《欧盟关于可追溯性traceability方面的讲座ppt04_pp_jrc_flt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《欧盟关于可追溯性traceability方面的讲座ppt04_pp_jrc_flt（30页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、Farm Level Traceability (FLT): a step ahead in CAP reform implementation,Paolo PIZZIOL (paolo.pizzioljrc.it),PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 2 / 17,Definitions,Traceability is the ability to trace the history, application or location of that which is under consideration (ISO 9001: 2000) Farm
2、 Level traceability is a concept which encompasses a wide range record keeping in farm management, starting from detailed geo-referencing of all individual parcels comprising the farm, to the dynamic correlation among parcels with a view of fine-tuning the farming system and achieving a more sustain
3、able and profitable farming.,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 3 / 17,EU Legal basis (for traceability),-Traceability systems for Labelling/Certification were already in place PGI, PDO Plant Health Regime (plant passport system-since 1993) Animal Health Regime (since 1993),-After the BSE crisi
4、s, Traceability became a mustRegulation (EC) 1760/2000,-General Food Law (GFL): Traceability for all food and feedRegulation (EC) 178/2002,-GMO Food and Feed Traceability and Labelling:Regulation (EC) 1830/2003,-GFL is among the SMR of cross compliance (CAP reform) Council Regulation (EC) 1782/2003,
5、Inside GFL, Minimum requirements are actually: keep record of one-step ahead /one step back partners and products label products to facilitate its traceability,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 4 / 17,Traceability: why?,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 5 / 17,Other definitions,Geo-trace
6、ability : associates geographical coordinates to relevant information for production traceability Tracing: determining the history of a food throughout the food chain Upward: from farm to fork Downward: from fork to farm Tracking: determining the location of a certain food in the food chain in a cer
7、tain moment track back: one step down track forward: one step up Record keeping is collecting all relevant data and information,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 6 / 17,Traceability: dedicated technologies,Traceability systems could range within different levels of complexity: Paper records Di
8、gital records DB, on-line DB, ad hoc SW solutions, GIS, remote sensing, GPS, GPRS, barcode scanners Automatic recording (RFID, bar code etc., wireless connections) to minimise burden and to require (target) from farmers only validationAnyway, a baseline information is needed (farm-diagnosis) to asse
9、ss what is appropriate for the specific business,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 7 / 17,Traceability: available technologies and questioning,Traceability is actually a reality for many food producers e.g. EurepGAP Sectorial schemes (eggs, meat etc.) etc., Is there a problem of traceability s
10、ystems compatibility? Could a Unique spatial ID help in the integration of different databases? Could LPIS be a basis for an effective traceability system? Of course, YES! Because LPIS provide updated information on the parcel (location- geo-referenced and surroundings-, size, shape, crop use, histo
11、ry) Are there technologies facilitating record collection by minimising the active data entry on farmers side?,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 8 / 17,Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer, and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position o
12、f the European Commission.1. Overview of the current situation2. What we envisage,FLT(+ LPIS) and FAS: a step ahead in the CAP reform,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 9 / 17,Conclusions (1),FLT consists basically of data acquisition, storage and analysis but FLT, as structured and consistent
13、source of information, based on LPIS, could be an asset to add value and help farm diagnosis and improve farming systems ergo support CAP implementation FLT implementation requires know-how, competence, training, resources (Legal) FLT minimum requirements could be extended FAS could benefit from the
14、 information granted by FLT. Integration of FLT data into FAS is desirable,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 10 / 17,Conclusions (2),Risks of not implementing FLT(+ LPIS) Too much administration (application, contracts etc.) Extra cost for producers (especially if not IT literate) Liability of
15、 operator in case of problemsBenefits Facilitated application procedure Saving useful information usually lost in the supply chain Simplified management if information is collected properly If the information collected is in the frame of a traceability systems (record keeping), this could provide an
16、 automatic certification for Cross-compliance,PETER Workshop, YORK 11-13 October 2006 11 / 17,Conclusions (3),Which role could play JRC? Stimulate discussion Perform and/or coordinate research/studies Lead networking of MS administrations/private companies Define/promote best practices Provide guidelines drafting,We think that the challenge at this stage is to convince policy makers and farmers of the added value of an adequately implemented traceability and therefore perform studies demonstrating this.,
