整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer

上传人:鲁** 文档编号:486119287 上传时间:2022-08-04 格式:DOC 页数:30 大小:137.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer_第1页
第1页 / 共30页
整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer_第2页
第2页 / 共30页
整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer_第3页
第3页 / 共30页
整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer_第4页
第4页 / 共30页
整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer_第5页
第5页 / 共30页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《整理版高中英语PassageOneTheAffectofElectricityonCancer(30页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、Passage One The Affect of Electricity on CancerCan electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagn

2、etic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other maligna ncies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because

3、evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimateor the worst kind of paranoia. Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the

4、executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence “suggests a casual link between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic

5、fieldsthose having very longwave-lengthsand leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as “a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. The report is no reason to p

6、anicor even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the Whit House. But now no one can deny t

7、hat the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed. At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, tit generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many year

8、s, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earths own magnetic field, The electric fields

9、 surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate. How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The con

10、sensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such “ionizing radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer ris

11、ks and there are regulations to control emissions. But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mech

12、anism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found. The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having “biased the entire document toward proving a link. “Our reviewers are convinc

13、ed that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer, the Air Force concludes. “It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. Then Pentagons concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military

14、 that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. 1. The main idea of this passage is A. studies on the cause of cancerB. controversial view-points in the cause of cancerC. the r

15、elationship between electricity and cancer. D. different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner. 2. The view-point of the EPA is A. there is casual link between electricity and cancer. B. electricity really affects cancer. C. controversial. D. low frequency electromagnetic field is a possibl

16、e cause of cancer3. Why did the Pentagon and Whit House object to the release of the report? Because A. it may stir a great deal of debate among the Bush Administration. B. every unit of the modern military has depended on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment. C. the Pentagons concern was understandable. D. they had different arguments. 4. It can be inferred from physical phenomenon

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 办公文档 > 工作计划

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号