《2022年考博英语-中国矿业大学考前提分综合测验卷（附带答案及详解）套卷37》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-中国矿业大学考前提分综合测验卷（附带答案及详解）套卷37（26页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-中国矿业大学考前提分综合测验卷（附带答案及详解）1. 单选题Teenagers in the 1950s, who had to（ ）an increasingly atomized family life and domestic and international tensions, scorned the sterile version of American life.问题1选项A.injureB.conjureC.confrontD.inflow【答案】C【解析】考查动词词义辨析。句意：二十世纪五十年代的青少年，必须去面对破碎的家庭，国内外的紧张，从而蔑视这种枯燥
2、无味的美国生活。injure “受伤”；conjure “恳求，祈求”；confront “面对”；inflow “流入”。根据句意，选项C符合题意。2. 单选题Americans today dont place a very high value on intellect. Our heroes arc athletes, entertainers, and entrepreneurs, not scholars. Even our schools are where we send our children to get a practical educationnot to pursu
3、e knowledge for the sake of knowledge. Symptoms of pervasive anti-intellectualism in our schools arent difficult to find.“Schools have always been in a society where practical is more important than intellectual”, says education writer Diane Ravitcli. “Schools could be a counterbalance.” Ravitchs la
4、test book, Left Back: A Century of Failed School Reforms, traces the roots of anti-intellectualism in our schools, concluding they are anything but a counterbalance to the American distaste for intellectual pursuits.But they could and should be. Encouraging kids to reject the life of the mind leaves
5、 them vulnerable to exploitation and control. Without the ability to think critically, to defend their ideas and understand the ideas of others, they cannot fully participate in our democracy. Continuing along this path, says writer Earl Shorris, “We will become a second-rate country. We will have a
6、 less civil society.”“Intellect is resented as a form of power or privilege,” writes historian and Professor Richard Hofstadter in Anti- Intellectualism in American life, a Pulitzer Prize winning book on the roots of anti-intellectualism in US politics, religion, and education. From the beginning of
7、 our history, says Hofstadter, our democratic and populist urges have driven us to reject anything that smells of elitism. Practicality, common sense, and native intelligence have been considered more noble qualities than anything you could learn from a book.Ralph Waldo Emerson and other Transcenden
8、talist philosophers thought schooling and rigorous book learning put unnatural restraints on children; “We are shut up in schools and college recitation rooms for 10 or 15 years and come out at last with a bellyful of words and do not know a thing.” Mark Twains Huckleberry Finn exemplified American
9、anti-intellectualism. Its hero avoids being civilizedgoing to school and learning to read, so he can preserve his innate goodness.Intellect, according to Hofstadter, is different from native intelligence, a quality we reluctantly admire. Intellect is the critical creative and contemplative side of t
10、he mind. Intelligence seeks grasp, manipulate, re-order, and adjust, while intellect examines, ponders, wonders, theorizes, criticizes and imagines.School remains a place where intellect is mistrusted. Hofstader says our countrys educational system is in the grips of people who joyfully and militant
11、ly proclaim their hostility to intellect and their eagerness to identify with children who show the least intellectual promise.”1.What do American parents expect their children to acquire in school?2.We can learn from the text that Americans have a history of（ ）.3.The views of Ravitcli and Emerson o
12、n schooling are（ ）.4.Emerson, according to the text, is probably（ ）.问题1选项A.The habit of thinking independently.B.Profound knowledge of the world.C.Practical abilities for future career.D.The confidence in intellectual pursuits.问题2选项A.undervaluing intellectB.favoring intellectualismC.supporting schoo
13、l reformD.suppressing native intelligence问题3选项A.identicalB.similarC.complementaryD.opposite问题4选项A.a pioneer of education reformB.an opponent of intellectualismC.a scholar in favor of intellectD.an advocate of regular schooling【答案】第1题:C第2题:A第3题:D第4题:B【解析】1.细节事实题。题目问的是“美国家长期望他们的孩子在学校学到什么”。文章第一段第二句提到“甚
14、至我们送孩子去学习知识的学校也不是为了求知” （Even our schools are where we send our children to get a practical educationnot to pursue knowledge for the sake of knowledge），可知美国家长送孩子去学校的目的是培养实践能力，选项C符合题意。2.细节事实题。题目问的是“从文章中我们可以知美国有过一段怎样的历史”。文章第二段第一句话提到“教育作家提出，学校一直处于一个重视实际而轻视才智的社会中”（“Schools have always been in a society w
15、here practical is more important than intellectual”, says education writer Diane Ravitcli），选项A“轻视才智”符合题意。3.推理判断题。题目问的是“Ravitch和Emerson关于学校的观点”。文章第五段第一句话提到爱默生和其他一些超经验主义者认为学校和严格的书本学习禁锢了学生（Ralph Waldo Emerson and other Transcendentalist philosophers thought schooling and rigorous book learning put unnatural restraints on children），由此可见爱默生是不认可所谓的才智主义；文章第二段提到了Ravitcli关于教育的观点，他认为学校应该平衡“实践能力与才智教育”，不能一味重视实践能力，由此可以看书Ravitcli是重视才智的。由此可以看出，这两位的观点是相反的，选项D符合题意。4.推理判断题。题目问的是“根据文章可以得知，爱默生可能”。文章第五段第一句话提到爱默生和其他一些超经验主义者认为学校和严格的书本学习禁锢了学生（Ralph Waldo Emerson and other Transcendentalist philosophers thought
