《2022年考博英语-沈阳药科大学考前拔高综合测试题（含答案带详解）第6期》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-沈阳药科大学考前拔高综合测试题（含答案带详解）第6期（33页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-沈阳药科大学考前拔高综合测试题（含答案带详解）1. 单选题She is a very _ student. Shes always talking about traveling to outer space.问题1选项A.imaginaryB.imaginativeC.imaginableD.imagining【答案】B【解析】考查形容词辨析与上下文语义。A选项imaginary“虚构的，想象的”；B选项imaginative“富有想象力的；有创造力的”；C选项imaginable“可能的；可想象的”；D选项imagining“想象，动词imagine的现在分词形式”。句
2、意：她是一个非常_的学生。她总是说要去外太空旅行。根据她经常谈论的内容推断，她是一个充满想象力的学生，B选项最符合句意。因此，本题最佳选项为B。2. 单选题Film-makers work very closely with scientists whose work studying the complexity of animal lives is vital for wildlife conservation.问题1选项A.reservationB.utilizationC.dedicationD.protection【答案】D【解析】【选项释义】A. reservation 预订；保留
3、地 B. utilization 利用，使用C. dedication 奉献 D. protection 保护【考查点】名词辨析【解题思路】与原词搭配的是“野生动物”，原词conservation“保护”，指野生动物保护，D选项protection“保护”，与原词最接近。【干扰项排除】A选项reservation“预订；保留地”，与原词是形近词，但两者意义不同；B选项utilization“利用，使用”，没有依据，且利用野生动物，不符合语境；C选项dedication“奉献”，没有依据，且奉献野生动物，不搭配。【句意】电影制作人与科学家密切合作，这些科学家研究动物生活的复杂性，对野生动物保护至
4、关重要。3. 单选题The American military tribunals set up to pass judgment on terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay lurched into life this week when David Hicks, the “Australian Taliban”, unexpectedly pleaded guilty. The Pentagon will be relieved that the tribunals have started to show results after five year
5、s of controversy over the status of “enemy combatants”, claims of torture, the admissibility of forced confessions and a Supreme Court ruling last year that halted an earlier version of the tribunals. Yet the Hicks case is hardly an impressive start for Americas offshore justice. Critics say the 31-
6、year-old Mr. Hicks, a former kangaroo skinner and alleged al-Qaeda fighter, faces a “kangaroo court”. Two of his civilian lawyers were barred from the hearing on March 26th. His military lawyer, Major Michael Mori, has been threatened with prosecution for harshly criticizing the tribunals.The prosec
7、utor, Colonel Morris Davis, said the defence lawyer may have breached military law that bans officers from using “contemptuous words” against the president or senior officials. Major Mori filed a counter-charge against the prosecution, saying it trying to intimidate him. In the end the motion will n
8、ot be heard because Mr. Hicks, looking pale and bedraggled, admitted the charge of “providing material support for terrorism”. A charge of “attempted murder in violation of the laws of war” was dropped. As The Economist went to press, the tribunal was due to hear details of his plea and pass sentenc
9、e, which Mr. Hicks is expected to serve out in Australia. His father, Terry Hicks, said his son had had “five years of absolute hell” since being captured in Afghanistan and allegedly suffering beatings, rape and forced injections in American custody accusations rejected by the Pentagon. The guilty
10、plea was just “a way to get home”, said Mr. Hickss father.Many in Australia regard Mr. Hicks as more of a lost soul than a dangerous terrorist. Indeed, his charge sheet portrays him as little more than an al-Qaeda foot-soldier, and a poor one at that. His jihadi CV is pitiful compared with the evide
11、nce being given by some of the 14 “high value detainees” belatedly brought to Guantnamo from CIA secret prisons in September. They include al-Qaedas operational chief, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who in a closed hearing to determine whether he was an “enemy combatant” earlier this month boasted that he
12、had organized the September 11th attacks “from A to Z”，and 30 other plots. Meanwhile, Ahmed Ghalfan Ghailani and Waleed bin Atttash, from Tanzania and Yemen respectively, have admitted supplying equipment for the bombing of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998.Many of these big names
13、 will face trial, and perhaps the death penalty. But the tribunals are expected to try only 60-80 of the more than 380 prisoners currently in Guantanamo. Over the years hundreds of detainees have been sent back to their countries, where some have been jailed and most have been released and sometimes
14、 re-arrested. The Bush Administration says it wants to phase out and eventually close the jail. But it is unlikely to do so for some years either because it lacks the evidence to prosecute detainees (even under the more lax military rules it is using), or because other countries are unwilling to tak
15、e them back.46. What does the author intend to illustrate with the Hicks case?47. What can we infer from the second paragraph?48. What does “kangaroo court” (Line 8, Paragraph 1) mean?49. The fourth paragraph suggests that _.50. Which of the following is TRUE according to the text?问题1选项A.The case is
16、 not encouraging in promoting Americas justice outside the country.B.The Pentagon is finally beginning to work effectively to try the detainees of its anti-terrorist war.C.The detainees are not supposed to have civilian lawyers, while only military lawyers are allowed.D.The fact that the Pentagon has been involved in a series
