《欧盟物联网白皮书》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《欧盟物联网白皮书（21页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、Coordination And Support Action for Global RFID related Activities and Standardisation EU Project Number 216803 CASAGRAS will provide a framework of foundation studies to assist the European Commission and the global community in defining and accommodating international issues and developments conce
2、rning radio frequency identification RFID with particular reference to the emerging Internet of Things WP7 Socio economic components of RFID usage in the Internet of Things White Paper v4a Issued 6 April 2009 WP71 DRAFT White Paper WP7 Issued May 2009 1 1 Introduction 1 1The Social Connection with t
3、he Internet of Things 1 1Awareness Public Perception and Social Change 2 2 Technology enablers of things ubiquitous and Internet of Things 2 1The Privacy Imperative 2 2Outline Methodology for Designing Privacy into RFID Applications 2 3A Standard for Design for Privacy and Security 3 3Safety Issues
4、concerning RFID and Radio based Systems 4 4Structure and Governance for the Internet of Things WP72 WP7 Socio economic components of RFID usage in the Internet of Things Contents In principle the Internet of Things IoT based upon popular perceptions may be considered as a structure in which human in
5、tervention is minimised but in which activities are directed at serving human kind either directly or indirectly and at various levels of human enterprise domestic corporate public national and international A paradigm shift in nature and scale is envisaged within the Internet of Things which will i
6、nevitably have a profound impact upon society in much the same way as the Internet and the world wide web have impacted upon everyday life and the commercial world While the level of impact is likely to be different the nature of the impact is likely to be as far reaching and as radical and revoluti
7、onary as the Internet itself In considering the socio economic issues arising from the developments in RFID and the Internet of Things it is both relevant and important to reflect upon the opinion expressed by the European Economic and Social Committee EESC in its published statement of the 18th Sep
8、tember 2008 This was in response to a consultation request from the European Commission under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community on the subject of The Internet of Things exploratory opinion The conclusions and recommendations presented in this opinion were as follows The E
9、ESC encourages the EU Commission to 2 4Invest in research to support dissemination such as the past presidency events and standard setting activities because they consider the Internet of Things IOT domain important 2 5Take measures to remove barriers that would hamper the taking up of the technolog
10、y 2 6Assess whether centralised systems will be able to handle the amount of traffic that can be expected of IOT applications and if local governance of names and services are a better approach to manage mass deployment 2 7Investigate whether the current existing directives handle the data protectio
11、n and security requirements adequately or if new legislative measures are needed 2 8Consider the need for some laboratories in Europe with combined funding from universities and private companies in order to ensure that research results are taken up in Europe and to counter a brain drain of research
12、ers to research facilities and enterprises in other parts of the world US 2 9On the issue of eventual electromagnetic risks the principle of precaution should apply for these new environments with a high density of wave readers in particular for the workers in such environments They should be inform
13、ed about any potential risks and methods of protection should be put in place All the same the question should be seriously assessed through scientific studies WP73 WP7 Socio economic components of RFID usage in the Internet of Things 1 1 Introduction 2 10Remember that technology development should
14、be done for the people and that there is a need to evaluate the related ethical risks 2 11For trans European services the European Commission or the independent administrative authority that may regulate the spectrum in the future should consider the spectrum needs of the Internet of Things 2 12Rese
15、arch will be crucial to win the race to deliver computing capacity to handle future real time Internet of Things applications Within this opinion statement there is clear support for RFID and the concept being developed for the Internet of Things Removing barriers to take up and for research to adva
16、nce the realisation of the Internet of Things are also explicit in the statement From a clearly social perspective data protection privacy security ethical risk assessment and safety of systems constitute particularly important issues Governance is a further issue that is likely to have impact from a social perspective but only features in a closing paragraph pointing to the notion that the new network poses problems of governance in view of its scale content and universal standards requirements
