《几种多指标评价法方的比较研究》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《几种多指标评价法方的比较研究（34页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、几种多指标评价方法的比较研究中国地质大学（北京）工商管理教研室高孝伟 中国地质大学（北京） Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Evaluation only.Evaluati
2、on only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.几种多指标评价方法的比较研究中国地质大学（北京）工商管理教研室几种多指标评价方法的比较研究主 要 内 容4. 结论1.绪论2. 常用评价方法实证分析3. 评价方法的比较与建议Evaluat
3、ion only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Clie
4、nt Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.几种多指标评价方法的比较研究中国地质大学（北京）工商管理教研室1.1 选题目的与意义1.2 多指标综合评价的特点指标选择方向不同指标计量单位不同指标权重系数不同结果与评价者有关不涉及到不确定性1.绪论Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with A
5、spose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.S
6、lides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.几种多指标评价方法的比较研究中国地质大学（北京）工商管理教研室2. 常用评价方法实证分 析表1 六种设备的主要评价指标指标标 方案成本功耗转转速可靠性A18.0650020000A27.0740015000A36.5820015000A45.0530010000A54.0820010000 A63.51010060002.1 加权效用综合评价法 假设某企业生产时有六种设备
7、选择方案，采用的评 价指标有成本、功耗、转速和可靠性，基础资料见 表1，问应作何种设备选择决策？Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Evaluation only.Evalua
8、tion only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.几种多指标评价方法的比较研究中国地质大学（北京）工商管理教研室2. 常用评价方法实证分 析2.1 加权效用综合评价法指标标 方案成本功耗转转速可靠性A10.11.01.0 A2 A3
9、A41.0 A5 A61.00.10.10.1指标标 方案成本功耗转转速可靠性A10.11.01.0 A20.3 A30.4 A40.71.0 A50.9 A61.00.10.10.1指标标 方案成本功耗转转速可靠性A10.10.821.01.0 A20.30.64 A30.40.46 A40.71.0 A50.90.46 A61.00.10.10.1指标标 方案成本功耗转转速可靠性A10.10.821.01.0 A20.30.640.92 A30.40.460.54 A40.71.00.78 A50.90.460.54 A61.00.10.10.1指标标 方案成本功耗转转速可靠性A10.10
10、.821.01.0 A20.30.640.920.68 A30.40.460.540.68 A40.71.00.780.36 A50.90.460.540.36 A61.00.10.10.1指标标 方案成本 0.32功耗 0.25转转速 0.18可靠性 0.25 A10.10.821.01.0 A20.30.640.920.68 A30.40.460.540.68 A40.71.00.780.36 A50.90.460.540.36 A61.00.10.10.1指标标 方案成本 0.32功耗 0.25转转速 0.18可靠性 0.25综综合评评 价值值 A10.10.821.01.00.6670
11、 A20.30.640.920.680.5916 A30.40.460.540.680.5102 A40.71.00.780.360.7044 A50.90.460.540.360.5902 A61.00.10.10.10.3880多比例评分 法backEvaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 200
12、4-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.几种多指标评价方法的比较研
13、究中国地质大学（北京）工商管理教研室2. 常用评价方法实证分 析2.2 AHP 层次分析法通过一致性检验Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Evaluation only.Ev
14、aluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd.几种多指标评价方法的比较研究中国地质大学（北京）工商管理教研室2. 常用评价方法实证分 析2.2 AHP 层次分析法表7 方案相对于准则的重要性、综合评价值及排序准则方案成本
15、万元功耗 千瓦转速 转/分可靠性 无故障时数综合评价值 排序 0.51930.20090.07890.2009 A10.1079990.1939060.2941180.2631580.1711144 A20.1234270.1662050.2352940.1973680.1557025 A30.1329220.1454290.1176470.1973680.1471776 A40.1727980.2326870.1764710.1315790.1768392 A50.2159980.1454290.1176470.1315790.1771011 A60.2468550.1163430.0588
16、240.0789470.1720673准则方案成本 万元功耗 千瓦转速 转/分可靠性 无故障时数综合评价值 排序 0.51930.20090.07890.2009 A10.1079990.1939060.2941180.2631580.1711144 A20.1234270.1662050.2352940.1973680.1557025 A30.1329220.1454290.1176470.1973680.1471776 A40.1727980.2326870.1764710.1315790.1768392 A50.2159980.1454290.1176470.1315790.1771011 A60.2468550.1163430.0588240.0789470.1720673Evaluation only.Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0.Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Pr
