《用语言学的方法分析短消息语言和行为_1》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《用语言学的方法分析短消息语言和行为_1（21页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、从本学科出发，应着重选对国民经济具有一定实用价值和理论意义的课题。课题具有先进性，便于研究生提出新见解，特别是博士生必须有创新性的成果用语言学的方法分析短消息语言和行为 Abstract：This paper begins with an introduction to mobile-based short massage, or SM for short. Although the arrival of SM brings convenience and happiness to peoples life, the characteristics of SM language result
2、in its vulnerability to misunderstanding. From a linguistic perspective, factors responsible for the misunderstanding of SM are analyzed. Firstly, SM language violates the co-operative principle. People adopt a cooperative principle when they communicate with each other: they try to get along with e
3、ach other by following certain conversational “maxims”. The violation of these maxims makes the functions of SM indefinite and SM users have to interpret SM based on thEir own experience. Secondly, in contrast with face-to-face conversations and telephone calls, SM lacks body language, facial expres
4、sions, proper stress and intonation. Thirdly, SM language is more casual than written language. In conclusion, this paper suggests some solutions to the related problem. Key words: short massage or SM, misunderstanding, cooperative principle, body language, facial expression, intonation, stress, wri
5、tten language 摘要：本文的开头对移动电话的短消息作了简要的介绍。尽管短消息的出现给人们带来了方便，短消息自身语言的特点导致了它容易被人们误解。从语言学的角度，本文 分析 了导致短信被误解的几个因素。第一，短消息语言违背了合作原则。人们在交际过程中，常常会采用一种准则。为了很好的交流，人们回遵守“会话准则”。而短信语言对准则的违背，导致了短信的作用不明确。并且，人们在解释短信 内容 时，往往只根据自己的经验。第二，与面对面的谈话和电话通讯相比，短信缺少肢体语言、表情、适当的重音和语调。第三，短信语言与书面语言相比，具有随意性。文章的结尾对相关的 问题 提出了解决的办法。 关键词：短
6、消息或短信、误解、合作原则、肢体语言、表情、重音、语调、书面语言 An Analysis of Short Message Language and Behaviors with a Linguistic Approach Thesis statement: Short message is vulnerable to misunderstanding, which can be explained by the violation of the cooperative principle, and in contrast with traditional conversation and w
7、ritten language, the deficiency of short message is analyzed. Outline I Introduction II The vulnerability of SM to misunderstanding from the perspective of the cooperative principleA. Introduction of cooperative and the violation of maximsB. Three kinds of misunderstanding The indefinite nature of t
8、he senders message A number of factors affecting the interpretation of SM The query concerning the end of SM conversation III The deficiency of SM in contrast with face-to-face conversation and TEL call A. The lack of body language and expression B. The lack of stress and intonation IV The casualnes
9、s of SM in contrast with written language A. SM processed at random B. The differences between SM language and written language V Conclusion I Introduction Short Message Service (SMS) is a new communicational tool that combines the functions of mobile phone and pager. According to the statistics fro
10、m Global GPS Association, the total number of SMs has reached10 billion in003, and China accounts for one third of them, soaring to 170 billion. SM is regarded as a convenient, highly democratic, informational medium for conveying messages that conforms well to human needs. As a modern communication
11、 tool, SM has many advantages which are absent in other communication medias. For example, SM enables dumb people to communicate freely with healthy people; SM makes no noise which may bother others; SM protects privacy, because no third party knows the content of SM conversation. However , the char
12、acteristics of SM language also bring negative effects to peoples life. People find that SM is not so powerful and pleasant, and it can be easily misunderstood. With the help of linguistic approaches, factors that are responsible for the misunderstanding of SM are analyzed: 1). the violation of the
13、cooperative principle.) SM can not take the place of face-to-face conversation.) SM is more casual than written language. II The vulnerability of SM to misunderstanding from the perspective of the cooperative principleThe process of sending SM is so easy and informal that people treat it as they do
14、conversation. SM is a bit like a conversation at the water cooler that can be instantly forwarded to0 people. For a conversation to be successful, in most social contexts, the participants need to feel they are contributing something to it and are getting something out of it. For this to happen, cer
15、tain conditions must apply. Everyone must have an opportunity to speak: no one should be monopolizing or constantly interrupting. The participants need to make thEIr roles clear; they need to have a sense of when to speak or stay silent; when to proffer information or hold it back; when to stay aloo
16、f or become involved.The success of a conversation depends not only on what speakers say but on their whole approach to the interaction. “Our talk exchanges do not normally consist of a succession of disconnected remarks, and would not be rational if they did. They are characteristically, to some degree at least, cooperative efforts; and each participant recognizes in the
