《广州南方人才资源租赁中心招聘派遣农行广东省分行营业部用工上岸历年高频考点试题库答案详解》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《广州南方人才资源租赁中心招聘派遣农行广东省分行营业部用工上岸历年高频考点试题库答案详解（78页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、广州南方人才资源租赁中心招聘派遣农行广东省分行营业部用工上岸历年高频考点试题库答案详解（图片大小可自由调整）第一套一.单项选择题(共50题)1.以下各项中不是金融基础设施的是( )。A.信用评级B.会计与审计体系C.支付清算体系D.金融中介答案：D 本题解析：金融基础设施主要包括:以中央银行为主体的支付清算体系、确保金融市场有效运行的法律程序、会计与审计体系、信用评级、监管框架以及相应的金融标准与交易准则，不包含金融中介，故D项符合题千要求; ABC项均属于金融基础设施的范围，排除。所以答案选D。2.Questions refer to the following advertisement.
2、 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WANTED Goodwill Disability Care Service requires an administrative assistant to work in its central New York office The successful1will enjoy working as part of a dedicated team， with the added satisfaction of working for an organization committed to the care and support of
3、 disabled people The job involves a variety of administrative duties. These will include filing， letter writing， and other secretarial work Training will be provided， if necessary， to equip the jobholder?2computer skills to enable them to use the organizations computer system. This position is3on a
4、fulltime basis only. For further information， please contact us at （315） 3362100.3（）A.availableB.usefulC.informativeD.temporary答案：A 本题解析：此处意为“此职位仅供全职”，表达“有效的；可用的”，因此A项符合文意。available现有的；可买得到的；有空的。useful有用的。informative有内容的；能增进知识的。temporary暂时的。3.A new system（）the latest dataanalysis methods was impleme
5、nted this weekA.is incorporatingB.that incorporatesC.incorporation ofD.had incorporated答案：B 本题解析：句意为：一套包含最新数据分析方法的系统已在本周启用。a new system是主语,主句谓语动词为was,关系代词that引导一个定语从句，先行词在从句中做主语。incorporate意为“包含，并入”，implement“利用，采用”。4.Russian really is hard for lcarners, and a casual comparison might serve the concl
6、usion that big, prestigious languages like Russian are complex. Just look, after all, at their rich, technical vocabularies, and the complex industrial societies that they serve.But linguists who have compared languages systematically are struck by the opposite conclusion.This is largely because lin
7、guists, unlike laypeople, focus on grammar, not vocabulary,Consider Berik, spoken in a few villages in eastern Papua. It may not have a word for“supernova”, but it drips with complex rules: a mandatory verb ending tells what time of day the action occurred, and another indicates the size of the dire
8、et object. Ofcourse these things can be said in English, but Berik requires them. Remote socictics may be materially simplc;“primitive”, their languages are not.Systematically so: a study in 2010 of thousands of tongucs found that smaller languages have more Berik-style grammatical bits and pieces a
9、ttached to words. By contrast, bigger ones tend to be like English or Mandarin, in which words change their form lttle ifat all. No one knows why, but a likely culprit is the very scale and ubiquity of such widely travelled languages.As a language spreads, more foreigners come to learn it as adults
10、(thanks to conquest and trade, for example). Since languages are more complex than they need to be, many of those adult learners will- Stalin-style- ignore some of the niceties where they can. If those newcomers have children, the children will often learn a slightly simpler version of the language
11、from their parents.But a new study, conducted at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics at Nijmegen in the Netherlands, has found that it is not entirely foreigners and their sloppy ways that are to blame for languages becoming simpler. Merely being bigger was enough. The researchers, Limor
12、Raviv, Antje Meyer and Shiri Lev-Ari, asked 12 groups of four strangers and 12 groups of eight to invent languages to describe a group of moving shapes on the screen. They were told that the goal was to rack up points for communicating successfully over 16 rounds. (They“talked by keyboard and were f
13、orbidden to use their native language, Dutch.)Over time both big and small groups got better at making themselves understood,but the bigger ones did so by crcating more systematic languages as they interacted,with fewer idiosyncrasies. The rescarchers suppose that this is because the members of the
14、larger groups had fewer interactions with each other member, this put pressureon them to come up with clear patterns. Smaller groups could afford quirkierlanguages, because their members got to“know”cach other better.Ncither the more systematic nor the more idiosyncratic languages were“better,given
15、group size: the small and large groups communicated equally well. But the work provides evidence that an idiosyncratic language is best suited to a small group with rich shared history, As the language spreads, it nceds to become morepredictablc.Taken with previous studies, the new research offers a two-part answer to why grammar rules are built- and lost. As groups grow, the need for systematic rules becomes greater, unlearnable in-group-speak with random variation wont do. But languages develop more rules than they need; as the
