论民事诉讼中的摸索证明

上传人:E**** 文档编号:118220383 上传时间:2019-12-11 格式:PDF 页数:49 大小:484.68KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
论民事诉讼中的摸索证明_第1页
第1页 / 共49页
论民事诉讼中的摸索证明_第2页
第2页 / 共49页
论民事诉讼中的摸索证明_第3页
第3页 / 共49页
论民事诉讼中的摸索证明_第4页
第4页 / 共49页
论民事诉讼中的摸索证明_第5页
第5页 / 共49页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《论民事诉讼中的摸索证明》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《论民事诉讼中的摸索证明(49页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、 密 级: 学校代码:10075 分类号: 学 号:20090242 法学硕士学位论文 论民事诉讼中的摸索证明 学 位 申 请 人 :严洁 指 导 教 师 :柯阳友 学 位 级 别 :法学硕士 学 科 专 业 :诉讼法学专业 授 予 单 位 :河北大学 答 辩 日 期:二一二年六月 Classified Index: CODE: 10075 U.D.C: NO: 20090242 A Dissertation for the Degree of M. Laws Discuss on the Fishing Expedition of Civil Procedure Candidate: Yan

2、 Jie Supervisor: Prof. Ke Yangyou Academic Degree Applied for: Master of Laws Specialty: Procedure Law University: Hebei University Date of Oral Examination: June,2012 摘 要 I 摘 要 证明活动直接或间接的决定了判决的结果以及当事人权利义务关系的最终确定。 随 着社会发展,当事人举证成为了诉讼证明活动中证据事实的主要来源。由于并非专业法 律人员,当事人的取证举证能力往往有所欠缺,在现代型民事诉讼案件中证据偏在的情 况更是常常发

3、生。此时当事人期望通过证据提出之后的证据调查程序,获得之前无法详 细知晓的信息的行为,即为摸索证明。 依据传统辩论主义,摸索证明是应当被禁止的,而由于辩论主义随着时代发展得到 修正,已经不足以作为禁止摸索证明的主要依据,其他法理原则在禁止摸索证明方面的 分析也并不周延,甚至可以作为摸索证明存在的依据。 我国民事诉讼制度中并未承认摸索证明, 但现有规定也在一定程度上对摸索证明的 构建具有包容性和缓和性。摸索证明制度的出发点是当事人进行了摸索证明的诉讼活 动,只针对一种行为,而适用情况并非具体的几种,对于实践中出现的新型民事诉讼案 件有很强的包容性,因此可以作为现行立法空缺的弥补手段而存在。 摸索

4、证明的证明标准与一般的证明标准不同,只有在高度盖然性的情况下,法院方 可认定当事人提出的线索具有可信性,进而敦促另一方提供相关证据。而对于摸索证明 的处理应当分情况进行, 在一定条件下承认摸索证明的合法性。 在没有具体的证据线索, 证明方法又不确定的“不适法的摸索证明”中,法院可以以证明事项不特定为由判定其 不合法。对于仅在形式上满足了证明方法特定化的要求,但并无具体线索的“不适法的 摸索证明” ,法院可以以该主张没有具体线索为由,不认可其证据调查的必要性。 “适法 的摸索证明”应当由法院承认其合法性,并对当事人的主张加以肯定,协助其从对方当 事人或第三人处取得相关证据,对其诉讼主张进行证明。

5、此外,在我国现行民事制度下 引入摸索证明, 应当注意对法官释明权及依职权进行证据调查权利的强化, 在证据交换、 证据保全方面也应当有所改进。 关键词 摸索证明 发现真实 辩论主义 举证责任 证明标准 Abstract II Abstract Prove activities directly or indirectly to the results of the ruling party and the rights and obligations are finalized. With the development of society, the rolls become the judi

6、cial proof activities the main source of evidence in the facts. Because there are not professional legal personnel, the burden of the evidence is in often ability, in the modern civil litigation cases in even more evidence of the partial often happen. At this time the evidence was put forward by exp

7、ectations of evidence investigation programs, and achieves the information known before cant detailed the behaviour that for grope for proof. Based on the traditional socialist grope for proof is the debate should be banned, and because the socialist along with the time development debate for a fix,

8、 has not banned grope as the main basis of proof, other legal principles in the analysis for banned proof is not perfect, even as the basis for to prove there. The country civil litigation system did not admit grope for proof, but the existing provisions do in a certain extent to proof for the const

9、ruction of inclusiveness and ease sexual. The starting point of the system is proved for the party for the proof of the lawsuit activity, only to a kind of behavior, and the applicable condition is not specific kinds, in the practice of the new appear in civil litigation has the very strong toleranc

10、e, and it can be as the present legislation vacancy to make up for the means, exist. For proof of the certificate standard and the general standards of proof is different, only at the height of the probability, the court may put forward that the parties have credibility clues, and then urged the oth

11、er party to provide relevant evidence. And for the processing of proof shall be groping situation points in some conditions, admitted the legitimacy of the proof for. In no concrete evidence of clues, proof and uncertain methodunsuited fishing expedition, the court may prove no particular matters by

12、 decide its lawful. Only in form to meet the specific requirements of the method of proof, but no specific clues of the unsuited fishing expedition, the court may this claim to have specific for clues, does not recognize the evidence the necessity of the investigation.Legal fishing expedition should

13、 be made by the Abstract III court admitted that its legitimacy, and to the parties asserted that, to help them from the other party or the third person to be obtained evidence related to its lawsuit advocates of proof. In addition, in the current civil system into grope for proof, attention shall b

14、e paid to the judge cohabitancy right and according to the power of the right to strengthen investigation evidence, the evidence, and the evidence preservation in exchange also should be improved. Key words fishing expedition truth discovering adversary system burden of proof standard of proof 目 录 IV 目 录 引 言1 第 1 章 摸索证明的基本问题概述2 1.1 摸索证明的概念界定 2 1.1.1 摸索证明的含义2 1.1.2 摸索证明的内涵3

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 学术论文 > 其它学术论文

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号