《刑事诉讼论文：试论刑事诉讼证明责任的分配》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《刑事诉讼论文：试论刑事诉讼证明责任的分配（5页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、 刑事诉讼论文：试论刑事诉讼证明责任的分配【中文摘要】在当前中国,在刑事诉讼证明主体不确定、证明对象内容多但范围窄、证明标准单一化的现状,忽视了证明主体之间举证能力的大小的不同,忽视了证明对象本身的差异,忽视了证明标准的层次性和多元性,不能形成划分证明责任所必须的科学体系,也使我国刑事诉讼证明责任的分配和承担处于一种较为混乱现状。学界对于这种现状进行了分析和论证,并提出了对证明责任体系构建的观点。有些观点立足于现状,结合现有刑事诉讼制度,提出一些改良的方案;而另外一些观点则趋向于对刑事诉讼证明责任制度进而对整个刑事诉讼制度进行体制上的大手术。笔者来自司法实务界,为完成论文,参阅了大量的书籍和文
2、献资料,引用了其中较为成熟的观点论证自己的设想,并提出了一些自己的观点和意见。囿于理论研究水平和司法工作人员身份,笔者提出的一些观点可能比较幼稚,甚至带有一些先入为主的观念。但是,“实践是检验真理的唯一标准”,笔者的部分观点,在一定程度上反映了司法工作者对证明责任制度的困扰和对当前刑事诉讼证明责任制度的反思。笔者希望通过本文,能对司法实践中混乱的证明责任分配找出一些可以走的路子和方法。本文拟从司法实践中遇到的三个贪污、贿赂案例出发,重新界定刑事诉讼证明主体、证明对象,重新设定刑事诉讼证明标准,分析我国证明责任的概念,探析构建我国证明责任体系的必要原则,并为构建我国刑事诉讼控辩双方证明责任提出一
3、点自己的想法。同时,笔者认为,构建我国刑事诉讼证明责任制度必须要坚持无罪推定的原则、坚持平衡控辩双方诉讼力量的原则、坚持证明便利原则、坚持常损害原则、坚持合理地有利于被告人的原则,在此基础上合理的划分控辩双方的证明责任。【英文摘要】In current China, in criminal judicial proof subject not sure, the object of proof, more content but narrow range, standards of proof of the present situation of simplification, ignori
4、ng the burden of proof ability between the size of the different, and ignore the object of proof itself differences, and ignore the standards of proof of hierarchy and diversity, cant form division to proof responsibility system of science, also make our criminal judicial proof the allocation of res
5、ponsibility and take in a more chaotic situation. Academic circles for this kind of analysis of the current situation and argument, and proposed to the proof responsibility system construction point of view. Some view based on present situation, in line with the existing criminal litigation system,
6、and puts forward some improvement plan; And some other ideas tend to the proof system in criminal action and the whole criminal judicial system system on the operation.The author from judicial practice, to complete paper, refer to a large number of books and literature material, cited among the more
7、 mature view demonstrates his own ideas, and puts forward some ideas and opinions. Instead of the theory research level and judicial personnel identity, the author puts forward some points of view may be naive, even with some of the first concept. But, “practice is the sole criterion for testing tru
8、th”, the author of the point, in a certain extent, reflected the judicial workers to the proof system trouble and on the current criminal judicial proof responsibility system of thought. The author hope through this paper, to the judicial practice of chaos proof responsibility distribution can go fi
9、nd some way and method.This paper from the judicial practice of meet three corruption, bribery case of criminal procedure to define that subject, object of proof, reset criminal judicial proof standard, analyzes the concept of burden of proof, the paper our country to build the necessary proof respo
10、nsibility system principle, and for the construction of our countrys criminal procedure of the accused and the defended proof responsibility both sides put forward a little of his own idea. At the same time, the author thinks that, our country to build criminal judicial proof responsibility system m
11、ust adhere to the principle of presumption of innocence, and adhere to the balance of the accused and the defended the principle of the lawsuit power, and adhere to the principle of convenience, and adhere to the proof, and adhere to the principle of often damage to the principle of reasonable to th
12、e defendant, and based on this, the reasonable division of the accused and the defended the burden of proof.【关键词】刑事诉讼 证明责任 分配【英文关键词】criminal suit burden of proof distribution【备注】在线加我索购全文 ：1-3-9-9.38-8-4-8同时提供论文发表委托服务和一对一论文写作指导。【目录】试论刑事诉讼证明责任的分配内容摘要6-7Abstract7-8一、从案例看我国证明责任制度的现状11-12二、证明责任体系的基础架构12-
13、22（一） 证明主体12-141. 两大法系关于证明主体的界定132. 我国关于证明主体的界定13-14（二） 证明对象14-171. 证明对象的主要学说14-152. 我国刑事诉讼证明对象的内容和范围15-17（三） 证明标准17-221. 证明标准的特征及功能17-182. 证明标准的不同表述18-193. 我国刑事诉讼证明标准的设定19-204. 对我国刑事诉讼证明标准体系构建的一点设想20-22三、证明责任的概念、原则及分配22-32（一） 证明责任的概念22-251. 证明责任的域外概念22-244. 我国证明责任概念的设置24-25（二） 证明责任架构的基本原则25-281. 无罪
14、推定原则25-262. 平衡控辩双方诉讼力量原则263. 证明便利原则26-274. 常态损害原则275. 合理的有利于被告人原则27-28（三） 对我国刑事诉讼证明责任分配的一点设想28-301. 控方证明责任28-292. 辩方证明责任29-30（四）对案例的再分析30-32致谢32-33参考文献33-34企业一般可在支付平台上备案多个用于税费电子支付的账号，法人卡用户可通过点击“修改可操作账号”，将这些银行账号的操作权限给予指定的操作员卡用户，并设定最大可操作金额。several group number, then with b a, =c,c is is methyl b two v
15、ertical box between of accurate size. Per-23 measurement, such as proceeds of c values are equal and equal to the design value, then the vertical installation accurate. For example a, b, and c valueswhile on horizontal vertical errors for measurement, General in iron angle code bit at measurement level points grid errors, specific method is from baseline to methyl vertical box center line distance for a, to b vertical box distance for b, list can measured
