《SCI投稿常用询问信》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《SCI投稿常用询问信（5页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、SCI 投稿常用询问信 转帖 我的询问信 Dear Editors We dispatched our manuscript manuscript ID 8558192903066551 to your journal about ten weeks ago We have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision We fear that our submission process does not meet the requirements and should be gra
2、teful if you kindly give us some information regarding the status of the manuscript Thanks for your information With kind regards SCI 投稿常用英语 一 投稿信 1 Dear Dr Defendi ML I am sending a manuscript entitled by which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of Yours sincerely 2 Dea
3、r Dr A Enclosed is a manuscript entitled by sb which we are submitting for publication in the journal of We have chosen this journal because it deals with We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal s readers 3 Dear Dr A Please find enclosed for your review an original research article b
4、y sb All authors have read and approve this version of the article and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript and we have attached to this letter the sig
5、ned letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers 二 询问有无收到稿件 Dear Editors We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not as yet receive ackn
6、owledgement of their safe arrival We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them If not we will send our manuscript again Thank you in advance for your help 三 询问论文审查回音 Dear Editors It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our m
7、anuscript No for possible publication in your journal I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible 四 关于论文的总体审查意见 1 This is a carefully done study and the findings are of consid
8、erable interest A few minor revision are list below 2 This is a well written paper containing interesting results which merit publication For the benefit of the reader however a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification There are given below 3 Although the
9、se observation are interesting they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as 4 Although this paper is good it would be ever better if some ext
10、ra data were added 5 This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of 6 Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper As you will see I have made some corre
11、ction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory 7 We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of
12、English preferable native speaker 8 The wording and style of some section particularly those concerning HPLC need careful editing Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined 9 Preliminary experiments only have been done and with
13、exception of that summarized in Table 2 none has been repeated This is clearly unsatisfactory particularly when there is so much variation between assays 10 The condition of incubation are poorly defined What is the temperature Were antibody used 五 给编辑的回信 1 In reply to the referee s main criticism o
14、f paper it is possible to say that One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1 This has now been corrected Further minor changes had been made on page 3 paragraph 1 line 3 8 and 2 line 6 11 These do not affect our interpretation of the
15、result 2 I have read the referee s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done This was for the sake of brevity rather than an er
16、ror or omission 3 Thank you for your letter of and for the referee s comments concerning our manuscript entitled We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval 4 I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee s suggestion You will see that our original findings are confirmed 5 We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers Revised portion are underlin
