《2022年考博英语-厦门大学考前模拟强化练习题66（附答案详解）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-厦门大学考前模拟强化练习题66（附答案详解）（19页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-厦门大学考前模拟强化练习题（附答案详解）1. 单选题Despite much discussion, and efforts by both womens and business groups to break the glass ceiling down, the worlds biggest companies are still almost_run by men.问题1选项A.exceptionallyB.excessivelyC.exclusivelyD.exceedingly【答案】C【解析】exceptionally例外地,异常地; excessively过
2、分地, 极度; exclusively排外地, 专有地; exceedingly非常地, 极度地。句意：尽管女性和商业团体为了打破“玻璃天花板”经过多次讨论并为此付出很多努力，但世界上的大公司仍然几乎完全由男性经营。选项C符合句意。2. 单选题Happiness used to have a much broader meaningtied to the idea of a_and meaningful life一 but now its almost indistinguishable from pleasure.问题1选项A.virtuousB.depravedC.viciousD.mal
3、icious【答案】A【解析】virtuous善良的， 有道德的；depraved堕落的，卑鄙的；vicious恶意的， 刻毒的； malicious蓄意的，恶毒的。句意：在过去, 幸福有一个更广泛的含义与道德高尚和有意义的生活观念紧密联系在一起但现在几乎和快乐无法区分。选项A符合句意。3. 单选题Christmas is a Christian holy day usually celebrated on December 25th_the birth of Jesus Christ.问题1选项A.in accordance withB.in terms ofC.in favor ofD.i
4、n honor of【答案】D【解析】in accordance with根据; in terms of就.而言, 关于; in favor of支持, 赞同; in honor of为庆祝, 向.致敬。句意：圣诞节是基督教的一个神圣的日子, 通常在12月25日庆祝耶稣基督的诞生。选项D符合句意。4. 单选题Our network security solutions are being used by dozens of merchants at hundreds of locations across the country that support PCI_requirements.问题
5、1选项A.complianceB.controversyC.quiescenceD.asseverating【答案】A【解析】compliance遵从, 服从; controversy争论, 辩论; quiescence静止, 沉默; asseverate郑重声明, 断言。句意：我们的网络安全解决方案正被全国各地数百家支持PCI兼容需求的商家所使用。选项A符合句意。5. 单选题Antiwar champion Rep. John Murtha wants to attach conditions on the impending supplemental_bill to fund the wa
6、r.问题1选项A.approbationsB.approximationsC.apprehensionsD.appropriations【答案】D【解析】approbation官方批准, 认可; approximation接近,近似值; apprehension理解,恐惧, 逮捕；appropriation挪用,拨款。句意：反战派共和党员John Murtha希望对即将通过的为战争提供资金的追加拨款法案附加条件。选项D符合句意。6. 单选题First there was a Washington Post article published shortly after the election
7、s on the presumptive new House speaker, Muted Tones of Quiet Authority：A Look Suited to the Speaker. It offered the information that Pelosis suit was by Giorgio Armanithe Italian master of neutral tones and modern power dressingand she wore it well. The article at least appeared in the newspapers St
8、yle section,but was chockfull of psychoanalytic forays into Pelosis wardrobe choices,asserting that an Armani suit,for a woman, is a tool for playing with the boys without pretending to be one. I would wager that Pelosi is one woman who doesnt play around with anyone.Then there was a New York Times
9、article in January in its Thursday Styles section titled Speaking Chic to Power. While noting that Pelosi,barely in her new job a month,had brought the House to votes on a minimum wage increase,stem cell research and Medicare drug prices,the article said she did it looking preternaturally fresh, wit
10、h a wardrobe that .white still subdued and over-reliant on suits, has seldom spruced the halls of Congress.Similar articles appeared in the Baltimore Sun and Chicago Tribune. Mentioned were other women politicians and their fashion choices,such as Sen. Hillary Clintons hair style and preference for
11、black pantsuits or Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultzs haircut. The question is whether focusing on the clothing choices of serious female political players risks rendering them less than serious. Another question is whether such reports warrant precious space. After all,with rare exceptions,male
12、 politicians are seldom scrutinized for their choice of suits.Some reporters and editors havent figured out a way to cover female politicians that doesnt rely on the old stereotypes,says Gail Dines,sociology and womens studies professor at Wheelock College in Boston.To be a woman politician,you have
13、 to strategize and work hard,and yet what matters is what designer youre wearing. Its a way to make women in power less scary, Dines notes.Its putting women into a comfort zone for those who are still baffled by how to treat strong women.The articles seem a throwback to a time when women were only s
14、pouses,not players,says Ruth Mandel, director of the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University. To focus on their attire,the cut of their clothes.is to be in danger of trivializing who they are,the important role they play and the meaning behind womens advancement to positions of power: T
15、hat is, were moving to a true democracy of shared leadership.The problem is the media havent quite caught up. A woman who rises to a leadership position at any level is going to dress appropriately, says Kathleen Hall Jamieson, professor at the Annenberg School of Communications at the University of Pennsylvania. It underscores her competence and is not a distraction. You take for granted that it would not be worthy of comment any more. Jamieson thinks
