《从语言冲突的角度看改革开放后英语对大陆标准现代汉语的影响(1)》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《从语言冲突的角度看改革开放后英语对大陆标准现代汉语的影响(1)（87页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、河南科技大学 硕士学位论文 从语言冲突的角度看改革开放后英语对大陆标准现代汉语的影 响 姓名：严佳 申请学位级别：硕士 专业：外国语言学及应用语言学 指导教师：钟庆伦 20080601 摘 要 I 论文题目 从语言冲突的角度看改革开放后 英语对大陆标准现代汉语的影响 专 业 外国语言学及应用语言学 研 究 生 严 佳 指导教师 钟 庆 伦 摘 要 随着 2008 年的到来我国的改革开放政策已经走进了第 30 个年头回首 世界各国在这 30 年间的发展历程我们不难发现为了加强政治经济文 化科技等方面的交流国与国间的接触也愈加频繁全球化背景下各国间各 层面的交流都会产生语言接触继而就不可避免地产生
2、语言变化而后当语言接 触达到一定的频繁程度语言冲突随即显现正如皮特汉斯内尔德所指出的 那样哪里有语言接触哪里就有语言冲突同样在这 30 年中中国在 加快自身发展步伐的同时也获得了越来越多的国际交流和海外贸易的机会汉 语作为世界语言大家庭中的重要一员自然也会受到语言冲突的影响自改革 开放以来情况尤为如此汉语中词汇借用现象就是语言冲突最强有力的证据 在过去的 30 年里大陆标准现代汉语中出现了大量的词汇借用数量已远远超 过词汇借用在汉语发展史上的其他任何时期然而正如学者季羡林在异文化 的使者外来词的序言中所说在中国很少有学者开始研究外来词甚 至更少这与中国正在发起的伟大改革是不相称的英语外来词占据
3、了汉 语中所有外来词总量的半数以上关于英语对汉语造成的影响这一课题如果在 词汇方面层面还未曾展开彻底的研究在形态和句法层面相关研究无疑更将是 一片空白因此加强有关英语对汉语影响规律的系统探求将具有重大意义社 会语言学翻译学跨文化交际学等方向的研究也能从中获益 本文在借助郭鸿杰博士有关英语对现代汉语影响的理论框架基础上结合 皮特汉斯内尔德的语言冲突理论从大众传媒中主要以报纸和网络为主 寻找例证以求探询英语在词汇形态和句法等层面上对大陆标准现代汉语的影 响之所以从大众传媒中选取材料不仅仅是因为这两种传播渠道占据了传统传 播学定义中四大传播媒体的半壁江山更是因为中国的大众传媒肩负着特殊的责 任宣传政
4、府政策引导公民舆论因此由此而来的例证将更具代表性和说服 力然而作者并未止步于此而是转向更深层次的探索即从其他学科领域发现 造成该语言冲突的深层动因这种跨学科的研究主要来自对宏观经济学和社会学 Masters Dissertation of Henan University of Science and Technology II 的透视借用其中的某些理论追溯语言冲突的缘由例如微观经济学中的乘数效 应挤出效应以及社会学中的社会网络概念等等这也是本文的亮点所在希 望此举能够对日后语言政策和语言规划的制定起到少许帮助以便在全球化的交 往中使我们的母语在吸收其它语言优点的同时也受到一定的保护 关 键
5、词语言接触语言冲突影响大陆标准现代汉语 论文类型基础研究 Abstract III Subject: Influence Exerted by English on Mainland Modern Standard Chinese since the Reform and Opening-up Policy from the Perspective of Language Conflict Specialty: Foreign Linguistics and Applied Linguistics Name: Yan Jia Supervisor: Zhong Qinglun Abstract
6、 With the coming year of 2008, the policy of reform and opening-up has been implemented for almost 30 years. Through the exchange of politics, economy, culture, and science, countries all over the world in these thirty years have obtained extensive contacts with one another. Under such a global sett
7、ing, that language contact becomes language conflict will definitely be the routine planned by nature for all languages involved, just as what Peter Hans Nelde points out “Wherever there is language contact, there will be language conflict.” Also in these thirty years, China has been speeding up her
8、 pace of development and obtaining more opportunities in the international communications and oversea trades. Our Chinese, as an important member with most speakers in the world languages family, inevitably falls in the game of language contact and language conflict. This is especially true ever sin
9、ce our carrying out the reform and opening-up policy. Culture contact and contact in some other aspects necessarily breeds language contact, and language contact unavoidably brings about language change. With language contact escalating to a certain level, language change leads to language conflict
10、finally. Lexical borrowing is the quickest answer to this language problem. In the past three decades or so, Mainland Modern Standard Chinese absorbs a great number of loanwords, and the number and growing rate exceed that of any other time in the long history of Chinese. However, as the scholar Ji
11、Xianlin says in the preface of 异文化的使者外来词, “few scholars in China have been specializing in the study of loanwords, and even fewer This does not assort with the being-launched grand reform in China.” The number of English loanwords in Chinese takes up about half of the Chinese loanword vocabulary. If
12、 study of loanwords from English has not be thoroughly conducted, studies about the influence of English at other Chinese structural levelssuch as morphological and Masters Dissertation of Henan University of Science and Technology IV syntactic, will be a bigger blank. Therefore, it is of great sign
13、ificance to study systematically the influence of English on Chinese at different levels, which will also benefit the researches of sociolinguistics, translation, and intercultural communication. The present paper, based on Doctor Guo Hongjies theoretical framework as to the influence of English on
14、Mainland Chinese and Peter Hans Neldes theory of language conflict, tries to find data from mass media (mainly from newspaper and internet) as powerful and convincible supports to prove that English has already influenced Mainland Modern Standard Chinese at lexical, morphological, and syntactic leve
15、l. To choose data from two channels newspaper and internet is not only because these two channels take up half of the traditionally defined channels in the field of communications but also because where the inborn nature and responsibility of mass media in China lie broadcasting official policy as well as leading public opinion. Therefore, the data selected from mass media will be more representative and persuasive as modern standard Chinese at mainland. While, the present writer does not stop he
