《政治语言研究_评述与思考_田海龙》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《政治语言研究_评述与思考_田海龙（7页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2002年 1月第 23卷第 1期外语教学Foreign Language EducationJan. 2002Vol. 23 No. 1:I田海龙(天津商学院外语系天津 300400)K1:本文主要评述近几年政治语言研究的一些理论观点和研究方法。通过讨论分析政治语言的含义、政治语言研究的发展形成和研究方法,指出政治语言研究区别于其他语言研究的一个特点:它研究政治活动的参与者如何运用语言达到自己的政治目的(如施加影响)以及公众如何通过他们使用的语言认识这些政治活动的参与者(如他们是亲和还是专横)。语言与政治的关系研究为我们提出了建构政治语言学理论框架的课题,对此本文作者进行了思考。1oM:政治
2、语言;政治语言研究;认识政治活动参与者;政治语言学ms|: H0DSM: AcI|: 1000-5544( 2002)01-0023-07Abstract: This articleis a critical survey of recent political language study ( PLS) in terms of itstheoretical viewpoints and practical methods. Based on the analysis of PLS characteristics, its de-velopment and approaches, theart
3、icleargues that PLS concerns itself with thewaysin which polit-ical actors realize their motives ( e. g. undercutting) by making use of language and the ways inwhich theaudience perceive the true nature of the political actors ( e. g. whether they are intimateor aggressive) by analyzing their langua
4、ge. Thearticle also argues that PLS has its distinctive fea-tures that makeit different from otherlinguisticapproaches and that PLSdeserves such anew termof its own as political linguistics.Key words: political language; political language study; perception of political actors; political lin-guistic
5、sM。 Chilton &Schaffner: “BZEL,6BZV?3V|ZE。7,3,BZEk,V8C?m。t?LY(VU)、1M。t?L,#85。1#1?,v1#8,51MP、P。7,V8、5、?BZ,1s8C+,V|。5.1yOI1987M1BEL=CsT( Geis)(nWilson,1990: 16),X13MN。1978MHudsonC、1969MOrwell?V“” ,XE+MN。TInJ,N。7,1C。xBtEn5MidVl?,9iBQ,Y1?,BLl,V。Z,Tl。YVr,91YVMt。s1c。j,9PIB5,B13i。,TT=Q,#?,8Vl,9L。S,.s,“y,Bt(
6、Ss)T)N4。”(b, 2001)5N,Btcn。+Xsitting:csiting|。 sitF-ing1siting,13t,52siting:c,72saiting:c。B2B、=5。l,sbB,=,MY。d:1eym,、$,eym,2000(4): 21-25。ID1 Beard, A. The Language of PoliticsM. London:Routledge, 2000.2 Chilton, P. & Schaffner, C. Discourse and PoliticsA. In Discourse as Social Interaction C.van Dijk
7、.(ed. ) London: Sage Publications Ltd,1997: 206-230.3 Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. Critical Discourse Anal-ysis A. Discourse as Social Interaction C.van Dijk.(ed. ) London: Sage Publications, 1997: 258-284.4 Freed, A. & Greenwood, A. Women, Men, and Typeof Talk: What Makes the Difference? J. Languagei
8、n Society. March,1996: 1-26.5 Geis, M. The Language of PoliticsM. New York:Springer Verlag,1987.6 Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. Cohesion in EnglishM. Britain: Longman, 1976.7 Hodge, B. & Louie, K. The Politics of Chinese Lan-guageand CultureM. London: Routledge,1998.8 Holborow, M. The Politics of E
9、nglish M. London:Sage Publications, 1999.9 Hudson, K. The Language of Modern PoliticsM.London: Macmillan,1978.10 Lakoff, R. Talking Power: the Politics of Languagein Our LivesM. USA: BasicBooks,1990.11 Levinson, S. C. Pragmatics M. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press,1983.12 McNair, B. An Introdu
10、ction to Political Communica-tion M. London: Routledge,1999.13 Muhlhausler, P. & Harre, R. Pronouns and People:The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal I-dentity M. Oxford: Basil Blackwell,1990.14 Ng, S. H. & Bradac, J. Power in Language M.London: Sage Publications,1993.15 Orwell, G. Polit
11、ics and the English Language A.In W. F. Bolton and D. Crystal (eds). The EnglishLanguage C.vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press,1969.16 Quirk, R. et al. A Grammar of Contemporary Eng-lish M . London: Longman,1972. 17 Tian, Hailong. Review of The Politics of ChineseLanguage and Culture J. Discourse and Society.11(3),2000: 424-426.18 . Review of The Politics of English and The Lan-guage of PoliticsJ. Discourse and So
