2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)

上传人:s9****2 文档编号:469766026 上传时间:2022-11-25 格式:DOCX 页数:25 大小:24.28KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)_第1页
第1页 / 共25页
2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)_第2页
第2页 / 共25页
2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)_第3页
第3页 / 共25页
2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)_第4页
第4页 / 共25页
2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)_第5页
第5页 / 共25页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷68(附答案带详解)(25页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、2022年考博英语-郑州大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(附答案带详解)1. 单选题One of the important properties of a scientific theory is its abilities to( )further research and further thinking about a particular topic.问题1选项A.stimulateB.renovateC.inventD.advocate【答案】A【解析】考查动词词义辨析。stimulate “起刺激作用”; renovate “更新;修复”;invent “发明,创造”; advoca

2、te “提倡;拥护”。“科学理论的一个重要特征”与后面的“进一步研究”“更深层次的思考”的关系是前者“促进”后者的发生,因此选项A符合题意。2. 单选题It generally thought that as teachers work with students, psychology course work is( ) to teacher-training.问题1选项A.invariablyB.indispensableC.indisposedD.inviolate【答案】B【解析】考查形容词词义辨析。invariably “总是,不变地”; indispensable “不可缺少的”;

3、 indisposed “不舒服的”;inviolate “无污点的”。前半句提到“由于老师与学生共事”,因此“心理学课程是教师培训必不可少的”,选项B符合题意。3. 单选题Parents often faced the( )between doing what they felt was good for the development of the child and what could stand by way of undisciplined noise and destructiveness.问题1选项A.dilemmaB.paradoxC.junctionD.premise【答案

4、】A【解析】考查名词词义辨析。dilemma “困境;进退两难”;paradox “悖论”; junction “连接”;premise “前提,假定”。根据between doing what they felt and what could stand可知家长是在这两种做法为难,因此选项A符合题意。4. 单选题Imagine you found out that ideas invented by a computer were rated higher by independent experts than ideas created by a group of humans asked

5、 to perform the same task. Would you praise the designer of the “creative computer” for a great achievement or would you question why human talent usually so potent in coping with complex cognitive challenges created such poor ideas or maybe you would question your view of the notion of creativity.

6、In fact, such a scenario was played out when we used a simple computerized routine to generate ideas and compared them with ideas invented by human subjects. Why did human judge perceive the computers outcomes as superior to human ideas when they performed the same task?Creativity is considered the

7、ultimate human activity, a highly complex process, difficult to formalize and to control. Although there is a general agreement regarding the distinctive nature of the creative product (idea, painting, poem, and so on), there is a controversy over the nature of the creative process. Some researchers

8、 hold that the creative thinking process is qualitatively different from “ordinary” day-to-day thinking and involves a leap that cannot be formulated, analyzed, or reconstructed the creative spark. Others adopt a reductionist view that creative products are the outcome of ordinary thinking, only qua

9、ntitatively different from everyday thinking.Because creative ideas are different from those that normally arise, people often believe that such ideas require conditions dramatically different from the usual. The notion goes that, in order to overcome mental barriers and reach creative ideas, total

10、freedom is necessary no directional guidance, constraints, criticism from an infinite space during the creativity process. This view prompted the emergence of various idea-generating methods: brainstorming, synectics (共同研究法),lateral thinking (水平思考,横向思维),random stimulation, and so on, all of which co

11、nsist of withholding judgment and relying on analogies from other numbers in the group of on randomly selected analogies. This family of methods relies on the assumption that enhancing randomness, breaking rules and paradigms, and generating anarchy of thought increase the probability of creative id

12、ea emergence.Do these methods work? A number of researchers indicate that they do not. Ideas suggested by individuals working alone are superior to ideas suggested in brainstorming sessions and the performance of problem solvers instructed to break the rules, get out of the square, and change paradi

13、gms” was not better than that of individuals who were not given any instructions at all.The failure of these methods to improve creative outcomes has been explained by the unstructured nature of the task. Reitman observed that many problems that lack a structuring framework are ill-defined in that t

14、he representation of one or more of the basic components the initial state, the operators and constraints and the goal-are seriously incomplete,and the search space is exceedingly large. Indeed, many illdefined problems seem difficult,not because we are swamped by the enormous number of alternative

15、possibilities, but because we have trouble thinking even of one idea worth pursuing.1. Ideas invented by a computer are( ).2. The author thinks that creative thinking is( ).3. According to this passage,( )the probability of creative ideas emergence.4. It is believed that( )tends to improve creative outcomes.问题1选项A.not necessary superior to human ideasB.undoubtedly superior to human ideasC.scarcely superior to human ideasD.generally invented by human subject much earlier问题2选项A.superior to everyday thinkingB.quantitatively different from everyday thinkingC.qualitatively different

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 习题/试题

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号