初一英语电影观后感

上传人:cl****1 文档编号:492589020 上传时间:2022-12-09 格式:DOC 页数:3 大小:20.53KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
初一英语电影观后感_第1页
第1页 / 共3页
初一英语电影观后感_第2页
第2页 / 共3页
初一英语电影观后感_第3页
第3页 / 共3页
亲,该文档总共3页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《初一英语电影观后感》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《初一英语电影观后感(3页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、阿甘正传观后感(中英文对照) 阿甘有自己的坚持,他不断地跑步,JUST RUNS. 他跑步不为任何理由。他说:人要往前看,千万不要被过去拖累。我想我跑步就是这个意义”和过去告别,不停留在原处。也许这世界上太多人随拨逐流,很少人会坚持做一件事,阿甘坚持自己的坚持,于是他成了“神”。影片中还有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南战争中失去了双腿。他说他的命运就是战死。然而阿甘却救他,让他活了下来。失去双腿后他开始憎恨生活,生活得很颓废,责怪阿甘当初救了他。然而当他调整心态,去和阿甘一起捕鱼生活,有了收获后,开始感觉到生活的美好。感谢阿甘当初就了他。影片试图通过这个角色告诉观者生活总是美好的。乌云后有彩虹

2、,绝境后有重生。关键是看我们给不给自己一个好心态,一个机会去改变不好的现状。影片试图向观者传达这样一个信息:或许做好我们该做的每一件事,生活就会给我们一个好的回馈。只要有一种坚持就会出现一个奇迹。 Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS. He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank thats the meaning of my running.” Sa

3、y goodbye to foretime and dont stay in-place. Although so many people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick to one thing, Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. Howe

4、ver, Mr. A Gan saved him and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life, complaining that A Gan shouldnt save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gans help. The movie is intended to tell p

5、eople that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportunity to ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will b

6、e a miracle if only there is perseverance. Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评 Its not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001s rollicking success, I wouldnt have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age

7、doesnt even ATTEMPT to reach Pixars Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monsters, Inc.s second rate, half wit cousin. Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it

8、s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John

9、 Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home. Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly render

10、ed polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. Its like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for. Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one line

11、rs. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that were going for here, then I suppose Im all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, Im not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the

12、task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. Its laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the storys attempts at heartfel

13、t, soft touches. Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romanos vocal talents arent particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo

14、 cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation. The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The films only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding do

15、dos. Ice Ages comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless youre under 5, youll be bored with everything else. 冒牌天神2观后感: This shouldve gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. I

16、t retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesnt work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment. Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (chec

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 中学教育 > 试题/考题 > 初中试题/考题

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号