《股权激励契约特征与企业创新》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《股权激励契约特征与企业创新（20页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、股权激励契约特征与企业创新 李丹蒙 万华林 华东理工大学商学院 上海立信会计金融学院 摘 要： 大量的经济学与管理学文献研究表明, 以企业为主体的创新是经济增长的关键驱动力。而企业管理层是创新活动的主要决策者, 其激励对于公司的创新活动至关重要。本文尝试探讨股权激励方案的实施以及不同激励方案的契约特征对企业创新活动的影响。基于中国上市公司 20072014 年度的数据, 本文采用双重差分 (DID) 的研究思路, 实证检验了我国上市公司股权激励方案的实施对公司创新活动的影响。本文研究发现, 与对照样本相比, 在股权激励方案实施后, 样本公司研发投入和专利授予量均显著增加。本文研究还发现, 上述
2、影响因股权激励契约特征而异:股权激励方案的有效期越长, 样本公司研发投入的增加越明显;实施股票期权类的方案及激励方案有效期越长的企业, 所获发明专利的增加越明显;实施限制性股票及激励方案有效期越短的企业, 其外观设计专利的增长越多。本文的研究结果表明, 股权激励方案的契约结构对管理层实质性创新与策略性创新的动机选择具有重大影响。本文的研究发现对股权激励理论与实务均具有重要意义。关键词： 股权激励; 契约特征; 企业创新; 作者简介：李丹蒙 (1980-) , 男, 河北石家庄人, 讲师, 会计学博士, 研究领域是资本市场与企业创新;E-mail:;作者简介：万华林 (1976-) , 男, 江
3、西南昌人, 教授, 会计学博士, 研究领域是财务会计与公司治理, E-mail:。收稿日期：2017-07-02基金：国家自然科学基金项目“公开上市对企业创新活动的影响” (71502060) Equity Incentive Contracts Characteristics and Firm InnovationLI Dan-meng WAN Hua-lin School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology; School of Accountancy, Shanghai Lixin University
4、 of Accounting and Finance; Abstract： Lots of literature in economics, finance, and management show that innovative activities have always been seen as one of the most important drivers of economic growth. The Incentive of corporate managers who are the main decision makers of innovation activities
5、is vital to firm innovation. This paper focus on the equity incentive plans adopted by Chinese listed firms. Based on agency theory and other related theoretic framework in economics and corporate finance, the paper develops some hypotheses for testing. First, the paper gives a pair of competing hyp
6、otheses on whether the adoption of equity incentive will enhance firms innovative activities or not. Second, the paper digs into the effects of equity incentive contracts characteristics such as incentivevtype ( options or restricted stocks) , incentive intensity ( stocks granted through incentive c
7、ontracts) , and incentive period ( duration of the incentive plans) on firms innovation.Using data of 2007 to 2014 from Chinese listed firms, this paper examines the effects of equity incentive and the characteristics of incentive contracts on firm innovation. In order to reduce the concerns of self
8、-selection and other endogenous problems, this paper adopts a “dynamic perspective ” instead of traditional association study. Specifically, this paper uses a research design of Propensity Score Matching ( PSM) plus Difference-in-Difference ( DID) . In the paper, firms adopted equity incentive contr
9、acts are seen as treated sample while those without adoption of equity incentive contracts are treated as control sample. By using PSM, the paper choose a group of subsample firms from control sample to carefully match treated sample in order to reduce the endogenous concerns. The paper uses nearest
10、vneighbor criterion for matching and controls a group of variables such as firm size, profitability, asset structure, growth, management compensation, ownership etc. After finishing the matching work, the paper runs a difference-in-difference regression using treated and matching control sample firm
11、s. With the PSM and DID research design, the paper finds that sample companies R&D expenditures and the number of patents granted increase after the adoption of equity incentive plans. This finding is robust to various model selection and variables substitutions. Overall, there is a positive relatio
12、n between the adoption of equity incentive plans and firms innovative input ( R& D expenditures) and output ( patents granted) .Moreover, the paper tests the effects of incentive contracts characteristics including incentive types, incentive intensity, and the duration period on innovation activitie
13、s. The results show that the duration period has a positive significant effect on sample companies R& D expenditures, with more innovative inputs for longer duration period. On one hand, Companies are granted with more invention-type patents which are seen as strong innovative results when managers
14、are granted with stock-option type incentive plans and when the incentive plans have longer duration period. On the other hand, companies gain more appearance design-type patents which are seen as low innovative results with incentive plans using restricted stocks and shorter duration incentive peri
15、od. The paper does not find any evidence of the effects of incentive intensity on firms innovative activities maybe due to the restrictions on incentive percentages from the regulatory agencies.In conclusion, this paper shows that equity incentive plans and their contracting characteristics have sig
16、nificant influences on companies real and strategic innovative choices in one of the most important transitional economies. This paper provides some evidence that supports the positive effects of equity incentive plans on firms innovative activities. Also, we should emphasize the importance of incentive plans characteristics such as incentive type ( option like or restricted stocks like) , incentive intensity, and the duration period. T
