《浅析《愤怒的葡萄》中汤姆的转变本科论文》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《浅析《愤怒的葡萄》中汤姆的转变本科论文（48页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、本科生毕业论文（设计）册 学院 汇华学院 专业 英语专业 班级 2007级9班 学生 赵兴凯 指导教师 南方 河北师范大学本科毕业论文（设计）任务书编 号： 2011230401339 论文（设计）题目： 浅析愤怒的葡萄中汤姆的转变 学 院： 汇华学院 专业： 英语 班级： 2007级9班 学生姓名： 赵兴凯 学号： 2007512264 指导教师： 南方 职称： 副教授 1、 论文（设计）研究目标及主要任务研究目标：通过对目标人物转变的分析，加深对作品的理解，通过对人物转变原因的分析，体会作者的人物塑造技巧主要任务：研究目标人物的转变及其转变的原意 2、 论文（设计）的主要内容汤姆的转变及其
2、转变的原因，转变主要涉及汤姆由一个个人主义者变为一个集体主义者，由一个无信仰的囚徒变为一个坚持信仰的信徒。3、 论文（设计）的基础条件及研究路线基础条件：对作品的整体阅读，对人物命运的具体研究，对背景知识的理解和把握研究路线：以人物命运的转变为主线，着力表现时代大背景下的人物命运，4、 主要参考文献1. 斯坦贝克:(愤怒的葡萄，胡仲持译，上海译文出版社，2003年版。2. 常耀信.美国文学简史.天津:南开大学出版社，20033. Benson Jackson. The True Adventures of John Steinbeck. New York:Viking,1984.4. John
3、 Steinbeck. The Grapes of Wrath(New York: Viking,1996),p4285、 计划进度阶段起止日期1确定论文题目和主题3月16日3月23日2确定论文提纲交导师审阅3月24日3月30日3完成初稿，交导师审阅批改3月31日4月20日4审阅，修改，交终稿4月21日5月8日5论文答辩5月下旬指 导 教师： 年 月 日教研室主任： 年 月 日注：一式三份，学院（系）、指导教师、学生各一份河北师范大学本科生毕业论文（设计）开题报告书 汇华 学院 英语 专业 2011 届学生姓名赵兴凯论文（设计）题目浅析愤怒的葡萄中汤姆的转变指导教师南方专业职称副教授所属教研室
4、翻译教研室研究方向英美文学课题论证：通过对作品中人物的分析，得出在时代的大背景下，人物的命运是时代环境和文化环境交织的产物。方案设计：第一章主要介绍汤姆由一个个人主义者变为一个集体主义者，第二章主要介绍汤姆由一个囚犯变为一个坚持基督信仰的信徒，第三章主要介绍造成这种转变的原因。进度计划：3月16日3月23日 确定论文题目和主题 3月24日3月30日 确定论文提纲交导师审阅 3月31日4月20日 完成初稿，交导师审阅批改 4月21日5月8日 审阅，修改，交终稿 5月下旬论文答辩指导教师意见： 指导教师签名： 年 月 日教研室意见： 教研室主任签名： 年 月 日河北师范大学本科生毕业论文（设计）文
5、献综述Steinbeck remains one of the Americans most significant writers whose popularity spans the world, whose range is impressive. Among Steinbecks literary works, The Grapes of Wrath endures as a masterpiece of American literature, which played a major role in his winning the Pulitzer Prize and the No
6、bel Prize for Literature. The Grapes of Wrath exerted a tremendous impact on American society when it was published in 1939, and its significance went far beyond the realm of literature. David Watt, a literary critic, once commented, “No American novel published in this century has aroused such a st
7、orm as The Grapes of Wrath did One has to go back to Uncle Toms Cabin to witness its equal.” As a fiction documenting the Dust Bowl migration during the Great Depression, The Grapes of Wrath enjoys a great popularity among American readers, “appealing equally to politicians, intellectuals, literary
8、critics and the general public” During its first yea of publication, more than 400,000 copies of the novel were sold. In 1982, the New York Times reported that it was the second best-selling novel ever in America, with 14,600,000 copies printed. Although The Grapes of Wrath is quite popular with the
9、 readers, literary critics have very controversial views about this work. Right after its publication, it has provoked much hot debates and arguments among critics. As David Minter, an expert of American literature, once pointed out, “The Grapes of Wrath was one of the most influential and controver
10、sial novels of the 1930s.”For this reason, the so-called“Steinbeck Question” was raised by American scholars and it still remains to be solved. Generally speaking, the criticism on this novel has undergone three periods of development.The first period started from 1939 and lasted to the mid 1950s. I
11、n this period, critics tended to focus their attention on the novels relationship with its historical and political background. Some critics regarded it as a protest novel. For example, Malcolm Cowley, a famous critic in the 1930s, claimed that “The Grapes of Wrath belongs very highly in the categor
12、y of the great angry books like Uncle Toms Cabin that had aroused the people to fight against the intolerable wrongs.” And some scholars argued that Steinbeck expresses the traditional American philosophical thought in his novel. Frederic Carpenter published a critical essay in 1941 entitled The Phi
13、losophical Joads. In this essay he contended, “For the first time in history, The Grapes of Wrath brings together and makes real three great skeins of American thought. It combines Ralph Waldo Emersons transcendental over-soul, Whitman mass democracy and William James Pragmatism.”Many other critics
14、categorized Steinbeck as a left writer and labeled The Grapes of Wrath as a “proletarian novel”. They claimed that “the novel depicts the life of the working classes and deals with the industrial problem from the point of view of labor.” Some critics, such as Arthur Spearman, even attacked the novel
