《challengesforpppsineducation》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《challengesforpppsineducation（12页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、Challenges for PPPs in EducationDr. Miguel Szkely, Director, Instituto de Innovacin Educativa, ITESM, prepared for World Bank Conference on “Leveraging the Private Sector for Results in Education”, Washington DC, 31 March, 2010Questions1. What can the World Bank Group learn about the ways private do
2、nors operate in education globally?2. How can the World Bank Group support client countries make better use of strategic partnerships?3. How can the World Bank Group facilitate the entry of private donors in client countries for their work in education?Conclusions: Role for WB in1. Coordination to m
3、ake supply and demand (for support) meet. 2. From individual actions to a framework that allows using funds efficiently and strategically3. Influence design and “packaging” of private initiatives (WB endorsement)4. Generate information on what works (evaluation design and financing)How partners see
4、each other?.Problem # 1: different views depending from which side you are onNON GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENTIncapacity to provide evidence on the impact of aid (transparency)Lack of institutional capacity to operate programs; rigidities, bureaucracy, Short term view due to political cycles, when education
5、 is a long term ventureGovernment doesnt know what it wants, so it shouldnt tell us what to doLack of innovation capacity in the GovernmentFear of “crowding out” public investmentNON GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT Supply driven support (every body wants to “sell their product”, move their own agenda on); lea
6、ds to duplication, under investment, etc.Unilateral initiatives create problems in schools (e.g. computers to children with teachers with no skills)Small , disperse, and fragmented contributions for a huge problemDonors not willing to share credit with others (fragmentation of resources)Individual a
7、ctions do not necessarily add up to a good strategyProblem # 1: different views depending from which side you are onPrivate sector wants to take over (privatization)RISK (information transparency, accountability)Problem # 2: different objectives, different views, different prioritiesNON GOVERNMENT G
8、OVERNMENTCorporate Foundations: . Market expansionPolitical returns Specific short term prioritiesNGOs - Philanthropic: . Specific populations. Specific issuesOther Private (Religious, etc): . Specific issues . Specific prioritiesA way for organizing the analysisDelivery of education services1. Phys
9、ical spaceINPUTS2. Infrastructure3. Equipment4. Contents (curriculum)5. Materials, text books6. ITC7. Services (operation)8. Support demand by students (scholarships)9. Teacher training10. Training of Principals11. School management12. Extra curricular (sports, arts, etc.)13. Family, student support
10、14. School context15. Public policy (standards, norms, etc.)FUNDINGPublic Non PublicCash In KindUnconditional Incentives Conditional Provision Operation Know-howUniversal / Targeted to specific groups or needsINFORMATIONEvaluation Transparency AccountabilityMiddle Education in Mexico1. Physical spac
11、eINPUTS2. Infrastructure3. Equipment4. Contents (curriculum)5. Materials, text books6. ITC7. Services (operation)8. Support demand by students (scholarships)9. Teacher training10. Training of Principals11. School management12. Extra curricular (sports, arts, etc.)13. Family, student support14. Schoo
12、l context15. Public policy (standards, norms, etc.)FUNDINGPublic Non PublicCash In KindUnconditional Incentives Conditional Provision Operation Know-howUniversal / Targeted to specific groups or needsINFORMATIONEvaluation Transparency AccountabilityVarious localMicrosoft CISCOTELMEXMicrosoft CISCOIN
13、TELTELMEXBecalosNGOsMexicanos PrimeroChallenge: identify strategy in a context where Political gains vs real needs Corporate interests vs real needsInterest in specific Groups vs real needsGood will vs policy prioritiesConclusions: Role for WB in1. Coordination to make supply and demand (for support) meet. 2. From individual actions to a framework that allows using funds efficiently and strategically3. Influence design and “packaging” of private initiatives (WB endorsement)4. Generate information on what works (evaluation design and financing)
