《考研《英语一》赣州市信丰县2023年全真模拟试题含解析》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《考研《英语一》赣州市信丰县2023年全真模拟试题含解析（11页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、考研英语一赣州市信丰县2023年全真模拟试题Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points) One day, while I was walking to work, I decided to bring some flowers that I had picked from my garden that morning
2、. On the way, I 1 a stranger and presented the bunch to him with a smile card. 2 by the sense of joy, I felt from giving flowers to another person, and may be 3 his day, I wanted to do it again.When I got to my office, I had the 4 of anonymously(匿名) leaving flowers around the workplace. The imperson
3、al(无人情味的) 5 of the building where I work makes me 6 . It just feels a little boring sometimes, 7 its a nice building with great light. I 8 lots of people might feel the same way, so why not put a little 9 there, and throw in an inspirational quote while Im at it? 10 , who doesnt like flowers?So, for
4、 the past month, Ive been putting flowers in a little cup on the sink in the 11 . Each week, I 12 the flowers and the quote. It always feels 13 for me to read quotes like Henry David Thoreaus “If one advances 14 in the direction of his dreams, he will meet with a 15 unexpected in common hours.” and
5、Gandhis “The fragrance(香味) always 16 on the hand that gives the rose.” If anything, I figured, it at least makes me 17 each time I visit the bathroom.Then today, when I walked in, I 18 new flowers in the cup, and a quote that someone else had written！It said, “Be the change you wish to see in the wo
6、rld.”Gandhi.The little act 19 that at the end of the day, were all just people with hearts, 20 the various roles and different hats we may wear in the workplace.I did a little dance and I am smiling wide for the rest of the day!1、Apicked outBcame acrossCcalled upDpointed at2、AStruckBInformedCSurpris
7、edDHonored3、AcalmingBdeterminingCreflectingDbrightening4、AbeliefBwayCideaDaim5、AdesignBatmosphereCdecorationDregulation6、AuncomfortableBimpoliteCimpatientDunconscious7、AwhenBunlessCbecauseDthough8、AconcludedBconsideredCdoubtedDexpected9、AmysteryBadventureCbeautyDcourage10、AMore or lessBAfter allCAt
8、mostDIn no case11、AkitchenBofficeCbathroomDdinning-hall12、AcountBcheckCcleanDchange13、ArefreshingBinterestingCsatisfyingDpuzzling14、AconfidentlyBsurprisinglyCquicklyDeffectively15、AprizeBtruthCsuccessDshock16、AholdsBattachesCremainsDfocuses17、AstrongBhappyCexcitingDshocked18、AnoticedBfoundCenjoyedDp
9、ut19、AintroducesBwarnsCsuggestsDreminds20、Aregardless ofBin terms ofCin addition toDinstead ofSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1 It is
10、generally acknowledged that young people from poorer socio-economic backgrounds tend to do less well in the education system. In an attempt to help the children of poor families, a nationwide program called “Headstart” was started in the US in 1965. A lot of money was poured into it. It took childre
11、n into pre-school institutions at the age of three and was supposed to help them succeed in school. But the results have been disappointing , because the program began too late. Many children who entered it at three were already behind their peers in language and intelligence and the parents were no
12、t involved in the process. At the end of each day, “Headstart” children returned to the same disadvantaged home environment.To improve the results, another program was started in Missouri that concentrated on parents as the child,s first teachers. This program was based on research showing that work
13、ing with the family is the most effective way of helping children get the best possible start in life. The four-year study included 380 families who were about to have their first child and represented different social-economic status, age and family structure. The program involved trained educators
14、 visiting and working with the parent or parents and the child. The program also gave the parents some guidance, and useful skills on child development.At three, the children involved in the “Missouri” program were evaluated with the children selected from the same socio-economic background and fami
15、ly situations. The results were obvious. The children in the program were more advanced in language development, problem solving and other intellectual skills than their peers. They performed equally well regardless of socio-economic backgrounds or family structure. The one factor that was found to affect the child,s development was the poor quality of parent-child interaction. That interaction was not necessarily bad in poorer families.The “Mis
