《2015年MBA英语英译汉题型训练及参考译文》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2015年MBA英语英译汉题型训练及参考译文（7页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2015年MBA英语英译汉题型训练及参考译文 太奇MBA为2015年 MBA备考考生们整理MBA英语翻译题型练习题（英译汉）及参考译文，希望MBA考生们可以借助试题提高解题速度。一。Rumor has it that more than 20 books on creationism/evolution are in the publishers pipelines. A few have already appeared. The goal of all will be to try to explain to a confused and often unenlightened citiz
2、enry that there are not two equally valid cientific theories for the origin and evolution of universe and life. Cosmology, geology, and iology have provided a consistent, unified, and constantly improving account of what happened. Scientific creationism, which is being pushed by some for equal time
3、in the classrooms whenever the scientific accounts of evolution are given, is based on religion, not science. Virtually all scientists and the majority of non-fundamentalist religious leaders have come to regard scientific creationism as bad science and bad religion.The first four chapters of Kitche
4、rs book give a very brief introduction to evolution. At appropriate places, he introduces the criticisms of the creationists and provides answers. In the last three chapters, he takes off his gloves and gives the creationists a good beating. He describes their programmes and tactics, and, for those
5、unfamiliar with the ways of creationists, the extent of their deception and distortion may come as an unpleasant surprise. When their basic motivation is religious, one might have expected more Christian behavior.Kitcher is philosopher, and this may account, in part, for the clarity And fectiveness
6、of his arguments. The non-specialist will be able to obtain at least a notion of the sorts of data and argument that support evolutionary theory. The final chapter on the creationists will be extremely clear to all. On the dust jacket of this fine book, Stephen Jay Gould says: This book stands for r
7、eason itself. And so it does - and all would be well were reason the only judge in the creationism/evolution debate.参考译文：进化论据传言有20多本关于神创论/进化论的书已经在出版商的印刷厂里了。其中的几本已经面市了，出版这些书的目的就是向那些未被启蒙的处于混乱之中的人们揭示并没有两种相等的可用的科学理论来解释宇宙和人的起源和进化。宇宙学，地质学生物学已经为过去发生的事情提供了一个固定的统一的并且不断发展的解释。科学的神创论建立在宗教而不是科学的基础上的，实际上所有的科学家和非原
8、教主义的大多数人已经逐渐将科学的神创论看作是坏的科学和宗教。K的书的前四章，把进化论做了一个简明的介绍。在合适的地方他引进了对神创论的评判并提供解答。在最后三章里，他取下拳击手套，给与神创论者重重的打击。他描述神创论的程序和策略，并且对那些不熟悉神创论者行为方式的人而言，神创论者的欺骗和歪曲会令他们有不愉快的惊奇。当他们的动机是宗教时，一个人可能用行为。K是一位哲学家，也许者也可以部分的说明他论述的条理清晰性和有效性。非专业人士也至少通过一系列数据和争论得到进化论的观点。在神创论的最后一章这个更为清晰。在这本书的包装封面上写道：这本书代表了理性。 二。Its a rough world out
9、 there. Step outside and you could break a leg slipping on your doormat. Light up the stove and you could burn down the house. Luckily， if the doormat or stove failed to warn of coming disaster， a successful lawsuit might compensate you for your troubles. Or so the thinking has gone since the early
10、1980s， when juries began holding more companies liable for their customers misfortunes.Feeling threatened， companies responded by writing ever-longer warning labels， trying to anticipate every possible accident. Today， stepladders carry labels several inches long that warn， among other things， that
11、you might - surprised! - fall off. The label on a childs Batman cape cautions that the toy “does not enable user to fly.”While warnings are often appropriate and necessary - the dangers of drug interactions， for example - and many are required by state or federal regulations， it isnt clear that they
12、 actually protect the manufacturers and sellers from liability if a customer is injured. About 50 percent of the companies lose when injured customers take them to court.Now the tide appears to be turning. As personal injury claims continue as before， some courts are beginning to side with defendant
13、s， especially in cases where a warning label probably wouldnt have changed anything. In May， Julie Nimmons， president of Schutt Sports in Illinois， successfully fought a lawsuit involving a football player who was paralyzed in a game while wearing a Schutt helmet. “Were really sorry he has become pa
14、ralyzed， but helmets arent designed to prevent those kinds of injuries，” says Nimmons. The jury agreed that the nature of the game， not the helmet， was the reason for the athletes injury.At the same time， the American Law Institute - a group of judges， lawyers， and academics whose recommendations ca
15、rry substantial weight - issued new guidelines for tort law stating that companies need not warn customers of obvious dangers or bombard them with a lengthy list of possible ones. “Important information can get buried in a sea of trivialities，” says a law professor at Cornell Law School who helped d
16、raft the new guidelines. If the moderate end of the legal community has its way， the information on products might actually be provided for the benefit of customers and not as protection against legal liability. 参考译文：外面是一个危险的世界。出门的时候你可能被踏脚垫绊倒摔断腿，点燃火炉的时候你可能烧掉房子。幸运的是如果踏脚垫或者火炉没有能提醒你可能带来的灾难，那么一场成功的法律诉讼可以补偿一下你的麻烦的损失。在20世纪80年代早期这种就有了这种想法，那时候陪审团开始让公司为其顾客的不幸承担更多的责任。感觉到这种威胁的存在，公司开始用写的很长的警告标签来作出反映，试图预料每一种可能的事故。今天四角梯
