVILIZATION RALLYINGVI. THE WEST VERSUS THE RESTVII. THE TORN COUNTRIESVIII.
3、 THE CONFUCIAN-ISLAMIC CONNECTIONIX. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE WEST I. THE NEXT PATTERN OF CONFLICTWORLD POLITICS IS entering a new phase, and intellectuals have not hesitated to proliferate visions of what it will be - the end of history, the return of traditional rivalries between nation states, and th
4、e decline of the nation state from the conflicting pulls of tribalism and globalism, among others. Each of these visions catches aspects of the emerging reality. Yet they all miss a crucial, indeed a central, aspect of what global politics is likely to be in the coming years.It is my hypothesis that
5、 the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts
6、of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.Conflict between civilizations will be the latest phase of the evolution of conflict in the modern world. For a century and a half after the emergenc
7、e of the modern international system of the Peace of Westphalia, the conflicts of the Western world were largely among princes - emperors, absolute monarchs and constitutional monarchs attempting to expand their bureaucracies, their armies, their mercantilist economic strength and, most important, t
8、he territory they ruled. In the process they created nation states, and beginning with the French Revolution the principal lines of conflict were between nations rather than princes. In 1793, as R. R. Palmer put it, The wars of kings were over; the ward of peoples had begun. This nineteenth-century
9、pattern lasted until the end of World War I. Then, as a result of the Russian Revolution and the reaction against it, the conflict of nations yielded to the conflict of ideologies, first among communism, fascism-Nazism and liberal democracy, and then between communism and liberal democracy. During t
10、he Cold War, this latter conflict became embodied in the struggle between the two superpowers, neither of which was a nation state in the classical European sense and each of which defined its identity in terms of ideology.These conflicts between princes, nation states and ideologies were primarily
11、conflicts within Western civilization, Western civil wars, as William Lind has labeled them. This was as true of the Cold War as it was of the world wars and the earlier wars of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. With the end of the Cold War, international politics moves out of it
12、s Western phase, and its center-piece becomes the interaction between the West and non-Western civilizations and among non-Western civilizations. In the politics of civilizations, the people and governments of non-Western civilizations no longer remain the objects of history as targets of Western co
13、lonialism but join the West as movers and shapers of history. II. THE NATURE OF CIVILIZATIONSDURING THE COLD WAR the world was divided into the First, Second and Third Worlds. Those divisions are no longer relevant. It is far more meaningful now to group countries not in terms of their political or
14、economic systems or in terms of their level of economic development but rather in terms of their culture and civilization.What do we mean when we talk of a civilization? A civilization is a cultural entity. Villages, regions, ethnic groups, nationalities, religious groups, all have distinct cultures
15、 at different levels of cultural heterogeneity. The culture of a village in southern Italy may be different from that of a village in northern Italy, but both will share in a common Italian culture that distinguishes them from German villages. European communities, in turn, will share cultural featu
16、res that distinguish them from Arab or Chinese communities. Arabs, Chinese and Westerners, however, are not part of any broader cultural entity. They constitute civilizations. A civilization is thus the highest cultural grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural identity people have short of that which distinguishes humans from other species. It is defined both by common objective elements, such as language, history, religion, custo
