《全球首次完成杨树全基因组测序(共4页)》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《全球首次完成杨树全基因组测序(共4页)（4页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、精选优质文档-倾情为你奉上全球首次完成杨树全基因组测序由美国能源部启动并实施的杨树全基因组测序计划已圆满完成，并于2004年9月21日对公众开放了全序列数据库。南京林业大学科研人员尹佟明副教授参与了此项研究。杨树基因组的新闻发布及庆祝会定于12月6日在美国加州举行。该项研究可望使杨树这一重要树种的品种改良时间大大缩短，用区区几十年跨越千年关。 研究的完成，使杨树成为继拟南芥和水稻之后，第三个测定全序列的植物，并且是第一个测定全基因组序列的多年生木本植物。杨树因此被广泛接受为研究多年生植物基因组的模式物种，这使该项工作具有重大的科学意义。杨树同时又是一种重要的工业用材树种，杨树全基因组计划实施，
2、将为生物能源的开发提供知识贮备，具有重要的实际应用价值。目前，杨树的改良还处在一种半野生的初级改良阶段，在基因组研究的基础上，通过群体和数量遗传学的手段在杨树属不同树种间开发有用等位基因，并通过遗传工程的手段进行基因重组，可望在几十年的时间里完成一般作物几千年的改良历程。 杨树全基因组全序列用“鸟枪法测定”，序列库中共含有7，649，993个序列片段，去除叶绿体基因组的污染，测得的序列大约为8基因组长度。目前对序列拼接的组装已完成了483Mb，占杨树基因组物理全长的90%以上，基本上覆盖了杨树基因组常染色体的大部分。基于基因芯片和单核苷酸多态性检测技术，对小的序列拼接及序列间隙的填充工作正在进
3、行中，预期这部分工作将于明年完成。南京林业大学尹佟明副教授自2001年以来一直参与此项研究，对杨树基因组的注释工作将于今年12月初完成。 国际杨树基因组计划协作组的总负责人杰瑞先生认为，从世界范围来看，杨树在中国的林业生产中占有的比重是最大的，因此在杨树基因组信息的应用方面，中国在未来的研究中可能会居于世界前列。杨树全基因组计划的完成对我国从事林业及生物技术的科学家而言，提供了前所未有的机遇和挑战。Science 15 September 2006:Vol. 313. no. 5793, pp. 1596 - 1604DOI: 10.1126/science.RESEARCH ARTICLES
4、The Genome of Black Cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) G. A. Tuskan,1,3* S. DiFazio,1,4 S. Jansson,5 J. Bohlmann,6 I. Grigoriev,9 U. Hellsten,9 N. Putnam,9 S. Ralph,6 S. Rombauts,10 A. Salamov,9 J. Schein,11 L. Sterck,10 A. Aerts,9 R. R. Bhalerao,5 R. P. Bhalerao,12 D. Blaudez,13 W. Boer
5、jan,10 A. Brun,13 A. Brunner,14 V. Busov,15 M. Campbell,16 J. Carlson,17 M. Chalot,13 J. Chapman,9 G.-L. Chen,2 D. Cooper,6 P. M. Coutinho,19 J. Couturier,13 S. Covert,20 Q. Cronk,7 R. Cunningham,1 J. Davis,22 S. Degroeve,10 A. Djardin,23 C. dePamphilis,18 J. Detter,9 B. Dirks,24 I. Dubchak,9,25 S.
6、Duplessis,13 J. Ehlting,7 B. Ellis,6 K. Gendler,26 D. Goodstein,9 M. Gribskov,27 J. Grimwood,28 A. Groover,29 L. Gunter,1 B. Hamberger,7 B. Heinze,30 Y. Helariutta,12,31,33 B. Henrissat,19 D. Holligan,21 R. Holt,11 W. Huang,9 N. Islam-Faridi,34 S. Jones,11 M. Jones-Rhoades,35 R. Jorgensen,26 C. Josh
7、i,15 J. Kangasjrvi,32 J. Karlsson,5 C. Kelleher,6 R. Kirkpatrick,11 M. Kirst,22 A. Kohler,13 U. Kalluri,1 F. Larimer,2 J. Leebens-Mack,21 J.-C. Lepl,23 P. Locascio,2 Y. Lou,9 S. Lucas,9 F. Martin,13 B. Montanini,13 C. Napoli,26 D. R. Nelson,36 C. Nelson,37 K. Nieminen,31 O. Nilsson,12 V. Pereda,13 G
8、. Peter,22 R. Philippe,6 G. Pilate,23 A. Poliakov,25 J. Razumovskaya,2 P. Richardson,9 C. Rinaldi,13 K. Ritland,8 P. Rouz,10 D. Ryaboy,25 J. Schmutz,28 J. Schrader,38 B. Segerman,5 H. Shin,11 A. Siddiqui,11 F. Sterky,39 A. Terry,9 C.-J. Tsai,15 E. Uberbacher,2 P. Unneberg,39 J. Vahala,32 K. Wall,18
9、S. Wessler,21 G. Yang,21 T. Yin,1 C. Douglas,7 M. Marra,11 G. Sandberg,12 Y. Van de Peer,10 D. Rokhsar9,24 We report the draft genome of the black cottonwood tree, Populus trichocarpa. Integration of shotgun sequence assembly with genetic mapping enabled chromosome-scale reconstruction of the genome
10、. More than 45,000 putative protein-coding genes were identified. Analysis of the assembled genome revealed a whole-genome duplication event; about 8000 pairs of duplicated genes from that event survived in the Populus genome. A second, older duplication event is indistinguishably coincident with th
11、e divergence of the Populus and Arabidopsis lineages. Nucleotide substitution, tandem gene duplication, and gross chromosomal rearrangement appear to proceed substantially more slowly in Populus than in Arabidopsis. Populus has more protein-coding genes than Arabidopsis, ranging on average from 1.4
12、to 1.6 putative Populus homologs for each Arabidopsis gene. However, the relative frequency of protein domains in the two genomes is similar. Overrepresented exceptions in Populus include genes associated with lignocellulosic wall biosynthesis, meristem development, disease resistance, and metabolit
13、e transport. 1 Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.2 Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.3 Plant Sciences Department, University of Tennessee, TN 37996, USA.4 Department of Biology, West Virginia Univers
14、ity, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.5 Ume Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant Physiology, Ume University, SE-901 87, Ume, Sweden.6 Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.7 Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4,
15、 Canada.8 Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.9 U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.10 Department of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Ghent University
16、, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.11 Genome Sciences Centre, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada.12 Ume Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Ume, Sweden.13 Tree-Microbe Interactions Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)Universit Henri Poincar, INRA-Nancy, 54280 Champenoux, France.14 Department of Forestry, Virginia
