(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹

上传人:管****问 文档编号:126363806 上传时间:2020-03-24 格式:DOC 页数:7 大小:45.07KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《(企管MBA)MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹(7页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、 QQ:760189864 400-618-2500MBA英语阅读精讲汇粹(31)Passage Thirty One (The Affect of Electricity on Cancer) Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed t

2、o studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to

3、 personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimateor the worst kind of paranoia. Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from

4、the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence “suggests a casual link

5、” between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fieldsthose having very longwave-lengthsand leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as “a possible, but not proven, cause

6、 of cancer in humans.” The report is no reason to panicor even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pen

7、tagon and the Whit House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed. At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, tit generates an electromagnetic field that

8、exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of

9、 the earths own magnetic field, The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate. How could

10、such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such “ionizing” radiati

11、ons have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions. But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields c

12、an have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found. The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having “biased the entire docume

13、nt” toward proving a link. “Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer,” the Air Force concludes. “It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report.” Then Pentagons concern is unders

14、tandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. 1. The main idea of this passage is A. studies on the cause of cancer B.

15、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer C. the relationship between electricity and cancer. D. different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner. 2. The view-point of the EPA is A. there is casual link between electricity and cancer. B. electricity really affects cancer. C. controver

16、sial. D.low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer 3. Why did the Pentagon and Whit House object to the release of the report? Because A. it may stir a great deal of debate among the Bush Administration. B. every unit of the modern military has depended on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment. C. the Pentagons concer

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 经营企划

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号