《遥感院博士生讲座(单杰教授5.21)_short._for_students》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《遥感院博士生讲座(单杰教授5.21)_short._for_students（34页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、1The Journey to a Journal 博士研究生讲座 单杰遥感信息工程学院 2011.05.21中华人民共和国学位条例 （1980年2月12日第五届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议通过 根据2004年8月28日第十届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十一次会议 关于修改中华人民共和国学位条例的决定修正）第六条 高等学校和科学研究机构的研究生， 或具有研究生毕业同等学力的人员，通过博士 学位的课程考试和论文答辩，成绩合格，达到 下述学术水平者，授予博士学位：（一）在本门学科上掌握坚实宽广的基础理 论和系统深入的专门知识；（二）具有独立从事科学研究工作的能力；（三）在科学或专门技术上
2、做出创造性的成 果。2我院对博士毕业学术论文的要求1、发表学术论文的基本要求(需满足下列条件之一)(1) 在国际主要学术期刊或国内一级学会的一级学报(如 测绘学报、遥感学报、地理学报、电子学报、计算机学 报等)上发表1篇与博士学位论文相关的学术论文。 (2) 在“985工程”或“211工程”大学的学报上发表2篇内容 不重复、并与博士学位论文相关的学术论文，其中至少 有1篇在申请答辩时已被刊出。2、对不能正式刊出的学术论文，须出具正式录用函和相 关证明材料。3我院对博士毕业学术论文的要求 （续） 3、必须以第一作者发表；如果指导教师是第 一作者，博士生是第二作者，亦视为该生为第 一作者。作者单位
3、应署为“武汉大学遥感信息 工程学院”。 4、鼓励博士生参加各类学术会议，从事学术 交流活动。 5、本规定自2013年起施行，解释权归学院学 位评定分委员会。45Outline How to write a journal paper ? How to work with editors and reviewers ?How to write a journal paper ? Components of a paper What makes a paper accepted ? Common problems Some useful tips Summary67Components of a
4、paperAbstract (300 words) Problem Approach Objective Main findings Introduction Clear problem description Significance of the problem Current solutions and their limitation (for methodology paper) Your solution Structure of the paper Theory framework Sub item 1, 2, n Discuss. or summary, if neededTe
5、st design Study area Test data, equipment, Results and evaluation Be logic, in detail Be objective, articulate Conclusion Your findings Implication Contribution Future work Reference Acknowledgement Appendix 8What makes a paper accepted ? 4C: correct; clear; consistent; concise; + clean Must have a
6、well-defined objective Must be self-contained Must be understandable Must be informative Must have new understandings9Common problems - 1 Messed structure One thing in n sections, paragraphs, sentences Things or elements are not connected Things are cross-linked 10Common problems - 2 Lack of details
7、 Incomplete data description, missing info Loose end statement （半句话）etc Missing implementation description, parameter values11Common problems 3 Lack of clarity Fuzzy use of it, these, those, which, that Miss necessary graphs, tables, formulas12Common problems 4 Lack of logic Insufficient test design
8、 Unable to convincingly explain your results Self-contradictory (even explicitly)13Common problems 5 Lack of “your” understanding Simply read the tables/results Not interpret the results Not explore the mechanism WHY it is this way !14Common problems 6 Self-appreciated Biased or fraud test design (d
9、ata, terrain, etc) Non-typical or non-sufficient cases Subjective discussion Biased evaluation15Some tips before writing Reading is a habit Read always Read with critique Read and understand the details And read to get the ideaWriting is a habit Writing is a skill Writing is about logic Write daily
10、as your journal Have a proper target journal in mind Have some sample papers in hands, use them as template Familiarize yourself with style, requirement etc Try to tell your work to some one as a story16Some tips during writing Have a clear, well-defined objective List the questions to answer Write
11、the body first Write the introduction, abstract last Write clearly, logically, and smoothly Make connection in every two “units” Write consistently (notation, variables etc) Write it concisely Use common vocabulary, have sentence variety Avoid complex sentences Use active voice to impress audience P
12、unch your writing, and punch it again.17Some tips - after writing Take a break ( 1-2 week), read it again as a reviewer / reader with critique Punch it, and check The argument logical ? The findings sound ? The discussion convincing ? Have some one read it Read it again, have it polished Formatting,
13、 styling, submitting18Summary Reading/writing is I/O, should be coupled Paper is a linear work, not a net-work Paper is a balanced work, not a Delta function Details warrant the acceptance Do not assume reviewers know all or nothing Paper must be articulate Paper must use written language It is a PR
14、OCESS of learning and practicing Persistence pays How to Work with Editors and Reviewers ?1920It is a process21Checklist before on the way2222Checklist at submission Make sure you have good materials Number your pages be professional Adding courtesy authors not helpful Simple cover letter a couple o
15、f lines Key words be specific Whitelist of reviewers neutral; realistic; active Blacklist of reviewers When necessary; conflict of interest Take a look after your uploading2323Itinerary of your submissionWeek 0 e-submission to Editor-in-Chief; e-receipt Week 1 EIC assigns it to an (Associate) Editor Week 2 AE/Editor selects mostly unpaid Batch job once a week on editorial assignments a couple of weeks delay be expected Reviewers Very busy people too; mostly volunteers Review is on weekend or on roads A couple of weeks to months delay be expected
