Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译

上传人:豆浆 文档编号:15985735 上传时间:2017-11-06 格式:DOC 页数:7 大小:30.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Explore cooperative learning Mathematics-毕业论文翻译(7页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、1Explore cooperative learning MathematicsCooperative learning is a new round of curriculum reform in China initiated an important way of learning, cooperative learning groups are the basic form. Cooperative learning is not only an individuals learning behavior, and behavior or a group activity. Coop

2、erative learning theory itself that originated in the 20th century, the study of modern social psychology. from the perspective of social psychology, understanding of cooperative learning in a targeted manner in the individual behavior of several typical theoretical significance is very realistic, i

3、t is conducive to cooperative learning on the behavior of group members changes in form and thought more clearly understand in order to take better measures. First, the social loafing effect Social psychology of a person working in groups as a single person working harder as the tendency of social l

4、oafing effect. According to class before the expected, cooperative learning is the “Three Stooges is a great space,” that is greater than the overall effect the effect of the parts; but in cooperative learning, team members often find that you push me to, assigned tasks complaining 2too much or do n

5、ot like it used to push to the other members of the difficulties, and ultimately unable to complete the task, resulting in less overall part of the effect of the social loafing effect. 1, no sense of fairness. It is often used their own efforts and received awards and others (or past self) efforts a

6、nd rewards obtained are compared, the results show that if the comparison is fair and reasonable, then will feel comfortable to continue to work hard, when we compare the results obtained the opposite result, it will have no sense of fairness affect their enthusiasm to play. 2, “diffusion of respons

7、ibility.” Refers to the so-called diffusion of responsibility to work together with others, the individual responsible down, will work a tendency to do onto others. Have the duty to spread because of the pressure points to the responsibility of groups spread out in groups to fall to the responsibili

8、ty of everyone very much. Therefore, there is no personal responsibility for the pressure, and rely on each other so have excuse. We see more people, the more severe diffusion 3of responsibility, individual responsibility, the lower and reduce the number, it will enhance the sense of responsibility.

9、 Second, to personalize Refers to the individual to individual in the population may lose self-identity and sense of responsibility, loss of self-control, behavior presumptuous, showing separately the behavior does not make. This decline in self-control often makes the increase in violations of indi

10、vidual students , responsibility generally fade, dry out the things that normally would not make. Many studies, some students (especially low-grade students), once cooperative learning would show different degrees of normal is not much excited about the phenomenon occurs, such as wanton talk, the ar

11、gument sounds too large, random walk, random questions such as “noisy”, “buzz” the phenomenon of de-personalization. lead to personalized key factor is the role and responsibilities of decentralized anonymous. As the role and responsibilities of decentralized anonymous to allow some students to deve

12、lop speaking irresponsible behavior quieter than usual attitude. 4Cooperative learning environment in the individual can really lead to negative effects. For example, classroom activities, group work, the buzz of the discussion seems keen to solve the problem but has no real meaning; students to tal

13、k, may interfere with other groups of normal discussion atmosphere. but should be seen and sometimes can also be personalized to play a more positive meaning, as a way to understand, compared to the individual is free to students, more participation in co-operation into the performance of students i

14、n this state courage to free the imagination, unconventional and innovative, so that personality can be developed. reposted elsewhere in the paper for free download http:/three, “free-rider effect” and the “Matthew Effect” The so-called “free-rider effect” refers to the interest groups, a member of

15、the interest groups for the efforts of all people have within the group might benefit, but the cost of personal commitment by the people, and this is free-rider effect. in cooperative study of all members of the group although there is an objective common interests, but from the perspective of socia

16、l psychology, but it is easier to form “free rider” psychological 5expectations, individual student activities, or simply stand idly by when the lack of initiative , reap the profits; surface, and some students involved in activities not actually use their brains, do not concentrate on the activities did not play its due role and other “free rider” phenomenon. Have a “free-rider effect” for many reasons, first and foremost objective to heterogeneous grouping of stud

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 学术论文 > 毕业论文

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号