民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究

上传人:E**** 文档编号:116398425 上传时间:2019-11-16 格式:PDF 页数:59 大小:577.30KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究_第1页
第1页 / 共59页
民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究_第2页
第2页 / 共59页
民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究_第3页
第3页 / 共59页
民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究_第4页
第4页 / 共59页
民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究_第5页
第5页 / 共59页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究(59页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、 密级: 学校代码:10075 分类号: 学 号:20090217 法学硕士学位论文 民事诉讼胜诉酬金制度研究 学位申请人: 谢奎柱 指导教师: 陶建国 学位类别: 法学硕士 学科专业: 诉讼法学 授予单位: 河北大学 答辩日期: 二一二年六月 Classified Index: COAD: 10075 U.D.C NO: 20090217 A Dissertation for the Degree of M. Laws Research on the contingency fee system of civil proceedings Candidate: Xie Kuizhu Super

2、visor: Vice Prof. Tao Jianguo Academic Degree Applied for: Master of Laws Specialty: Procedure Law University: Hebei University Data of Oral Examination: June,2012 摘 要 I 摘 要 胜诉酬金制度作为一种区别于传统律师收费形式的新型律师代理方式, 是对传统律 师按小时收费、固定收费和按件收费等方式的有益补充,胜诉酬金制度下律师报酬的收 取与诉讼结果紧密相连,有效缓解了当事人诉讼压力、转移了当事人诉讼风险。 美国和英国不同的胜诉酬金收

3、取方式代表了胜诉酬金制度的两种不同模式。 美国的 胜诉酬金制度起步较早,发展程度较高,美国对该制度适用范围上的规定严谨而明了; 对胜诉酬金的收取比例,美国各州都有着严格的比例要求和不同的规制手段;美国的胜 诉酬金协议内容详尽而全面,具体涵盖了律师报酬的数额及支付条件、诉讼费用及其他 费用的处理、和解及撤诉情形的处理、律师的担保权、律师的解任和辞职等内容。英国 关于胜诉酬金制度立法的不断变革和对该制度的不断调整促使着胜诉酬金制度逐步走 向完善;另外,英国民事诉讼体制下的诉费转移规则、事后保险制度等都不断影响着胜 诉酬金制度的发展方向;针对胜诉酬金制度导致的诉讼费用不断上涨、诉讼中介人泛滥 和大量

4、附带诉讼的产生等问题,英国也采取了相应的应对措施。 综合分析胜诉酬金制度在美国和英国的发展历程,取得的现实成果、存在的问题及 其规制手段,结合我国律师收费现状,胜诉酬金制度在我国的适用具有一定的必要性。 分析胜诉酬金制度在我国的发展过程及适用现状,我国胜诉酬金制度表现出立法滞后、 适用范围过窄、酬金收取比例过于单一、律师风险性过大等问题。适当扩大我国胜诉酬 金制度的适用范围、丰富胜诉酬金的收取手段、加强律师信息披露及风险告知义务、注 重保障律师权益及建立解决律师费用纠纷的有效机制等对我国胜诉酬金制度的丰富、 完 善和保障胜诉酬金制度的健康有序发展能够起到一定的作用。 关键词 胜诉酬金制度 按条

5、件收费 风险代理收费 Abstract II Abstract Contingency fee system as a new way of lawyer agency which is different from the traditional lawyer fee is a useful supplement to the traditional lawyers charge by hour, fixed fees and charges by the piece. Under the contingency fee system, the remuneration of lawyer

6、is linked with the outcome of the proceedings closely. This system can ease the pressure of parties on litigation, as well as transfer the risk of them. The different ways of charging the contingency fee in the United States and the Britain represent the two different modes of the contingency fee sy

7、stem. The contingency fee system in the United States started more early, and the development degree of it is higher, the provisions on the scope of this system is strict and clear; states of the U.S. have strict ratio requirements and different regulatory instruments on the proportion of remunerati

8、on; the agreement of contingency fee in U.S. contains the amount of remuneration and terms of payment, payment of litigation costs and other expenses, reconciliation and withdrawal, security rights of lawyers, lawyers of the dismissal and resignation of content, etc. The reform and adjustment of the

9、 legislation of contingency fee system in UK is improving the development of contingency fee system gradually. In addition, under the British civil litigation ,the costs indemnity rule, litigation insurance system continue to affect the direction of development of the contingency fee system;to resol

10、ve the continuous rise of the litigation costs caused by contingency fee system,the proliferation of litigation intermediaries and a large number of incidental litigation, the United Kingdom has also taken the appropriate countermeasures. After a comprehensive analysis in favor of the development of

11、 the contingency fee system in, the achievements, problems and their countermeasures of regulation in both the United States and the United Kingdom, and combined with our charging status quo of the lawyers, contingency system applicable in our country with the necessity. After the analysis of the de

12、velopment and the application of the status quo of the contingency fee system, it has been found that contingency fee in china has the prominent problems of backward legislation, narrow applicable scope, single proportion of Abstract III remuneration ,and too much risk of the layers. To expand the s

13、cope of application of the contingency fee system in China appropriately, to rich the means of charging remuneration, to strengthen the law disclosure and risk notification obligation, to focus on the interests of guaranteeing lawyers and to establish a mechanism to resolve the dispute on attorneys

14、fees are useful to the contingency fee system in China, and they will improve and safeguard the healthy and orderly development of the contingency fee system. Keywords Contingency fee Contiditional fee Risk agent fee system 目 录 IV 目 录 引 言1 第 1 章 胜诉酬金制度概述2 1.1 胜诉酬金的定义和种类 2 1.1.1 胜诉酬金制度的定义2 1.1.2 胜诉酬金制度的种类3 1.2 胜诉酬金制度的特征 4 1.2.1 胜诉酬金制度所表现出的风险性4 1.2.2 胜诉酬金收取的附条件性

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 办公文档 > 其它办公文档

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号