《外文翻译--外商直接投资模式的解释：基于土耳其汽车产业的分析》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《外文翻译--外商直接投资模式的解释：基于土耳其汽车产业的分析（12页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、中文3265字本科毕业论文外文翻译外文题目：Understanding patterns of FDI: the case of Turkey and its auto industry 出 处：European Business Journal, 15 (2), 2003, pages 61-69 作 者： M. John Foster Ipek Alkan. Ipek 原 文：Patterns of FDI for Turkey: actuality and expectationThe starting point arguably for any aspirant developing
2、 economy in its search for inward foreign investment FDI from the perspective of the investors is the general upswing in aggregate global FDI trends from source economies, which occurs for a variety of well-rehearsed reasons, see e.g. Porter (1990), Buckley (1992) and Dunning (1993). These reasons i
3、nclude: market extension (perhaps because the home market is near saturation); accessing scarce primary products (primarily oil and minerals); production efficiency strategies benefiting from location-specific cost advantages in sink economies; and more or less complex mixtures of these and other fa
4、ctors. For developing economies, the question they may reasonably ask is: Can we get a share of this inflow of capital?Table 1 summarises global patterns of FDI in recent years. It shows a 238% increase in aggregate FDI over the period 1994 to 1999. This comprised a 338% increase in FDI into develop
5、ed countries and a 98% rise in the inflows to developing economies. In short, while there has been significant growth in developing economies, for the developed economies the growth has been much more dramatic. Even China, the much vaunted star of foreign investment, has only performed steadily when
6、 benchmarked against global aggregates. The table shows, using Vietnam as a benchmark, that Turkey has not done very well in aggregate terms when compared with newer emerging economies over the past decade.This simple aggregate pattern is further elaborated by considering the FDI per capita figures
7、shown in Table 2. This clearly suggests that Turkey is missing out in that its per capita performance over the decade shown has been flat while the picture has been one of sharp growth within the other developing economies. The comparison with Vietnam is very stark; Vietnam is a country which had to
8、 re-launch its economy from a very low base after the US removed its block on US companies investment, instituted immediately after its withdrawal from the Vietnam War in 1975.Indeed the flat performance of the 1990s at a time of aggregate global increase is even more notable when compared with the
9、1980s. Data for that period show that the liberalisation-oriented change in regime of the period did indeed produce a positive increase albeit from a low base. Hence the fairly modest average performance around the change of decade (see Table 1) nevertheless marked a five-fold increase on the first
10、couple of years. A corner was turned, so to speak, but was not followed by the expected acceleration.At an aggregate level, the ratio FDIt/GDPt,，where t is the year or period chosen, is sometimes used as an indicator of how well a country is doing in attracting FDI. Is a country getting its share? T
11、he unreliability of source data can be a problem but the ratio is likely to be fairly robust certainly to an order of magnitude. Based on data from the UN Statistical Yearbook (UN, 2001) and the data in Table 1, in 1999, Turkeys ratio was 0.4, compared with Thailand 5.5, Vietnam 5.8, China 3.8, UK 5
12、.7, and US 3.1. These data suggest that Turkey failed to perform it clearly did not get a relative share, whether compared with developed or comparable developing countries.Until recently, manufacturing was very important within the pattern of FDI into Turkey, and the biggest subsector therein was t
13、he auto and transport parts industry. Hence the auto industry might be expected to be a particular target for FDI. But actual realised FDI in that sector has been muted in absolute if not internal, comparative terms, as we explain in more detail in the next section: why?We have already stated that T
14、urkeys aggregate FDI performance has been weaker than might be expected based on simple benchmarking around the size of the countrys population and GDP. An examination of some of the key elements of the countrys business environment would tend to suggest that the expectation might well be for a stro
15、nger performance than that found.First of all there is its favourable geographical position. Turkey sits at the northeast corner of the Mediterranean. As such, it: abuts the EU via its current most easterly element, Greece (and has its customs union with the EU), has borders with oil rich Iran and I
16、raq and moregenerally can be seen as well placed to serve the growing Middle East market, and has immediate access to a number of ex-Comecon economies either via direct land borders or by sea via Black Sea ports it controls the Bosphorus, which is the gateway to the Black Sea.Three more positive factors can be readily identified, all of which might be thought
