《法经济学视野下的行政复议救济制度研究》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《法经济学视野下的行政复议救济制度研究（33页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、湘潭大学 硕士学位论文 法经济学视野下的行政复议救济制度研究 姓名：伍拥军 申请学位级别：硕士 专业：法律经济法学 指导教师：陈乃新 20061001 I 摘 要 法经济学亦可称为经济分析法学，它是用经济学的概念与方法去研究法律问 题的一门由法学与经济学结合而成的新兴学科，也可以说是法学与经济学相互渗 透融合而成的一个新兴的理论体系和学术流派，具有法学属性。法经济学同任何 一种法学流派及其理论体系一样，从萌芽到兴起、发展直至走向成熟，也毫无例 外地经历过一个逐步的发展过程。 成本收益分析方法是法经济学中的一个重要命题，也是法律经济分析的一个 重要工具。法律成本是法律运作整个动态过程所付的代价。
2、法律收益，是指通过 法律对权利、义务、责任的确认分配、救济，促进实现社会资源的最佳配置，满 足法律主体的最大需要和利益，并促使社会公共生活更富效率的法律观念和法律 原则的总和。成本收益分析方法及理论是法学研究的理论领域和方法论上的重大 突破，已广泛被应用于政府行为、法律制度、诉讼程序的分析中，对包括我国在 内的世界各国的法制建设和法学研究无疑具有重大的意义。 我国虽然已经制定并实施了行政复议法 ，也在很大程度上完善了行政复议 救济制度。但是，在实践中也出现了行政复议制度不健全，功能难以充分发挥； 行政复议机构缺乏统一性和独立性；行政复议管辖中存在问题；行政复议范围相 对较为狭窄等问题，在权义和
3、责任等设置上有很多不合理之处，实施起来很不经 济。 针对我国目前的行政复议救济制度存在许多不经济的问题，笔者对该制度进 行了成本收益分析，从监控行政权力、保护相对人权益和解决行政争议三个方面 分析得出我国目前的行政复议救济制度很不经济，收益微弱。在对行政复议救济 制度的收益进行了一番分析后，本文就该制度的实施成本和社会成本进行了详细 分析和探讨。最后通过收益与成本的比较分析，笔者得出一个结论：行政复议救 济制度付出成本远远大于所得收益，应予废除。且于文中最后提出了两种立法构 想，即将行政复议救济制度纳入行政诉讼或信访救济的两种构想。 关键词: 法经济学 成本收益分析方法 行政复议救济制度 II
4、 ABSTRACT Economics of law can also be called law science of economic analysis, it is a new developing disciplines that studies the legal problem and is bound with law science and economics with concept and method of economics, it can be said that it is also a new developing theoretical system and s
5、chools of thought too because law science and economics permeate and merge each other, and has attribute of law science. Economics of law is the same as any kind of law science school and theoretical system, have gone through a progressive evolution without exception too from sprouting to rising, de
6、veloping until moving towards being hot. The method of the cost-benefit analysis is an important proposition in economics of law, and it is an important tool of legal economic analysis too. The cost of law is the cost that is paid in the whole dynamic course of legal operation. Law benefit means pro
7、moting and realizing the best disposition of social resources through assigning affirmation and relieving of the right, obligation, responsibility of the law, meet greatest need and interests of the legal subject, and impel the total of legal idea and legal principle of richer efficiency of social p
8、ublic life. The method is the great breakthrough on theory field and methodology in the study of law science, have already been applied to the analysis of governments behavior, legal system, contentious procedure extensively, it undoubtedly has a great meaning for legal construction and law science
9、study to the countries all over the world including our country. Though our country has already made and implemented the administrative reconsideration law , has improved the relieve system to a great extent in the administrative reconsideration. However, the system of administrative reconsideration
10、 is imperfect and the function is difficult to give full play in practice; The organization of administrative reconsideration lacks unity and independence; The problem exists in administering in the administrative reconsideration; The range of administrative reconsideration is comparatively narrow a
11、nd so on. There are many unreasonable places in setting right and responsibility, etc, and it is very uneconomical to implement. As to a lot of uneconomical problem in the relieve system of our countrys present administrative reconsideration, I have carried on cost-benefit analysis to this system, f
12、rom controlling administrative power, protecting the relative peoples rights and interests and solving administrative dispute three respects, and think that the relieve III system of our countrys present administrative reconsideration is very uneconomical, the benefit is faint. After analyzing the b
13、enefit of the relieve system of the administrative reconsideration, this text has carried on detailed analysis and discussion on the implementation cost and social cost of this system. Through the comparative analysis of benefit and cost finally, I draw a conclusion: the relieve systems cost is far
14、greater than profits and deserve to be abolished in administrative reconsideration. And put forward two kinds of legislative ideas in the article finally, namely, include the relieve system of the administrative reconsideration in administrative litigation or the relieve system by letters and visits
15、 from the masses two kinds of ideas. Key Words: Economics of law The method of the cost-benefit analysis system of our countrys present administrative reconsideration 湘潭大学湘潭大学 学位论文原创性声明学位论文原创性声明 本人郑重声明：所呈交的论文是本人在导师的指导下独立进行研究所取得 的研究成果。除了文中特别加以标注引用的内容外，本论文不包含任何其他个 人或集体已经发表或撰写的成果作品。对本文的研究做出重要贡献的个人和集 体，
16、均已在文中以明确方式标明。本人完全意识到本声明的法律后果由本人承 担。 作者签名： 日期： 年 月 日 学位论文版权使用授权书学位论文版权使用授权书 本学位论文作者完全了解学校有关保留、使用学位论文的规定，同意学校 保留并向国家有关部门或机构送交论文的复印件和电子版，允许论文被查阅和 借阅。本人授权湘潭大学可以将本学位论文的全部或部分内容编入有关数据库 进行检索，可以采用影印、缩印或扫描等复制手段保存和汇编本学位论文。 涉密论文按学校规定处理。 作者签名： 日期： 年 月 日 导师签名： 日期： 年 月 日 1 引 言 在我国， “行政复议”一词是伴随 20 世纪 80 年代行政法学和行政诉讼法学兴 起而出现的。我国行政法学将行政机关审查和裁决行政争议的法律制度统称为行 政复议。 “复”即重新或再次， “议”即审议并决定。前冠“行政” ，表明
