《20世纪30年代中国本位文化论战之考察》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《20世纪30年代中国本位文化论战之考察（87页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、分类号：_ 密 级：_ ：_ 单位代码：_ 硕士学位论文硕士学位论文 论文题目：20 世纪 30 年代中国本位文化论战之考察 学 号：_ 姓 名：_ 专 业 名 称：_ 学 院：_ 指 导 教 师：_ 论文提交日期：2014 年 4 月 14 日 胡伶俐 公开 1 1 6 4 6 1111061018 K203 中国近现代史 人文与传媒学院 贾庆军 副教授 A Thesis Submitted to Ningbo University for the Masters Degree The Investigation of China-centered Cultural Debate in 19
2、30s Candidate： Hu Lingli Supervisors：Associated Professor Jia Qingjun Faculty of Liberal Art and Communication Ningbo University Ningbo 315211， Zhejiang P.R.CHINA Date: April, 14, 2014独独 创创 性性 声声 明明 本人郑重声明：所呈交的论文是我个人在导师指导下进行的研究工作及取得研究成果。尽我所知，除了文中特别加以标注和致谢的地方外，论文中不包含其他人已经发表或撰写的研究成果，也不包含为获得宁波大学或其他教育机构
3、的学位或证书所使用过的材料。与我一同工作的同志对本研究所做的任何贡献均已在论文中做了明确的说明并表示了谢意。 若有不实之处，本人愿意承担相关法律责任。 签名：_ 日期：_ 关于论文使用授权的声明关于论文使用授权的声明 本人完全了解宁波大学有关保留、使用学位论文的规定，即：学校有权保留送交论文的复印件，允许论文被查阅和借阅；学校可以公布论文的全部或部分内容，可以采用影印、缩印或其他复制手段保存论文。 （保密的论文在解密后应遵循此规定）（保密的论文在解密后应遵循此规定） 签名：_ 导师签名：_ 日期：_ 宁波大学硕士学位论文 I 20 世纪 30 年代中国本位文化论战之考察 摘摘 要要 20 世纪
4、 30 年代的中国本位文化论战，发生于官方主导的文化环境下，发生于国难深重的局势下，发生于西方文化内部出现危机的情形下，由此导致知识分子在文化建设运思上表现出不同，从而形成了不同的文化论战之走向。虽然此次论战表现出不同的文化论战之走向，但实质都是为了解决如何吸收西方文化这一核心问题，由此达到重建中国本位文化的目的。 受时代环境的影响，知识分子在文化建设运思上主要表现出以下特征：依附于官方主导的意识形态阐述自己的文化建设主张；以民族作为文化建设承载的主体，将文化建设运动与民族复兴运动相合流，在民族主义视域下寻求文化建设的出路；中国本位文化建设不仅应着眼于西方文化的吸收，还应该对传统文化加以一番的
5、检讨和审视。透过这些特征可以获悉：此次论战所提出的中国本位为什么会与复古、专制、独裁联系在一起；民族主义视域下进行文化重建是一件复杂的工作，中国本位文化派和全盘西化派的论争，实质是民族主体如何坚守问题的论争，这两者虽然在文化建设路向上不同，但最终所欲达到的目的都是寻求中华民族的出路；传统文化对中国本位文化建设具有重要的价值和意义，这一定程度上肯定了传统文化的地位。 同时，纵观各论者的文化建设主张可以明晰，在输入西方文化问题上已达成共识，而在如何吸收西方文化问题上，大家发生了相互间的论争。论争围绕全盘西化论和中国本位文化论而展开，揭示出西方文化论和中国本位文化论的不足，提出了各种文化建设理论和思
6、维理路，但结果是未能形成文化建设的共识。这种结果的产生，源自于中国本位文化论的抽象性，中国国情的复杂性和西方文化内部的分裂性。这说明处于此时代的知识分子，文化建设上已陷入无法走出的困境。但必须指出的是知识分子所提出的文化建设路径却值得后来的文化建设者所借鉴。 关键词：中国本位文化论， 文化论战走向， 全盘西化论， 中国本位文化建设 20 世纪30 年代中国本位文化论战之考察 II The Investigation of China-centered Cultural Debate in 1930s Abstract The China-centered cultural debate in
7、the 1930s, which occurred under the government-led cultural environment, occurred at grave national crisis situation, occurred in the case of an internal crisis of Western culture. This led to the thinking ways of the intellectuals in the cultural construction exhibit different, thus the China-cente
8、red cultural debate formed different cultural debate trends. Though the debate showed different cultural debate trends, the essence of the cultural debate is the core issue of how to resolve the absorption of Western culture, so as to achieve the purposes of reconstructing China-centered culture. Af
9、fected the environment of times, the intellectuals in the thinking of cultural construction mainly exhibited the following characteristics: they explained their ideas of the cultural construction attaching to the official ideology; they hosted the nation as the body of the cultural construction, and
10、 merged the cultural construction movement with the national revival movement ,so as to seek a outlet of cultural reconstruction under the ethnic sight; they also think, the China-centered cultural construction not only should focus on the absorption of Western culture, but also should review and ex
11、amine the traditional culture. Through these features can be learned: why the culture debate putting forward China-centered culture associated with the retro, tyranny, dictatorship together; the cultural reconstruction is a complex task under the sight of nationalism,. The argumentation between the
12、China-centered cultural school and wholesale westernization school is how to stick to the national body in essence. Although the two different cultural construction trends were different, they both desired to achieve ultimate goal is to seek the outlet of the Chinese nation; traditional culture play
13、ed the important role on the China-centered cultural construction, which affirmed the status and value of traditional culture in the certain extent. Meanwhile, throughout the idea of each intellectual of the cultural construction, we can clearly know that they had reached a consensus on the issue of
14、 Western culture entered, but they mainly debated each other on how to absorb the western culture. The debate expanded around. the wholesale westernization theory and China-centered cultural theory, revealing the deficiency of the wholesale westernization theory and China-centered cultural theory, p
15、utting forward various theories and thinking ways of the cultural construction. But the ultimate result of the cultural debate was unable to reach consensus. This outcome derived from the abstract of China-centered cultural 宁波大学硕士学位论文 III theory, the complexity of Chinese national condition and the internal division of Western culture. This shows that the intellectuals in this period on the cultural construction had been unable to get out of trouble. But it must be noted that the path o
