《论“危险驾驶罪”的主观构成论文》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《论“危险驾驶罪”的主观构成论文（27页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、.27 / 27.内容摘要中华人民XX国刑法修正案将危险驾驶罪收录其中,于对危险驾驶罪的主观构成可谓众说纷纭,莫衷一是。随着司法实践中大量有关危险驾驶罪的案件的发生,与之相对应的新情况、新问题也层出不穷。一方面,这有待立法部门尽快出台新的司法解释来厘清危险驾驶罪的规则边界。另一方面,也需要司法实务工作者与相关学者的积极参与,在理论与实践上为危险驾驶罪的正确适用提供坚实的保障。本文正是在这一背景下,以选取的几件危险驾驶罪的典型案例为出发点,对危险驾驶罪主观构成的认定问题进行分析,为危险驾驶罪的司法实践提出自己的一些看法与建议。本文除引言和结语外共分为三部分：第一部分是对学界关于危险驾驶罪的主观构
2、成的意见的总结,其可归纳为故意说过失说故意过失选择说故意过失并存说及严格责任说这五种观点,并对以上观点的理论依据和实践验证进行综述,从而阐明各自观点的利弊,分析造成以上分歧的原因抽象危险的法律拟制代表的刑法强势介入,原有刑法谦抑性被打破,法益保护的前置性大大缩短了犯罪构成的判断认定时间等等,为接下来的笔者观点的提出做好铺垫。第二部分主要是对危险驾驶罪的主观构成进行理论分析。通过人本主义的价值核心标准的选择,采用人本主义刑法解释范式,将围绕危险驾驶行为所成立的相关犯罪有机的结合在一起,在所形成的危险驾驶行为犯罪圈的系统之下最终提出危险驾驶罪的主观构成故意过失选择说的认定。随后对这种观点进行了详细
3、的论述,既从人的维护这一刑法目的方面进行宏观说明,又从这种观点所能带来的弥补刑法分则体系漏洞,完善危险驾驶行为刑事犯罪圈等作用上进行微观阐释。以刑事打击流程的主线,对危险驾驶罪 交通肇事罪 以危险方法危害公共安全罪 过失以危险方法危害公共安全罪的区别与联系做了全新的注解,从另一方面也突出了危险驾驶罪的主观构成故意过失选择说认定的优势所在。第三部分是对笔者理论的实践检验,通过北京高晓松案XX胡斌案XX孙伟铭案这三个具有代表性的案件进行分析,对危险驾驶行为刑事犯罪圈的构建进1 .行实证说明,从而在实践中检验了危险驾驶罪的主观构成故意过失选择说认定的正确性。关键词：危险驾驶罪；主观构成；故意；过失2
4、.AbstractAmendment to the Criminal Law of the Peoples Republic of China whichincluded dangerous driving In subjective constitute a crime of dangerous driving can bedescribed as divergent views.With the occurrence of judicial practice, the offense ofdangerous driving cases, corresponding to the new s
5、ituation and new problems are endless.Onone hand, this is subject to the legislative branch to the new judicial interpretation as soon aspossible to clarify the boundary of the offense of dangerous driving rules.On the other hand,also requires the active participation of the judicial practitioners a
6、nd scholars, to provide asolid guarantee for the correct application of the dangerous driving in theory andpractice.This article is in this context, to select a few pieces of a typical case of the crime ofdangerous driving as a starting point to analyze the problem of identification of the crime ofd
7、angerous driving subjective constitute judicial practice of the crime of dangerousdrivingsome of the views and suggestions.In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into three parts:The first part is a summary of the views of academic constitute dangerous drivingsubject
8、ive Can be summarized as willful negligence willful misconduct choose to saycoexist said willful misconduct and strict liability five points,And the above point of viewof theoretical basis and practical validation were reviewed to clarify the respective point ofview of the pros and cons of Strong in
9、tervention on behalf of the Criminal Law of the analysiscaused by reason of the above differences - abstract danger legal fiction the originalRestraining Criminal Law was broken, and legal interests protected pre greatly shorten thejudge finds time to constitute the crime for the Next, the author vi
10、ews proposed to pave theway.The second part of the subjective components of the theoretical analysis of the crime ofdangerous driving. Humanism interpretation of criminal law paradigm, the humanisticvalue of the choice of the core standards, will focus on dangerous driving behaviorestablished crime
11、together, in the formation of dangerous driving behavior crime circle thefinal proposed offense of dangerous driving subjective constitute willful misconduct selectidentified under the system. Followed by a detailed exposition of this view, both macroinstructions from maintenance, criminal law purpo
12、ses, make up the criminal law systemvulnerabilities that can be brought about and from this point of view, the perfect dangerous1.driving behavior micro explain the role of the criminal ring, etc. To the criminal tocombat the flow of the main line, traffic crime of dangerous driving dangerous means
13、thecrime of endangering public safety, the differences and relations between the fault of thecrime of endangering public safety by dangerous means new annotations from other alsohighlight the subjective constitute willful misconduct said, identified the advantages ofcrime of dangerous driving.The th
14、ird part is the author theory practice test, Chengdu Sun Weiming case by theBeijing Gao Xiaosong case Hangzhou Hu Bin case analysis of three representative casesof dangerous driving behavior criminal ringempirical description of the subjectivecomponents of the test of a crime of dangerous driving in practice willful m.Keywords:Dangerous driving; Subjective constitute; Deliberately; Negligence2.目录引言. 1一、危险驾驶罪主观构成学说分析. 2一存在学说 . 2二学说分歧的产生原因 . 5二、 危险驾驶罪的主观构成及理论分析. 8一危险驾驶罪的主观构成故意过失选择说 . 8二故意
