《2022年考博英语-北京科技大学考试题库及模拟押密卷34（含答案解析）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-北京科技大学考试题库及模拟押密卷34（含答案解析）（19页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-北京科技大学考试题库及模拟押密卷（含答案解析）1. 单选题Some teenagers are so crazy about video games as to play them many hours（ ）, if possible.问题1选项A.on purposeB.on handC.on creditD.on end【答案】D【解析】考查词组辨析。A项on purpose“有目的地，故意地”，B项on hand“在手边，即将发生”，C项on credit“赊账”，D项on end“连续地，竖着”。空格前面提到“有些青少年对电子游戏如此着迷，以至于玩了好几个小时”，由
2、此可知空格部分表示“时间上持续地，连续地”。句意：一些青少年对电子游戏如此着迷，如果可能的话，他们会连续玩上几个小时。因此，该题选择D项正确。2. 单选题Terrorist activities, in whatever forms, are to be denounced by peace-loving people worldwide.问题1选项A.announcedB.forgivenC.condemnedD.despised【答案】C【解析】考查动词辨析。denounce表示“谴责，公然抨击”；A项announce“宣布”，B项forgive“原谅”，C项condemn“谴责，判刑”，
3、D项despise“轻视，鄙视”。句意：任何形式的恐怖主义活动都应受到全世界爱好和平的人民的谴责。根据句意可知，该题选择C项正确。3. 单选题The disagreement over trade restrictions could seriously（ ） relations between the two countries.问题1选项A.tumbleB.jeopardizeC.manipulateD.intimidate【答案】B【解析】考查动词辨析。A项tumble“摔倒，倒塌”，B项jeopardize“危害，使陷危地”，C项manipulate“操作，操纵”，D项intimida
4、te“恐吓，威胁”。根据句子关键词disagreement over trade restrictions（关于贸易限制的分歧）和relations（关系）可猜测，空格部分表示“贸易分歧恶化了关系”，因此四个选项中只有jeopardize符合。句意：贸易限制问题上的分歧可能严重危及两国关系。因此，该题选择B项正确。4. 单选题The country carried on nuclear tests without feeling apprehensive about the consequences.问题1选项A.optimisticB.anxiousC.uncertainD.scared【答
5、案】B【解析】考查形容词辨析。apprehensive表示“忧虑的，不安的”；A项optimistic“乐观的”，B项anxious“焦虑的”，C项uncertain“不确定的”，D项scared“害怕的”。句意：这个国家进行了核试验，并不担心其后果。根据句意可知，选择B项正确。5. 单选题Connie was told that if she worked too hard, her health would（ ）.问题1选项A.deteriorateB.descendC.degradeD.decay【答案】A【解析】考查动词辨析。A项deteriorate“恶化，变坏”，B项descend
6、“下降，下去”，C项degrade“贬低，使降级”，D项decay“衰退，衰减”，表示社会、机构、制度等方面的衰退。根据前面的关键词health（健康），可猜测空格部分应该表示“变坏，变差”。句意：康妮被告知，如果她工作太辛苦，她的身体会变坏。故该题选择A项正确。6. 单选题Public distrust of scientists stems in part from the blurring of boundaries between science and technology, between discovery and manufacture. Most governments, p
7、erhaps all governments, justify public expenditure on scientific research in terms of the economic benefits the scientific enterprise has brought in the past and will bring in the future. Politicians remind their voters of the splendid machines “our scientists” have invented, the new drugs to reliev
8、e old ailments, and the new surgical equipment and techniques by which previously intractable (难治疗的) conditions may now be treated and lives saved. At the same time, the politicians demand the scientists that they tailor their research to “economics needs” that they award a higher priority to resear
9、ch proposals that are “near the market” and can be translated into the greatest return on investment in the shortest time. Dependent, as they are, on politicians for much of their funding, scientists have little choice but to comply. Like the rest of us, they are members of a society that rates the
10、creation of wealth as the greatest possible good. Many have reservations, but keep them to themselves in what they perceive as a climate hostile to the pursuit of understanding for its own sake and the idea of an inquiring, creative spirit.In such circumstances no one should be too hard on people wh
11、o are suspicious of conflicts of interest. When we learn that the distinguished professor assuring us of the safety of a particular product holds a consultancy with the company making it, we cannot be blamed for wondering whether his fee might conceivably cloud his professional judgment. Even if the
12、 professor holds no consultancy with any firm, some people may still distrust him because of his association with those who do, or at least wonder about the source of his research funding.This attitude can have damaging effects. It questions the integrity of individuals working in a profession that
13、prizes intellectual honesty as the supreme virtue, and plays into the hands of those who would like to discredit scientists by representing them as venal (可以收买的). This makes it easier to dismiss all scientific pronouncements, but especially those made by the scientists who present themselves as “exp
14、erts”. The scientist most likely to understand the safety of a nuclear reactor, for example, is a nuclear engineer. If he declares that a reactor is unsafe, we believe him, because clearly it is not to his advantage to lie about it. If he tells us it is safe, on the other hand, we distrust him, beca
15、use he may well be protecting the employer who pays his salary.1. What is the chief concern of most governments when it comes to scientific research?2. Scientists have to adapt their research to “economic needs” in order to（ ）.3. Why wont scientists complain about the governments policy concerning scientific research?4. According to the author, people are suspicious of the professional judgment of scientists because（ ）.5. Why does the author say that public distrust of scientists can have damaging effects?问题1选项A.Support from the votes.tB.The reduction of
