《新GRE Issue写作范文详情透析9-智课教育旗下智课教育》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《新GRE Issue写作范文详情透析9-智课教育旗下智课教育（7页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料新GREIssue写作范文详情透析9-智课教育旗下智课教育新GRE作文分两大块，一部分是Argument,一部分是Issue,那么Iss ue写作又该如何去写呢？怎样写好呢？以下是新GRE Issue写作范文详情透析，希望能给广大GRE考生一些参考。 考生在迎战GRE考试的时候，会搜索大量的资料去背记GRE作文， 那么怎样去更好的迎战呢?请看智课教育考试规划师怎样为广大GRE考 生解析的GREIssue作文。 Issue “In many countries it is now possible to turn on the television and
2、view government at work. Watching these proceedings can help people understand the issues that affect their lives. The more kinds of government proceedings - trials, debates, meetings, etc. - that are televised, the more society will benefit.“ Sample EssayAnything that makes a countrys government mo
3、re transparent is certainly a good thing, at least in democratic countries. These societies have a great deal to gain by being able to watch their elected government officials in action. But to broadly state that the more government proceedings that are televised, the more society will benefit is to
4、 ignore the fact that sometimes, less is more. Some types of proceedings can even be adversely affected if televised, making society worse off rather than giving it a benefit. Some types of governmental proceedings should receive more televised coverage, but there are some that should probably recei
5、ve less to ensure that they are properly conducted. One example of the possible negative effects of televising all governmental proceedings was the trial in the United States of accused murderer and former National Football League superstar O.J. Simpson. The trial was televised and became a huge med
6、iaspectacle, captivating the nations attention during the entire trial. Attorneys were well aware that the proceedings were being televised and almost behaved as if they were acting in a movie. The spotlight was so unrelenting that the circus atmosphere affected even the judge. The presence of telev
7、ision cameras and the effect of the intense media coverage led to a trial like no other, and adversely affected the natural progression of the trial. The participants played to the cameras rather than focusing on the task at hand. Largely because of television, many people would argue that justice w
8、as not served during this particular trial. On the other hand, television of the day-to-day workings of government in action provides direct insight into how a government actually works. Because the television cameras are there everyday, the governmental officials become accustomed to them and are n
9、o longer greatly affected by their presence. In this way, society benefits because they are able to see what is happening as it happens. The government in action is no longer hidden behind such a veil of secrecy so that no one knows the mysterious ways of their elected officials.One of the problems
10、with stating that the more governmental proceedings that are televised, the better of a society is, is that people might come to believe that they are seeing everything when in fact, a television camera can only see part of what is happening no matter how many cameras there are. Much of what happens
11、 in government takes place “behind the scenes“, not necessarily in full view of the cameras in the meeting place. While to an extent “seeing is believing“, quite often it is what you dont see that makes the difference. Merely televising governmental proceedings certainly enhances understanding, but
12、to fully understand the process a person would actually have to actively participate in that process.Another problem with the statement that the more televised governmental proceedings, the better, is that it assumes that people actually watch the proceedings when they are broadcast. There is a tele
13、vision channel in the United States that broadcasts Congressional proceedings every day, but few people watch it. Only when some big issue comes up for a debate or for a vote does a significant number of people tune in. To merely televise governmental proceedings will not affect society unless socie
14、ty watches these events. Society can certainly benefit from the television coverage of certain governmental proceedings. To actually see the elected officials in action can bring an extra element of understanding into the inner workings of a government. Politicians can be held accountable for their
15、actions while they are being “watched“ by the television cameras. No longer can they hide in anonymity while they are conducting the business of the people. But not all governmental proceedings should be televised. There are times when secrecy is an absolute requirement for making sure that the corr
16、ect decisions are made. 观点陈述型作文/题目“在许多国家，人们现在可以打开电视，便可以看到政府是如何运 作的。观看到这样一些程序能够帮助人们理解那些影响到其生活的问题 。电视转播政府程序审判，辩论，会议等不一而足的种类越多 ，则社会将会获益更多。” 范文正文 任何能使一个国家的政府更透明的事情无疑总是一件好事情，至少 在民主国家中是如此。这些社会通过得以看到他们所选举的政府官员在 做些什么而获益匪浅。但是，如果只是笼统地说政府程序转播得越多， 社会就会获益更多，那么，这便忽视了这样一个事实，即有些时候，转 播得越少越好。有些类型的程序如果进行转播，则甚至会受到负面影响 ，使社会处于更糟糕的境地，而不是带来任何裨益。有些类型的政府程 序应获得更多的电视报道，但有些应该减少报道，以确保这些程序能恰当地进行。 转播所有政府程序会引发负面作用，这方面的例子是美国对所指控 的谋杀者和前美式足球全国联赛超级明星O.J.辛普逊的审判。审判全程 转播，成为媒体一大焦点，在整个审判进程中吸引了全国的注意力。律 师们清楚地知道，整个审判程序被转播，他们的所作所
