《2022年考博英语-云南大学考前提分综合测验卷（附带答案及详解）套卷50》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-云南大学考前提分综合测验卷（附带答案及详解）套卷50（27页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-云南大学考前提分综合测验卷（附带答案及详解）1. 单选题（ ）the lives they stole, our enemies failed to stop us from achieving a single one of our strategic objectives in Iraq.问题1选项A.But forB.For allC.As forD.What for【答案】B【解析】考查语义关系。A选项but for “要不是、如果没有”；B选项for all “尽管、虽然”；C选项as for “至于、关于”；D选项what for “为什么、为何目的”，句意为：
2、尽管敌人夺走了我们的生命，但他们没能阻止我们实现在伊拉克的任何一个战略目标。因此选项B符合题意。2. 翻译题1.书籍引导我们进入优秀的社会群体，将我们带到伟大的思想家面前。2.这些不同文化背景的年轻人都具有共同的爱好，喜欢同样的服饰、音乐和娱乐。3.名声、财富和权利都是身外之物，人人可求而得之，但没有人能代替你感受人生。4.中国坚持以人为本的科学发展观，着力构建和谐社会。5.一个时代展现在我们面前；政治更加民主，社会全面进步，人们生活进一步提高。【答案】1.Books guide us into good social groups and bring us to great thinkers
3、.2.These young people from different cultural backgrounds all have common hobbies and like the same clothes, music and entertainment.3.Fame, wealth and power are worldly possessions that can be acquired by all, but no one can feel life for you.4.China adheres to the people-oriented scientific concep
4、t of development and strives to build a harmonious society.5. An era is unfolding before us; politics is more democratic, society is progressing in an all-round way, and peoples lives are further improved.3. 单选题The technique provides more detailed information about subtle differences in gene activit
5、y（ ）with cancer-causing pathways.问题1选项A.coupledB.stainedC.associatedD.integrated【答案】C【解析】考查动词辨析。A选项couple“连接、成对”；B选项stain“玷污、弄脏的”；C选项associate“联想、联系”；D选项integrate“使结合、使完整”，句意为：这项技术提供了更多有关于基因活性与致癌途径细微差异的详细信息。be associated with“与有关，与有关系”，因此选项C正确。4. 单选题The concept of personal choice（ ）health behaviors
6、is an important one.问题1选项A.in face ofB.in case ofC.in relation toD.in charge of【答案】C【解析】考查短语辨析。A选项in face of“面对、面临”；B选项in case of“假如、万一”；C选项in relation to“关于、涉及”；D选项in charge of“负责、掌管”，句意：个人选择与健康行为的关系是一个重要的概念。个人选择与健康行为是相关的关系，因此选项C符合题意。5. 单选题Some of the old customs have continued（ ）politeness althoug
7、h they are no longer thought about now.问题1选项A.in the way ofB.in the eyes ofC.in the face ofD.in the form of【答案】D【解析】考查短语辨析。A选项in the way of“妨碍、在方面”；B选项in the eyes of “在心目中、从来看”；C选项in the face of“面对、不顾”；D选项in the form of “以的形式”，句意为：有些旧习俗以礼貌的形式继续存在着，尽管它们现在已经不再被人想到了。in the form of“以的形式”符合题意，因此D选项正确。6.
8、单选题It used to be so straightforward. A team of researchers working together in the laboratory would submit the results of their research to a journal. A journal editor would then remove the authors names and affiliations from the paper and send it to their peers for review. Depending on the comments
9、 received, the editor would accept the paper for publication or decline it. Copyright rested with the journal publisher, and researchers seeking knowledge of the results would have to subscribe to the journal.No longer. The Internet and pressure from funding agencies, who are questioning why commerc
10、ial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it is making access to scientific results a reality. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this. The report, by Jo
11、hn Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD, makes heavy reading for publishers who have, so far, made handsome profits. But it goes further than that. It signals a change in what has, until now, been a key element of scientific endeavor.The value of knowledge and
12、the return on the public investment in research depends, in part, upon wide distribution and ready access. It is big business. In America, the core scientific publishing market is estimated at between $7 billion and $11 billion. The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publ
13、ishers says that there are more than 2,000 publishers worldwide specializing in these subjects. They publish more than 1.2 million articles each year in some 16,000 journals.This is now changing. According to the OECD report, some 75% of scholarly journals are now online. Entirely new business model
14、s are emerging; three main ones were identified by the reports authors. There is the so-called big deal, where institutional subscribers pay for access to a collection of online journal titles through site-licensing agreements. There is open-access publishing, typically supported by asking the autho
15、r (or his employer) to pay for the paper to be published. Finally, there are open-access archives, where organizations such as universities or international laboratories support institutional repositories. Other models exist that are hybrids of these three, such as delayed open-access, where journals allow only subscribers to read a paper for the first six months, before making it freely available to everyone who wishes to see it. All this could change the traditional form of the peer-review process, at least for the publication of papers.1.In the first paragraph,
