列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义

上传人:宝路 文档编号:52506371 上传时间:2018-08-22 格式:PPT 页数:7 大小:534.32KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《列举两个案例分析贸易保护主义(7页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、International Economy,Protectionism,By:,case,The United States steel import restrictions of “201“ clause in March 2002, 20, was set up. Steel protection ultimately relief programmes of the United States “ section 201 “ provisions on imports such as steel, long the main iron and steel, the implementa

2、tion of a 3 - year tariff quota or tariff that added up to 8-30. This is by far the United States on imported steel imposed by the most serious in the history of trade restrictions.,Identify why the government uses this protectionism,Section 201 of the United States is the subject of “ damaged by im

3、ports of the positive adjustment of the industry “. This provision authorizes the President but excessive foreign countries fair competition, by foreign imports of the same industry and cause damage to the industry through the appropriate relief measures to prevent or remedy the damage and to facili

4、tate domestic industry the necessary adjustments.,Flaws,Referred to in paragraph 201 of the US Congress “ damage “ and “ threat “ does not give a definition, just providing some parameters, such as serious idle industrial facilities, and each Member of the Committee are free to determine in each cas

5、e the definition. Is a kind of trade protection measures.,consequence,The United States is the worlds largest steel consumer, the move to Americas largest steel suppliers the European Union, the economic losses caused by may have billions of dollars. South Korea, Japan, Brazil and other countries wi

6、ll also suffer damage as a result. In retaliation for the United States to raise import tariffs on steel, in June, the EU imposed on some U.S. goods 100 percent tariff, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, have also increased tariffs or take emergency safeguard measures. Although the WTO ruled that the Unite

7、d States violates WTO rules eventually, but for both the steel trade war brought huge losses, it is estimated that in 2002 alone, the EU would lose up to $ 240 million. In the past the United States to bear the loss of several hundred million dollars, while also resulted in 74,000 unemployed steel c

8、onsumers, more harm than good.,Explain what inspiration you get from this case?,Trade protectionism ostensibly to protect the country from competitive harm or threat actually impeded the development of the industry. From a long-term point of view, not only had a more or less on their economic losses, are dampening the countrys industrial upgrading.,The end Thanks !,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 大学课件

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号