《2023年浙江省杭州市十八中高三英语上学期周末检测卷十四.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2023年浙江省杭州市十八中高三英语上学期周末检测卷十四.doc（20页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、浙江省杭州市十八中20192019上学期高三英语周末检测卷十四第I卷第一部 分：听力（共两节，满分30分） 做题时，先将答案标在试卷上。录音内容结束后，你将有两分钟的时间将试卷上的答案转涂到答题卡上。第一节 （共5个小题；每题1.5分，满分7.5分）听下面5段对话。每段对话后有一个小题，从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置。听完每段对话后，你都有10秒钟的时间来回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。每段对话仅读一遍。1. What is the man related to the woman? A. Her brother.B. Her father.C. Her gra
2、ndfather.2. What is the woman going to do next week? A. Learn jazz.B. Buy a radio.C. Go to a concert.3. When does the man usually go off work?A. At 4:30 pm.B. At 5:00 pm.C. At 8:00 pm.4. What did the woman buy? A. Some flowers.B. A pair of shoes.C. A pair of trousers.5. What does the man mean?A. He
3、has no interest in wild animals.B. He is preparing for an exam.C. He cant join the group.第二节 （共15小题；每小题1.5分，满分22.5分）听下面5段对话或独白。每段对话或独白后有几个小题，从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置。听每段对话或独白前，你将有时间阅读各个小题，每小题5秒钟；听完后，各小题给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话或独白读两遍。听下面一段对话，回答第6和第7两个小题。6.What type of computer is Mrs. Robbins selling
4、?A. An IBM 6790.B. An IBM 6775.C. A Halley 6790.7. How long has Mrs. Robbins had her computer?A. 8 months.B. 10 months.C. 18 months.听下面一段对话，回答第8至第10 三个小题。8. What did Jack do during the summer vacation?A. He studied very hard.B. He took a summer class.C. He visited his teacher.9. How does Jack descri
5、be Ms. Wellington? A. Some flowers.B. A pair of shoes.C. A pair of trousers.10. Why is Ms. Wellingtons class hard?A. It has too many exams.B. Her pronunciation isnt good.C. She gives too much homework.听下面一段对话，回答第11至第13 三个小题。11. Where does the woman probably work? A. In a clinic.B. In a sports shop.C
6、. In a gym.12. Why does the man want to do sports?A. He got hurt in certain parts.B. He has been in poor health.C. He always sits at work.13. What activity is the man interested in? A. Swimming. B. Weightlifting. C. Jogging.C. Jogging.听下面一段对话，回答第14至第17 四个小题。14. What is the man doing? A. Introducing
7、a book.B. Telling a story.C. Having an interview.15. What do the organization members do?A. They do business with local people.B. They volunteer in medical centers.C. They help set up schools.16. What made the man make the decision? A. A local product.B. A Brazilian organization.C. A trip to Brazil.
8、17. What does the man find interesting in the book?A. The impacts of the climate change all over the world.B. The projects on energy saving in Netherlands.C. The huge amount of natural resources.听下面一段对话，回答第18至第20 三个小题。18. What is Londons West End?A. A street full of buses and cars.B. A well-known sh
9、opping area.C. A famous department store.19. How do people in London celebrate the New Year?A. By setting off fireworks.B. By singing Christmas songs.C. By watching the parade on TV.20. What is the purpose of this speech?A. To introduce the best shopping district in London.B. To encourage people to
10、buy the Christmas trees.C. To attract people to visit London in December.第二部 分：阅读理解（共两节，满分35分）第一节 （共10个小题；每小题2.5分，满分25分）阅读下列材料，从每题所给的四个选项中（A、B、C和D）中，选出最佳答案，并在答题纸上将该选项标号涂黑。A Dont run less hard. Dont run less often. Dont run less distance. And dont be persuaded by under powered medical studies a habit
11、 that really could harm your health. I say this in response to a recent study suggesting that too much strenuous jogging shortens your life. The conclusions, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, have received wide attention this week.Lets start by taking a closer look at w
12、hat the study actually says. The researchers asked Danish runners about the speed, frequency and duration of their workouts, categorizing 878 of them as light, moderate or strenuous joggers. Ten years later, the researchers checked government records to see how many of them had died. Happily, only 1
13、7 had. While this was good news for the surviving runners, it was bad news for the researchers, because 17 was clearly too few deaths to discern whether the risk of death was related to running intensity. Nonetheless, the study claimed that too much jogging was associated with a higher mortality rat
14、e. It is based on 40 people who were categorized as “strenuous joggers” among whom only two died. As Alex Hutchinson of Runners World wrote, “Thank goodness a third person didnt die, or public health authorities would be banning jogging.” Moreover, the researchers do not even report whether those tw
15、o deaths were from causes that could plausibly be related to running. Indeed, none of the comparisons between those who run a lot versus a little, frequently versus infrequently, or fast versus slow, were statistically significant, even after adjusting for potential factors like age, gender, education, diabetes, smoking and drinking. The researchers acknowledge this lack of significance, but confounded the issue by pointing to a different question. Instead of focusing on the differences between light, moderate and hea
