《外文翻译--产业集群：对不同理论的批判性解读-公开DOC·毕业论文》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《外文翻译--产业集群：对不同理论的批判性解读-公开DOC·毕业论文（14页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、.外文翻译目录外文原稿1.2中文译文1.8外文原稿2.12中文译文2.17外文翻译之一Competition and Cooperation in Industrial Cluster: The Implication for Public PolicyDavid NewlandsEnglishEuropean Planning Studies, Vol.11, No.5(2003)2. Industrial Clusters: A Critical Reading of Different Theories2.1Standard Agglomeration Theory, From Mars
2、hall OnwardsMarshall, in his writings on Sheffield, Lancashire and other British regions, viewed the main source of external economies as the commons, the infrastructure and other services from which each individual firm in an industrial district might draw (Marshall, 1921). Examples include, in mod
3、ern terminology, improved job search and job matching, more favorable access to capital finance and inter-firm labor migration. The availability of such common resources to a number of firms then enhances their size and diversity as both capital and labor are attracted to such areas to exploit the l
4、arger markets for their services. This in turn leads to reductions in factor prices and/or increases in factor productivities. These are the ways in which the external benefit to firms of a location in the industrial district manifests itself. Unit production costs will be lower within the industria
5、l district than out with it. Parallel to his studies of industrial organization, in the various editions of his Principles of Economics, Marshall (1890, 1920) helped develop what was to become standard agglomeration theory. This was then built upon subsequently by a number of writers. For example, S
6、citovsky (1954) identified a further category of pecuniary external economies, Perroux (1955) contributed his famous theory of growth poles, and Chinitz (1961) applied the notion of agglomeration economies to the economic development of New York and Pittsburgh. More recently, Krugman (1991, 1995) ha
7、s emphasized the importance of increasing returns as a favorable condition for the development of external economies. Porter (1990) can also be understood as belonging to this lineage in the sense that external economies make up many of the key relationships within his famous diamond.Standard agglom
8、eration theory provides an explanation of why firms might cluster together, sharing a commons of business services and a diversified labour force, and forming extensive local linkages with other firms. However, it conforms to neo-classical theory in that local economies are viewed as collections of
9、atomistic businesses, aware of one another solely through the intermediation of price/cost signals. Firms continue to compete with each other although Marshall was keen to warn of the risks that firms collaboration, in the development of shared inputs, risked blunting competitive forces.2.2 Transact
10、ion Costs: The Californian SchoolIn the writings of the Californian school, the disintegration of productive systems leads to an increase in firms transaction costs (Scott & Storper, 1986; Scott, 1988; Storper, 1989). Changes in market and technological conditions have led to increased uncertainty a
11、nd greater risks of over capacity (of labour and capital) and of being locked into redundant technologies.The response of deepening the organizational division of labour leads to an increase in the number of formal market transactions external to the firm. There may also be an increase in the unpred
12、ictability and complexity of transactions. The costs of carrying out certain types of transaction-especially those where tacit knowledge is important or trust is required and thus complete contracting is impossible-varies systematically with distance. Thus, agglomeration is the result of the minimiz
13、ation of these types of transactions costs in a situation where such minimization outweighs other production cost differentials.The Californian school sought to explain observed agglomerations of economic activity. The argument centered on the localization of traded interdependencies-or simple input
14、-output relations-but this is at best only a partial explanation, not least in being unable to distinguish convincingly between good and bad agglomerations. Agglomerations have been found in high wage, technologically advanced industries and low wage technologically stagnant ones alike while there a
15、re technologically dynamic agglomerations which lack the dense inter-firm linkages and coordinating institutions of a new industrial district.Nor is it clear whether markets will succeed in coordinating transactions within clusters (Cooke & Morgan, 1993). The management of traded interdependencies is exactly what we think of as the busi
