瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model

上传人:人*** 文档编号:475182519 上传时间:2022-11-22 格式:DOCX 页数:5 大小:64.69KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《瑞士奶酪模型 Swiss Cheese Model(5页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、Accidents, Errors and Swiss CheeseOn Saturday, Asiana Airlines flight 214, a Boeing 777, crashed upon landing at San Francisco Airport. Through a combination of luck and robust aircraft design, only 2 people were killed; a surprising outcome given the photos of the wreckage. Unfortunately, many more

2、 were injured, a number in serious or critical condition. Intense speculation surrounds the cause of the crash, with theories ranging from pilot error to inoperative runway guidance systems to mechanical failure. What is known so far is that the plane made an abnormal final approach, striking its ta

3、il against a sea wall that precedes the runway. Whats unclear is why?The NTSB, the government body in charge of the investigation, has numerous experts on scene. Their process is methodical, sometimes taking years to establish a series of root causes and recommendations following a plane crash. In t

4、his case, the NTSB has a number of factors in its favor. The remaining pieces of the plane are immediately observable, unlike crashes that happen at sea. The black boxes have already been recovered. The crash happened in a populated area, with numerous eyewitnesses as well as video. The crew survive

5、d the crash and will be able to provide important information about the final fateful minutes of the flight.When accidents like Asiana 214 happen, people hunger for immediate and simplistic answers. Our need to feel secure fuels a desire for straightforward explanations that bring closure to mysteri

6、es. Our culture of real-time social media rapidly turns people into aviation experts, investigative sleuths and conspiracy theorists. Unfortunately, armchair speculation is rarely accurate, and ultimately the contributing factors of a crash can be diverse and complex.The intense media focus creates

7、a false sense of insecurity, leading many to feel that commercial air travel is risky. In truth, aviation safety efforts have produced remarkable results commercial air travel is an incredibly safe mode of transportation. Prior to Saturday, the last fatal plane crash on US soil of a commercial jet o

8、f at least regional size was back in 2006. The last previous fatal domestic crash involving a larger, “transatlantic” class jet think 737s and larger was in 2001. During that timeframe there have been 10s of millions of safe, uneventful flights. Much of this is due to the disciplined, evidence-based

9、 approach to safety of modern aviation.One of the foundational safety principles of modern aviation is known as the Swiss cheese model. It is a concept that was first described by the cognitive psychologist and researcher James Reason. In his seminal book Human Error, Reason chronicled a number of f

10、amous disasters, including Three Mile Island and the Challenger space shuttle accident. But instead of merely reviewing the underlying factors of each incident, he proposed an integrated theory of accident causation. Reason had several profound insights: Accidents involving complex systems are often

11、 the result of the confluence of multiple contributing factors. Contributing factors can occur in a wide range of domains from unsafe acts such as a pilot approaching a runway at an improper altitude to organizational errors such as a culture of fiscal austerity that does not prioritize training act

12、ivities. As opposed to the active errors that occur at the time of an incident many contributing factors are in fact latent errors. These latent errors lie dormant, waiting for an active error to turn them into a trigger for an incident. Human beings, lacking unlimited concentration, focus and memor

13、y, will always be prone to operational errors. Properly designed systems account for this limitation, expect a level of human error, and ultimately keep these errors from resulting in an actual incident.Reason summarized his integrated theory of accident causation with an excellent visual known as t

14、he Swiss cheese model.Lets consider the model in the context of an investigation into a a crash landing such as Asiana flight 214. As a disclaimer, this example is not intended to represent a factual analysis of this tragic event. It is simply an example of how the Swiss cheese model can be used by

15、investigators to gain a deeper perspective of the root cause of an accident. Instead of merely focusing on the immediate visible possibilities (e.g. pilot error), the Swiss cheese model forces investigators to look at the latent failures lurking deep within the organizational body.In the case of a c

16、rash landing, examples of unsafe acts could include items such as: Incomplete use of mandatory checklists Insufficient intra-crew or crew-to-tower communicationsStepping back a level is a layer of failures known as preconditions for unsafe acts. A classic example in a plane crash would be fatigue, as when pilots on a long flight have had insufficient sleep. The next layer, unsafe supervision could be represented by the following examples

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 建筑/环境 > 施工组织

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号