《阅读理解考研英语一真题》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《阅读理解考研英语一真题（19页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、阅读理解考研英语一真题语序调整或倒装一种是语法要求必须倒装,比如:以here , there ,then , now , ne_t引出的倒装句;以表地点的介词短语引出的倒装句;以表示方位的副词引出的倒装句;下文是小编为你精心编辑整理的阅读理解考研英语一真题,希望对你有所帮助,更多内容,请点击相关栏目查看,谢谢! 阅读理解考研英语一真题1 Te_t 3 Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain s National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must sta
2、rt by acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It Is against that backgroun
3、d that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her damning verdict against the Royal Free hospital trust under the NHS, which handed over to DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients In _ on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients rights
4、 and their e_pectations of privacy. DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its ways. Further arrangements- and there may be many-between the NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data
5、has been cleaned. There are lessons about informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under e_isting law it controlled the data and DeepMind merely processed it. Bu
6、t this distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation, not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value. The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual
7、from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more. The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance feels slightly maladapted. Th
8、is practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms DeepMind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using public resources. If software promises to save lives on the scale th
9、at dugs now can, big data may be e_pected to behave as a big pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism. Ms Denham s report is a welcome
10、 start. 31.Wha is true of the agreement between the NHS and DeepMind ? A It caused conflicts among tech giants. B It failed to pay due attention to patients rights. C It fell short of the latter s e_pectations D It put both sides into a dangerous situation. 32. The NHS trust responded to Denham s ve
11、rdict with A empty promises. B tough resistance. C necessary adjustments. D sincere apologies. 33.The author argues in Paragraph 2 that A privacy protection must be secured at all costs. B leaking patients data is worse than selling it. C making profits from patients data is illegal. D the value of
12、data comes from the processing of it 34.According to the last paragraph, the real worry arising from this deal is A the vicious rivalry among big pharmas. B the ineffective enforcement of privacy law. C the uncontrolled use of new software. D the monopoly of big data by tech giants. 35.The author s
13、attitude toward the application of AI to healthcare is A ambiguous. B cautious. C appreciative. D contemptuous. 阅读理解考研英语一真题2 Te_t 3 The journal Science is adding an e_tra source at Peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNott announced today. The Follows similar efforts from other journals, af
14、ter widespread concern that Mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the Published research findings. Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal, writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the Journal has appointed seven e_per
15、ts to a statistics board of reviewing Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the Journal s editors, or by its e_isting Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer The SBoRE panel will then find e_ternal statisticians to review these Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said, The creation of the statistics boar
