TheBankCapitalChannelof

上传人:nt****6 文档编号:24901017 上传时间:2017-12-08 格式:PDF 页数:59 大小:602.15KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
TheBankCapitalChannelof_第1页
第1页 / 共59页
TheBankCapitalChannelof_第2页
第2页 / 共59页
TheBankCapitalChannelof_第3页
第3页 / 共59页
TheBankCapitalChannelof_第4页
第4页 / 共59页
TheBankCapitalChannelof_第5页
第5页 / 共59页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《TheBankCapitalChannelof》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《TheBankCapitalChannelof(59页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、 The Bank Capital Channel of Monetary Policy Skander J. Van den Heuvel*Department of Finance The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania This version: June 2007 Abstract This paper examines the role of bank lending in the transmission of monetary policy in the presence of capital adequacy regulati

2、ons. I develop a dynamic model of bank asset and liability management that incorporates risk-based capital requirements and an imperfect market for bank equity. These conditions imply a failure of the Modigliani-Miller theorem for the bank: its lending will depend on the banks financial structure, a

3、s well as on lending opportunities and market interest rates. Combined with a maturity mismatch on the banks balance sheet, this gives rise to a bank capital channel by which monetary policy affects bank lending through its impact on bank equity capital. This mechanism does not rely on any particula

4、r role of bank reserves and thus falls outside the conventional bank lending channel. I analyze the dynamics of the new channel. An important result is that monetary policy effects on bank lending depend on the capital adequacy of the banking sector; lending by banks with low capital has a delayed a

5、nd then amplified reaction to interest rate shocks, relative to well-capitalized banks. Other implications are that bank capital affects lending even when the regulatory constraint is not momentarily binding, and that shocks to bank profits, such as loan defaults, can have a persistent impact on len

6、ding. (JEL Classification numbers: E440, E520, G280) *Email: vdheuvelwharton.upenn.edu. I would like to thank Christopher Sims, William Brainard and Stefan Krieger for valuable advice and comments. I would also like to thank Andrew Abel, Ben Bernanke, Patrick Bolton, Giancarlo Corsetti, Gaston Gelos

7、, Joao Gomes, George Hall, Michael Krause, Stephen Morris, Nagpurnanand Prabhala, Jeremy Stein, Eric Swanson, and numerous seminar participants for valuable comments. Traditional monetary theory has largely ignored the role of bank equity. Bank-centered accounts of how monetary policy affects the re

8、al economy usually focus on the role of reserves in determining the volume of demand deposits. In addition, the bank lending channel thesis maintains that monetary policy actions can also alter the supply of bank loans by changing bank reserves. While reserve requirements play a central role in thes

9、e theories, bank capital1and capital regulations are at best discussed as an afterthought. This paper constitutes an attempt to fill this gap by taking the risk-based capital requirements of the Basle Accord explicitly into account. It provides a framework for analyzing the consequences of these reg

10、ulations for bank lending and the response of lending to monetary policy actions in a dynamic setting. The incorporation of bank capital effects is motivated by two sets of considerations. First, it is generally agreed that bank capital is an important factor in bank asset and liability management a

11、nd that its importance has likely increased since the implementation of the risk-based capital requirements of the 1988 Basle Accord. The implementation of these regulations, along with other factors, has often been blamed for a perceived credit crunch immediately prior and during the 1990-91 recess

12、ion. In fact, the term capital crunch has been suggested as a more apt description for the reduction in lending during this episode, in view of the role of bank capital.2The evidence from state and bank level data shows that low bank capital has been associated with sluggish lending during this peri

13、od.3In addition, there is some more general evidence that the cost of loans depends on bank capital. Using a matched sample of individual loans, borrowers and banks, R. Glenn Hubbard, Kenneth N. Kuttner, and Darius N. Palia (2001) find that higher bank capital lowers the rate charged on loans, even

14、after controlling for borrower characteristics, other bank characteristics and loan contract terms.4If bank capital is a 1I use the terms bank equity and bank capital interchangeably to refer to the book value of bank equity. I will be more precise about the regulatory definitions below. 2Richard F.

15、 Syron (1991). See also Ben S. Bernanke and Cara S. Lown (1991). 3See Steven A. Sharpe (1995) for an overview. In his judgement, the research has been less successful in determining whether this association is due to a causal effect of bank capital on loan supply or due to the effect of persistent v

16、ariation in loan demand on capital. 4In addition, Joe Peek, Eric S. Rosengren and Geoffrey M. B. Tootell (1999 and 2003) show that confidential supervisory bank ratings, which partly reflect capital adequacy, predict GDP growth even when controlling for commercial or Fed forecasts of growth. Interestingly, they also find that this information is used by the FOMC in decisions on the Federal Funds target rate. 1significant determinant of loan supply, then it is important t

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 行业资料 > 其它行业文档

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号