Is personality determined by nature or nurture

上传人:桔**** 文档编号:458565977 上传时间:2023-05-29 格式:DOCX 页数:5 大小:81.83KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
Is personality determined by nature or nurture_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
Is personality determined by nature or nurture_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
Is personality determined by nature or nurture_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
Is personality determined by nature or nurture_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
Is personality determined by nature or nurture_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《Is personality determined by nature or nurture》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Is personality determined by nature or nurture(5页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、Genetics, not your school, is biggest factor in exam success: DNA twice as significant as environmental factors Study reveals a childs genes have greater impact on exam results than the quality of their school or efforts of their parents Research carried out by Kings College London Echoes London May

2、or Boris Johnsons controversial claims last month that success is linked to IQ Educational achievement owes more to nature than nurture, it is claimedA childs genes have a far greater impact on exam results than the quality of their school or the efforts of their parents, researchers claim.Analysis

3、of 11,000 teenagers GCSE results suggests that DNA is twice as significant as environmental factors such as school choice in determining educational success.The study, published by researchers at Kings College London, will go some way towards swaying the course of the great nature vs nurture debate.

4、It will also bolster the stock of London Mayor Boris Johnson, who last month provoked anger by suggesting that some people, like cornflakes rising to the top of the packet, reach powerful positions because they are naturally more intelligent than others.The new study suggests that each childs genes

5、make, on average, a 58 per cent difference for their results in the core subjects of English, maths and science. Environmental factors such as school, neighbourhood and the family home, are said to have an impact of just 29 per cent. Other factors unique to each individual account for the remaining

6、13 per cent, the study suggests.Genetics appear to have a bigger influence on results for science subjects than for humanities such as media studies, art or music 58 per cent compared with 42 per cent.Study leader Nicholas Shakeshaft said: Children differ in how easily they learn at school. Our rese

7、arch shows that differences in students educational achievement owe more to nature than nurture. Mayor of London Boris Johnson provoked anger last month when he linked success in life to a persons IQHowever, he warned against assuming that educational achievements are genetically predetermined. Inst

8、ead, recognising the predispositions of each child may help improve learning, he said. He said a personalised education that took account of childrens differences would be better than a one size fits all system which ignores genetics.The paper, published in the journal PLOS One, said the findings ma

9、y come as an uncomfortable realisation to those in education.Many teachers and politicians fear that a genetic approach to education may lead to less intelligent children being written off. But Professor Robert Plomin, who co-wrote the paper, said: It means that educational systems which are sensiti

10、ve to childrens individual abilities and needs, which are derived in part from their genetic predispositions, might improve educational achievement. The researchers compared the GCSE results of identical twins who share 100 per cent of their genes with those of non-identical twins, who share only 50

11、 per cent of their DNA.By subtracting the environmental impact, the scientists could disentangle nature from nurture and determine the impact of genes on the school results. Most of the genes that contribute to educational success have yet to be identified, although a 2010 study discovered small var

12、iants linked to mathematical ability.Mr Shakeshaft said: Once we understand more about how the genetic influences work, or once we can identify potential problems early on, well be better able to target specific interventions to help those individuals who might otherwise struggle. Pugh cartoonHoweve

13、r other scientists warned that the study should be treated with caution.Dr Simon Underdown, of Oxford Brookes University, said the research cannot show that intelligence is the product of one or two simple genes. Rather it is managed by an intricate process that relies on genetic factors and environ

14、mental influences. The nature-nurture debate is not over yet, he added. Sarah Norcross, director of the Progress Educational Trust, said the idea of tailoring education based on genetics should be treated with a great degree of scepticism.Mr Johnson was accused of elitism last month when he said som

15、e people would always find it easier to get ahead than others. Whatever you may think of the value of IQ tests, it is surely relevant to a conversation about equality that as many as 16 per cent of our species have an IQ below 85, while about 2 per cent have an IQ above 130, he said.He suggested tha

16、t competition was good because it meant that those with natural ability would be pushed to work harder.Is personality determined by nature or nurture? New research suggests environment is stronger than genes Personality traits are inherited through observed behaviour, not genetics Foster parents have greater influence on personality development than birth paren

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 建筑/环境 > 施工组织

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号