(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文

上传人:精****库 文档编号:139929986 上传时间:2020-07-25 格式:DOCX 页数:40 大小:66.73KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文_第1页
第1页 / 共40页
(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文_第2页
第2页 / 共40页
(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文_第3页
第3页 / 共40页
(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文_第4页
第4页 / 共40页
(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文_第5页
第5页 / 共40页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《(2020年)企业管理制度论我国别居制度的构建论文(40页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、四川大学硕士学位论文论我国别居制度的构建专业:法律硕士研究生:张哲 指导教师:赵小平副教授别居制度起源于古罗马,原是禁止离婚主义的产物,伴随着宗教的改革和婚姻观念的转变,它被赋予新的内涵和功能,发挥了不可估量的作用。在大多数国家对离婚制度实行婚姻破裂主义为主要标准的今天,现代别居制度是离婚制度的补充,亦是证明婚姻破裂的一种重要方式。虽然我国没有别居制度,但是我国婚姻法把夫妻因感情不和,分居满两年的作为法定的离婚理由之一。然而在实务中,由于婚姻生活的隐蔽性,对于分居事实的认定,分居时间的起算,分居期间父母对子女的权利和义务,分居期间夫妻的共同财产,分居期间家事代理权,均没有相应的规定,这不仅给司

2、法实践操作带来很大的困难,也极大了增加了夫妻关系的复杂性,不利于和谐社会的构建。本文通过分析比较国外与港、澳、台别居制度的立法实践,以及别居制度在我国的实践经验,并结合我国的国情,重点分析了我国建立别居制度的必要性和可行性,在程序上,试着将别居制度与我国的调解制度相衔接。论述了未来我国婚姻立法中应引用别居制度,并就未来我国建立别居制度提出粗浅的构想和建议。本文共有四个部分,第一部分是别居制度概述。首先对别居制度的起源、概念、构成要件、种类进行简单叙述,在明确界定别居的基础上,进而对别居制度和其他制度加以比较,力图发觉其立法原意并理清其发展脉络。第二部分是国外及港、澳、台地区的别居制度对我国的立

3、法启示。通过对比大陆法系和英美法系两种制度,以及参考港、澳、台地区别居制度立法,在借鉴先进理论的基础上,以期从中发现规律,取其精华,并结合我国的特点,提出建议,进而来完善我国的婚姻家庭法。第三部分是我国别居制度的必要性和可行性。在结合我国国情的基础上,提出建立别居制度的必要性;在我国已有的深厚的别居理论基础和大量的别居实践基础上,进一步来论证别居制度在我国建立的可行性。第四部分是对我国别居制度的立法构想。在从历史的角度分析别居制度,对比国外和港、澳、台地区别居制度的立法以及论述别居制度在我国存在的必要性和可行性之后,在结合我国国情的基础上,对我国别居制度的构建提出一些粗浅的立法建议,以期构建具

4、有我国特色的别居制度。关键词:别居 别居制度 婚姻制度 立法构想Discussion on the Construction of Separation System in ChinaMajor: Master of LawPostgraduate student:Zhang Zhe Tutor:Professor Zhao XiaopingJudicial separation system originates in ancient Rome, which is originally the product of the prohibit divorce socialist. Along

5、with the reformation of religion and the change of the marriage concept, it is endowed with new connotation and function and plays an immeasurable role in the modern marriage system. In todays society, most countries can judge divorce when marriage is broken. Judicial separation system in modern tim

6、es is a complement to divorce system and also an important way of marriage breakdown. Although there has been no separation system, due to Chinas Marriage Law, the feelings of marital discord, separation for two years is thought as one of the statutory grounds for divorce. However, in the actual leg

7、al affairs, there were no corresponding provisions for the verification of the separation, separation of the time, the rights and obligations for their children, the couples common property, the family agency during the period of separation. This is not only puts the operation of the judicial practi

8、ce into great difficulties, but also greatly increases the complexity of the relationship between husband and wife, which is not conducive to build a harmonious society. By comparing separation system of legislative practice in foreign country, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, as well as other separatio

9、n system in Chinas experience, this paper combines with Chinas national conditions and focuses on analyzing the necessity and feasibility to establish the separation system in China. The paper also tries linking up with judicial separation system and Chinas mediation system in the procedure. It disc

10、usses that our marriage legislation should apply the judicial separation system and proposes shallow ideas and suggestions for the establishment of that. This paper consists of four parts. The first part is an overview of separation system. Firstly, I have had a brief description of the origin, the

11、concept of elements and the species of the separation system. On the clear definition of separation system basis, then I have compared with other systems, trying to find the legislative intent and to clarify the context of its development.The second part is our countrys legislative inspiration from

12、foreign countries, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions. By comparing the continental law system and common law system, referring to the legislation of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, on the basis of drawing on advanced theory, so that we could find the rule and absorb their quintessence. And in combina

13、tion with our country characteristics, I put forward some suggestions so as to improve Chinas Marriage Law.The third part is the necessity and feasibility of our separation system. Combining with the actual situation in China, I have put forward the necessity of building our separation system. We ha

14、ve had profound theoretical basis and a large number of such practices, further to prove the feasibility of establishing that in China.The fourth part is the idea of the legislation of our countrys separation system. After analysing the separation system from a historical point, contrasting the legi

15、slation of foreign countries, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and discussing the necessity and feasibility of building it, I have put forward some superficial legislative proposals to build it in China on the basis of Chinas national conditions, in order to build an characteristic separation system in o

16、ur country. Keywords: Live Apart; The Separation System; Marriage; Legislation Idea目 录1综 述12别居制度概述12.1别居制度的起源和发展12.2别居制度的概念和内涵42.3别居的构成要件52.3.1别居的主体要件52.3.2别居的主观要件62.3.3别居的客观要件62.3.4别居的因果关系要件62.4别居制度的种类72.5别居制度与离婚制度82.5.1别居前置制82.5.2别居与离婚任意选择制92.5.3只承认离婚制92.6别居制度与调解制度93国外及港、澳、台地区别居制度的立法103.1法国别居制度的相关立法103.2德国别居制度的相关立法123.3英国别居制度的相关立法133

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 企业文档

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号