2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期

上传人:桔**** 文档编号:494333379 上传时间:2023-10-07 格式:DOCX 页数:30 大小:31.36KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期_第1页
第1页 / 共30页
2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期_第2页
第2页 / 共30页
2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期_第3页
第3页 / 共30页
2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期_第4页
第4页 / 共30页
2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期_第5页
第5页 / 共30页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第148期(30页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、2022年考博英语-东北财经大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)1. 单选题Scarcely had the boat reached the open water _ it encountered high winds and heavy seas.问题1选项A.thanB.asC.whenD.since【答案】C【解析】【选项释义】A. than 比 B. as 当时候C. when 当时候 D. since 自从时候【答案】C【考查点】固定搭配【解题思路】句首有scarcely“几乎不”,并且scarcely引导的句子使用了过去完成时,句意为“船驶到开阔的水域”;空格处为后半句的引导词

2、,引导的句子使用的是一般过去时,句意为“它遇到了大风浪”,由此可知,本题考查的是固定搭配scarcelywhen“一就”。因此,C选项when“当时候”符合要求。【干扰项排除】A、B、D选项不符合原句搭配。【句意】船刚开到开阔的水域,就遇到了大风浪。2. 单选题What a relief it was when the boulders suddenly disappeared, _ to a stretch of plain where the only obstacles were clumps of bushes.问题1选项A.giving wayB.giving inC.gave wa

3、yD.gave in【答案】A【解析】【选项释义】A. giving way 让路(现在分词) B. giving in 屈服(现在分词)C. gave way 让路(过去分词) D. gave in 屈服(过去分词)【答案】A【考查点】非谓语动词与语义衔接【解题思路】前文内容为“大石头突然不见了”,后文内容为“一片平地”,根据前后语义可知,大石头没有了,紧接着的是一片平地,大石头给平地让路更符合语义衔接,空格处为非谓语动词,大石头给平地让路,类似于主动关系,应使用现在分词形式。A选项giving way“让路(现在分词)”符合要求。【干扰项排除】B选项giving in“屈服(现在分词)”,

4、不符合原句语义衔接;C选项gave way“让路(过去分词)”,过去分词形式,表被动,原句中不存在被动关系;D选项gave in“屈服(过去分词)”,不符合原句语义衔接。【句意】突然大石头不见了,前面是一片平地,唯一的障碍只有丛生的灌木,这使我们松了一口气。3. 单选题To get my travelers checks I had to _ such a special check to the bank for the total amount.问题1选项A.make forB.make outC.make upD.make over【答案】B【解析】【选项释义】A. make for 前

5、往;造就 B. make out 填写完C. make up 补充;编造;构成 D. make over 转让【答案】B【考查点】词组辨析与动宾搭配【解题思路】空格处所填短语搭配的宾语为“一张特别的支票”,B选项make out“填写完”可以与之搭配,make out a check“填写支票”。【干扰项排除】A、C、D选项与宾语“一张特别的支票”搭配不当。【句意】为了取得全额的旅行支票,我必须给银行开一张特别的支票。4. 单选题In Americans fiercely adversarial legal system, a good lawyer is essential. Ask O.J

6、. Simpson. In a landmark case 35 years ago, Gideon V. Wainwright, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that indigent defendants must be provided with a lawyer at state expense because there could be no fair trial in a serious criminal case without one. At the time, the decision was hailed as a triumph fo

7、r justice, an example of Americas commitment to the ideal of equality before the law.This is the image most Americans still have of their criminal-justice systemthe fairest in the world, in which any defendant, no matter how, gets a smart lawyer who, too often, manages to get the culprit off on a te

8、chnicality. Nothing could be further from the truth. About 80% of people accused of a felony have to depend on a publicly-provided lawyer; but over the past two decades the eagerness of politicians to look harsh on crime, their reluctance to pay for public defenders, and a series of Supreme Court ju

9、dgments restricting the grounds for appeal have made a mockery of Gideon. Today many indigent defendants, including those facing long terms of imprisonment or even death, are treated to a “meetem and pleadem” defensea brief consultation in which a harried or incompetent lawyer encourages them to ple

10、ad guilty or, if that fails, struggle through a short trial in which the defense is massively outgunned by a more experienced, better-paid and better-prepared prosecutor.“We have a wealth-based system of justice,” says Stephen Bright, the director of the Southern Center for Human Right. “For the wea

11、lthy, its gold-plated. For the average poor person, its like being herded to the slaughter-house. In many places the adversarial system barely exists for the poor.”Many lawyers, of course, have made heroic efforts for particular defendants for little or no pay, but the charity of lawyers can be reli

12、ed on to handle only a tiny fraction of cases. As spending on police, prosecutors and prisons has steadily climbed in the past decade, increasing the number of people charged and imprisoned, spending on indigent defense has not kept pace, overwhelming an already hard-pressed system.1. The word “indi

13、gent” (Paragraph 1) most probably means _.2. It can be inferred from the passage that O.J. Simpson was probably _.3. What is that authors view of Americas adversarial legal system?4. Which of the following statements is true?5. What is the authors specific purpose in writing this passage?问题1选项A.weal

14、thyB.criminalC.poverty-strickenD.innocent问题2选项A.a person who was found not guilty because he hired a very good lawyerB.a person who won his case because he was provided with a lawyer at state expenseC.a person who was denied a lawyer and thus lost his case in the courtD.a brilliant lawyer who won nu

15、merous cases for the average poor people问题3选项A.It is the embodiment of the ideal of equality before the law.B.It is the fairest criminal-justice system in the world.C.As it is, it benefits the rich but works against the poor.D.It is unfair by nature and should be overhauled.问题4选项A.Lawyers who provide defense for the poor often work heroically for little or no pay at all.B.As crime rate increases, American politicians have become more tolerant towards crime than

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 习题/试题

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号