《英文论文审稿意见英文版》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《英文论文审稿意见英文版（14页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、英文论文审稿意见汇总1、目标和结果不清晰。It is no ted that your manu script n eeds careful edit ing by some one with expertise in tech ni cal En glish edit ing pay ing particular atte nti on to En glish grammar, spell ing, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究
2、方法或解释不充分。 In gen eral, there is a lack of expla nati on of replicates and statistical me thods used in the study. Furthermore, an expla nati on of why the authors did these various experime nts should be provided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:Also, there are few expla nati ons of the rati on ale for the study
3、desig n.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis n eeds to be prese nted。6、对某个概念或工具使用的rati on ale/定义概念：What was the rati on ale for the
4、 film/SBF volume ratio?7、对研究问题的定义：Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,write one secti on to defi ne the problem&如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.9、对 claim,如 AB 的证明，verification:There is no experimental compariso
5、n of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improveme nt on previous work.10、严谨度问题：MNQ is easier tha n the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.11、格式（重视程度）： In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completel
6、y correct. I have attached a pdf file with I nstructi ons for Authors which shows examples. Before submitt ing a revisi on be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are give n un der the In structi ons
7、and Forms butt on in he upper right-ha nd cor ner of the scree n.12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：有关语言的审稿人意见： It is no ted that your manu script n eeds careful edit ing by some one with expertise in tech ni cal En glish edit ing pay ing particular atte nti on to En glish grammar, spell ing, and sentence structure s
8、o that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper tra nslati on/review ing service before submissi on; only the n can a proper review be performed. Most senten ces contain grammatical an d/or spell ing mistakes or are not complet
9、e senten ces. As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb ten se, and clause con structi on. The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We str ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is
10、well-versed in En glish or whose n ative Ian guage is En glish. Please have some one compete nt in the En glish Ian guage and the subject matte r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ? the quality of En glish n eeds improv ing.来自编辑的鼓励：En courageme nt from reviewers: I would be very glad t
11、o re-review the paper in greater depth once it has been edited because the subject is in teresti ng. There is contin ued int eres t in your manuscrip t titled which you submitted to the Jour nal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - Applied Biomat erials. The Submissi on has bee n greatly impro
12、ved and is worthy of publicati on.老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见Ms. Ref. No.: *Title: *Materials Science and EngineeringDear Dr. *,Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased
13、to reconsider my decision.For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.Reviewer #1: This work proposes an extensive review on micromulsion-based methods for the synthesis of Agnanoparticles. As such, the matter is of interest, however the paper suffers for two serious limits:1) the
14、overall quality of the English language is rather poor;2) some Figures must be selected from previous literature to discuss also the synthesis of anisotropically shaped Ag nanoparticles (there are several examples published), which has been largely overlooked throughout the paper.;Once the above con
15、cerns are fully addressed, the manuscript could be accepted for publication in this journal这是一篇全过程我均比较了解的投稿，稿件的内容我认为是相当不错的，中文版投稿于业内 有较高影响的某核心期刊，并很快得到发表。其时我作为审稿人之一，除了提出一些修改建 议外，还特建议了 5篇应增加的参考文献，该文正式发表时共计有参考文献25篇。作者或许看到审稿意见还不错，因此决意尝试向美国某学会主办的一份英文刊投稿。几经修 改和补充后，请一位英文“功底较好的中国人翻译，投稿后约3周，便返回了三份审稿意 见。从英文刊的反
16、馈意见看，这篇稿件中最严重的问题是文献综述和引用不够，其次是语言表达 方面的欠缺，此外是论证过程和结果展示形式方面的不足。感想：一篇好的论文，从内容到形式都需要精雕细琢。附1：中译审稿意见审稿意见一1(1) 英文表达太差，尽管意思大致能表达清楚，但文法错误太多。(2) 文献综述较差，观点或论断应有文献支持。(3) 论文读起来像是XXX的广告，不知道作者与XXX是否没有关联。(4) 该模式的创新性并非如作者所述，目前有许多XX采取此模式(如美国地球物理学会)， 作者应详加调查并分析XXX运作模式的创新点。(5) 该模式也不是作者所说的那样成功(审稿人结合论文中的数据具体分析)审稿意见一2(1) 缺少直接相关的文献引用(如
