《5.argument模板貌似很万能!.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《5.argument模板貌似很万能!.doc（11页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、1，论据不足，没有具体数据. 2，过分简单得出结论，忽略多种原因. 3, 因果关系错误.模板1. In this argument, the author concludes that_. At first glance, the authors reasoning seems to be appealing, while clearly examining the authors reasoning, we may find that it is unconvincing. The argument contains several facets that are questionable.
2、 First of all, the authors evidences are insufficient to support the conclusion. Obviously, author does not provide enough information on the subjects of the survey/poll. But we are told nothing about the way the poll was conducted and how well it represented the public opinions If the respondents o
3、nly stand for a tiny proportion of the whole group, we should not be so sure about the conclusion that the whole group It was only carried out in Sun City, but the arguer applies its result to all the companys markets while doesnt show us whether Sun City is a representative market of the whole mark
4、ets. The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation betweenOne specific example can not generate the general conclusion. Therefore, facing such limited evidence, the conclusion is unwarranted. Secondly, the author makes an oversimplified analogy between_ and_. In most instances
5、, this is an unwarranted assumption for the simple reason that things rarely remain the same over extended periods of time/from place to place. As we know, many factors should be taken into the consideration, such as demographics of the population, geographical and physical terrain of the two differ
6、ent areas. _. In addition, the author commits “after this, and therefore because of this” fallacy. The causal relationship between the cause of _ and the effect _ is unwarranted. Even if has been proved as a result of , which is, of course, an unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that This is
7、a fallacious reasoning unless the author can provide persuasive evidences to rule out any other possibilities. To sum up, the conclusion lacks of credibility. Regardless of who the author is, he or she has overlooked or chosen to ignore many aspects of his or her conclusion. To strengthen the conclu
8、sion, the author should give more evidences about the above-mentioned possibilities.模板2. In this argument, the arguer advocates that main idea. Although this argument might seem reasonable at first glance, it is in fact ill-conceived. The reasons are stated as follows. In the first place, the arguer
9、 assumes that fallacy 1. Although this is entirely possible, the arguer offers no evidence to substantiate this crucial assumption. It is very likely that reason 1. An appropriate example is not very far to seek. example 1. The arguers reasoning is definitely flawed unless the arguer can convince me
10、 that these and other possible scenarios are unlikely. In the second place, the arguer assumes that fallacy 2. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that it is necessarily the case, and the arguer does not supply any evidence to confirm this assumption. It is quitepossible that reason 2. To illustrate
11、 this point clearly, let us take a look at the following representative example. example 2. Without accounting for and ruling out these and other alternative explanations, the arguer cannot bolster the recommendation. The last but not the least important, even if the evidence turns out to support th
12、e foregoing assumptions, the arguer just simply assumes that fallacy 2 and neither any conclusive scientific evidence nor any anecdotal evidence is provided to affirm this assumption. It is reasonable to doubt that what the arguer assumes will not happen in reality. It is just as possible that reaso
13、n 3. For example, example 3.To reach the cited conclusion, the arguer must explain either why none of these alternatives is available or why none of them is able to sustain. To sum up, the arguers argument mentioned above is not based on valid evidence or sound reasoning, neither of which is dispens
14、able for a conclusive argument. In order to draw a better conclusion, the arguer should reason more convincingly, cite some evidence that is more persuasive, and take every possible consideration into account.呃。怎么样？是不是觉得这是个简单粗暴的模板呢？没有错，我是觉得很简单很粗暴的。你没看到我考场上写的ARGUMENT, 我觉得那个更白。呃。让人着迷的就是光这个全是废话的模板就已然31
15、3字了，再加些简单的句型、粗暴的例子你写不出500字我请你吃饭！食物当然也要简单粗暴，鲍鱼龙虾这种低级的食物就不要吃啦 用这篇简单粗暴的模板，在考场上最需要你动脑想的就是三个逻辑错误。为你赢取时间。 把时间花在刀刃上。 寻找逻辑错误会是你复习ARGUMENT的一个重点。至于每个逻辑错误需要提供的example，越简单，越粗暴，就越好。原因就是想找一个有深度、有哲理、让绝大多数人都信服的理由太难了，别说我们这些外国考生，就连英美作家都很难在短时间内做到。另一个原因就是，即使有一个好理由了，谁去看呢？机器当然看不懂了。那人呢？他看了成千上万的文章。你以为就你的观点好？他什么没见过？而且他还要去看成
16、千上万的文章，哪有时间去细读你的？早晚要简单粗暴，并没有别的出路。 所以就是只要多练只要简单粗暴，就能写好ARGUMENT。 细节技巧and 前后变换顺序main idea 可以写的长一些example 中的话尽量写多，尽量写细，尽量写对，不一定非用for example 剩余时间检查拼写 补充首段 main idea in order to 好/boost (sagging) profits/improve the economic health A should emulate Bs measures补充首段 To bolster the conclusion, the arguer prov
