《影评的格式.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《影评的格式.docx（15页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、影评的格式篇一：影评写作格式 影评的格式和范文 模式一：单角度评析 题目：主标题 副标题（主题思想、人物形象或者艺术手法） 第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）+中心论点（20字） 第二段：分论点一 第三段：分论点二 第四段：总结（升华主题，并联系现实，提出个人思考） 模式二：多角度评析 题目：主标题 副标题（不用提出角度，只需要点出评什么电影就可以了） 第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字） 第二段：评主题思想（看不出准确的主题思想，可以用感受来代替，但一定要结 合电影情节，不要写成纯观后感） 第三段：评人物形象（可以评一个，也可以评多个） 第四段：评艺术手法（镜头、音
2、乐、台词、画面、色彩等等） 第五段：总结，提出一个总体的评价（弥补开始第一段的中心论点缺失） 模式三：散评式 题目：主标题 副标题 也可以只用一个题目：比如说“评电影花火” 全文自由分段，想到哪儿写到哪儿，可以评价电影的任何一个部分或细节。 注意不要写成观后感，也不要写成电影简介，要注意“叙”“析”“评”相结合。篇二：影评的格式 阿甘正传观后感（中英文对照） 阿甘有自己的坚持，他不断地跑步，JUST RUNS. 他跑步不为任何理由。他说:人要往前看，千万不要被过去拖累。我想我跑步就是这个意义”和过去告别，不停留在原处。也许这世界上太多人随拨逐流，很少人会坚持做一件事，阿甘坚持自己的坚持，于是他
3、成了“神”。影片中还有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南战争中失去了双腿。他说他的命运就是战死。然而阿甘却救他，让他活了下来。失去双腿后他开始憎恨生活，生活得很颓废，责怪阿甘当初救了他。然而当他调整心态，去和阿甘一起捕鱼生活，有了收获后，开始感觉到生活的美好。感谢阿甘当初就了他。影片试图通过这个角色告诉观者生活总是美好的。乌云后有彩虹，绝境后有重生。关键是看我们给不给自己一个好心态，一个机会去改变不好的现状。影片试图向观者传达这样一个信息：或许做好我们该做的每一件事，生活就会给我们一个好的回馈。只要有一种坚持就会出现一个奇迹。 Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance,
4、 keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS. He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank thats the meaning of my running.” Say goodbye to foretime and dont stay in-place. Although so many people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick
5、to one thing, Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan saved him and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life, complaining that A Gan sho
6、uldnt save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gans help. The movie is intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and a
7、n opportunity to ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if only there is perseverance. Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评 Its not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animat
8、ed film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2021s rollicking success, I wouldnt have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesnt even ATTEMPT to reach Pixars Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monsters, Inc.s second rate, half
9、wit cousin. Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, its the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and
10、 humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home. Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit
11、 of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. Its like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Act
12、ually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for. Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that were going for here, then I suppose Im all for it. But then there are these
13、 strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, Im not even sure the CGI they use here is up to thetask of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble tot
14、em poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. Its laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the storys attempts at heartfelt, soft touches. Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result
15、, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romanos vocal talents arent particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation. The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The films only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Ages comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless youre under 5,
