留学paper写作-文化治理

上传人:鑫鑫****n 文档编号:108130676 上传时间:2019-10-22 格式:DOC 页数:7 大小:51.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
留学paper写作-文化治理_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
留学paper写作-文化治理_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
留学paper写作-文化治理_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
留学paper写作-文化治理_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
留学paper写作-文化治理_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《留学paper写作-文化治理》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《留学paper写作-文化治理(7页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、HotEssay论文网()-专业paper写作,report写作辅导中心留学paper写作-文化治理Most domestic scholars define cultural governance as the social function of culture, which leads to the generalization and even misuse of the concept of governance. The specific concept of cultural governance refers to the application of the cultural

2、 elements of social capital in the network governance, which embodies the relationship network of transverse interaction, and is not the rule and management of culture. Cultural governance is not only embodied in the governance of culture. It is also embodied in the governance based on culture. As f

3、ar as the former is concerned, the imbalance of national discourse, market discourse and civic discourse in Chinas cultural policy is a structural factor restricting cultural governance. In terms of the latter, it is not limited to seeking resources from the traditional, but cultural governance shou

4、ld be regarded as a response to the profound changes in the present culture, as social changes, value changes and cultural changes brought about by technological changes require social governance to pay more attention to cultural factors.国内学者多将文化治理定义为文化的社会功能,导致治理概念的泛化甚至误用。文化治理的具体概念是指社会资本的文化要素在网络治理中的

5、运用,它体现了关系网络的横向互动,而不是文化的规则和管理。文化治理不仅仅体现在对文化的治理上。它还体现在以文化为基础的治理上。就前者而言,中国文化政策中国家话语、市场话语和公民话语的不平衡是制约文化治理的结构性因素。就后者而言,它不仅限于寻求资源的传统,但是文化治理应当被视为应对深刻的变化在当下文化、社会变化、技术变革所带来的价值和文化变化需要社会治理更加关注文化因素。In recent years, in the context of governance research, especially the 18-session plenary put forward to promote n

6、ational governance system and the modernization of governance capacity, the discussion of cultural governance will be more. However, the current research is mainly on the concept and function of cultural governance interpretation, the relevant policy situation is not much attention. At the same time

7、, the interpretation of functional vision will generalize cultural governance into the social function of culture and bring about double ambiguity of problem consciousness and policy operation. This paper discusses the policy implication and policy situation of cultural governance from the perspecti

8、ve of the application of the cultural elements in the governance framework.近年来,在治理研究的语境中,特别是十八届三中全会提出推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化,对文化治理的探讨将会更多。然而,目前的研究主要集中在文化治理解释的概念和功能上,相关的政策情况关注不多。同时,功能愿景的解释将把文化治理概括为文化的社会功能,带来问题意识和政策运作的双重模糊。本文从文化元素在治理框架中的应用角度,探讨了文化治理的政策含义和政策态势。Cultural governance arose in the latter half of t

9、he 20th century, the United Nations, the European Union in the literature on the concept of cultural governance, its connotation is the political field of governance change into the cultural management, through the cooperation between the Government and non-governmental organizations to form a gover

10、nance pattern of cultural management. In domestic research, based on the compound form of culture + governance, peoples understanding of cultural governance has two perspectives, one is the governance of culture and the other is based on cultural governance. The governance of culture is to introduce

11、 governance into culture, emphasizing that cultural public administration should change from traditional control mode to modern governance mode, which is similar to the concept of the European Unions cultural governance. The Ministry of Cultures ability to promote cultural governance is focused on t

12、his. Culture-based governance is the introduction of culture to governance, emphasizing the integration of cultural functions into the social management vision, such as Hu Huilin that cultural governance is the use of cultural functions to overcome and solve the problems of national development of t

13、he tool.文化治理兴起于20世纪下半叶,联合国,欧盟在文学文化治理的概念,其内涵是政治治理转变为文化管理领域,通过政府和非政府组织之间的合作治理模式的文化管理。在国内的研究中,基于“文化+治理”的复合形式,人们对文化治理的理解有两个角度,一个是对文化的治理,另一个是基于文化治理。文化治理是将治理引入文化,强调文化公共行政应由传统的控制模式向现代的治理模式转变,这与欧盟的文化治理理念相似。文化部推动文化治理的能力就集中在这方面。以文化为基础的治理是将文化引入治理,强调文化功能融入社会管理视野,如胡惠林认为文化治理是“利用文化功能克服和解决国家发展问题的工具”。The second pers

14、pective is to define cultural governance from the perspective of cultural positive function, which has wide influence. But the analysis found that in the functional field of vision, cultural governance is about the culture of the culture, the rule of the country, all the cultural is governance, cult

15、ural governance has become a cultural repetition. In other words, the concept of cultural governance is merely a new analysis of the social and maintenance functions of culture. In this way, cultural governance is not a new topic, but the phenomenon of ancient times. As Hu Huilin said, people create

16、 and produce culture is for the governance of people, Knot and Cure, later Saints easy to book. This is the earliest description of the relationship between culture and social governance in ancient China. It is based on this perspective that in some scholars, cultural governance is in the political, economic and social aspects of cultural construction, such as the Government to strengthen the core value system to build and develop the cultural indu

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 外语文库 > 英语写作

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号